NR 505 Week 7: Evidence-based Practice Project Proposal
Chamberlain University NR 505 Week 7: Evidence-based Practice Project Proposal– Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Chamberlain University NR 505 Week 7: Evidence-based Practice Project Proposal assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NR 505 Week 7: Evidence-based Practice Project Proposal
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Chamberlain University NR 505 Week 7: Evidence-based Practice Project Proposal depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NR 505 Week 7: Evidence-based Practice Project Proposal
The introduction for the Chamberlain University NR 505 Week 7: Evidence-based Practice Project Proposal is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for NR 505 Week 7: Evidence-based Practice Project Proposal
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NR 505 Week 7: Evidence-based Practice Project Proposal assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NR 505 Week 7: Evidence-based Practice Project Proposal
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NR 505 Week 7: Evidence-based Practice Project Proposal
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NR 505 Week 7: Evidence-based Practice Project Proposal assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for NR 505 Week 7: Evidence-based Practice Project Proposal
Nursing Practice Concern/Problem
Patient education at the time of discharge is vital in enabling them to take part in their health and be able to manage their health issues outside of the hospital. Due to the immense benefits of patient education during discharge, patient satisfaction with discharge education currently characterizes an excellent part of hospital reimbursement nationwide, as measured by the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey (HCAHPS) scores. In this context, the teach-back method has been proposed as the best way to ensure that the older adult patient retain the discharge instructions taught to them and gain confidence in the management of their health at the time of discharge (Da Hinh et al., 2016). However, this noble practice is reportedly done poorly in many health care settings. Therefore, the nursing practice concern is the provision of ineffective and inadequate patient education during discharge. Essentially, providing ineffective and inadequate patient education at discharge is associated with many adverse impacts to patients such as increasing the chances of readmission, poor disease management, and patient/caregiver medication errors. Eventually, there is likelihood of poor patient satisfaction and outcomes and also reduction in HCAPS results and hospital reimbursement for care rendered (Allen, Hutchinson, Brown & Livingston, 2014).
PICOT Question
For the older adults (over 65), being discharged from the Geriatric Enhanced Medicine (GEM) unit at Columbia University Medical Center (CUMC), can the use of the teach-back method with discharge education, compared to not using the teach-back method with discharge education, improve patient satisfaction within eight weeks, as measured by the HCAHPS survey questions?
Key Stakeholders
The key stakeholders involved include the patients, physicians, patients, nurse practitioners, insurance companies, management of the health facility, and pharmacists. These stakeholders provide valuable resources and necessary support in planning and initiating the proposed teach-back method of providing patient education during patient discharge.
Theoretical Framework
This EBP project will be guided by the Dorothea Orem theory of nursing. The theory is divided into three parts namely theory of self care, theory of self care deficit, and theory of nursing system. According to Orem, self-care connotes practices initiated and performed by a person for personal benefits such as maintaining life, health, and wellness. On the other hand, the theory of self-care deficit specifies when nursing is required. In particular, it states that nursing is needed when an adult is incapable of providing continuous good self care. Therefore, Orem advances five nursing helping techniques including guiding others, teaching another, acting for and doing for others, providing a good environment to foster personal development to realize future demands, and supporting another. Finally, the theory of nursing systems illustrates the manner in which the self care needs of the patients will be met by the nurse, the patient, or both of them. Overall, the major assumptions of this theory are;
ALSO READ:
NR 505 Week 7 Assignment: Evidence-based Practice Project Proposal Outline SOLUTION
NR505 Week 7 Assignment Evidence-based Practice Project Proposal Outline SOLUTION
NR 505 Week 8: Future Use of Evidence-Based Practice
NR 505 Why are research and evidence-based practice important for professional nursing?
NR 505 Using Evidence to Address Practice Issues SOLUTION
NR 505 Reflect upon the nursing practice issue of interest that you identified in earlier discussion assignments
NR 505 Collaboration Café – Qualitative Research (graded)
NR 505 What factors might influence the particular data collection method that is used within a research study?
NR 505 Reflect upon the impact of evidence-based practice on health outcomes, the nursing profession, and healthcare delivery
- Individuals should be self-dependent and responsible for own care and the family members who need care.
- Individuals are distinct
- Attaining self-care needs is crucial element of primary care and prevention of poor health.
- An individual’s awareness of possible health challenges is vital in enhancing self-care behaviors.
- Self-care and autonomous care behaviors are learned within the context of socio-cultural.
Essentially, the Orem’s theory is applicable in nursing practice as it assists nurses to enhance the health of patients by making them autonomous. In the present EBP project, providing ways to improve effective discharge teaching to enable patients leave the hospital with more confidence and better understanding of how to manage their health conforms to the provision of theory’s perspective that a patient has skills to create actions that meet personal needs of the patient becomes suitable for self care.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NR 505 Week 7: Evidence-based Practice Project Proposal
Literature Review
Over the past decade, the conversion from hospital to home care has been associated with increased risks, especially for older adults with intricate care needs. This risk is associated with many factors including patient’s lack of or poor understanding of discharge instructions. According to Waniga et al. (2016), the time of discharge from the hospital is extremely vulnerable for patients with nearly 19% of patients experiencing adverse events of post discharge such as uncertainty, anxiety, and lack of understanding about discharge instructions. All these lead to readmission rates, and influence the overall perception of the hospital experience. Therefore, non-sophisticated discharge instructions are vital to ensure seamless change from hospital to home, when the care responsibility changes from the providers to patients and care givers (Navanandan et al., 2017). Consequently, nurses play a crucial role in providing discharge instructions to patients.
Moreover, older adults face challenges such as functional capacity, inability for self care, and deteriorated health status. Therefore, before hospital discharge, it is imperative for nurses to provide discharge education that considers the perspectives of the adults to prevent challenges associated with self-care (Ghiasvand et al., 2017). One of the best discharge instructional methods is teach-back method. This method refers to a communication technique used by the nurses to verify whether or not a patient understands what they are told. If the patient understands, he or she is able to accurately teach-back the information. This method is crucial in enhancing the patient understanding of post-discharge care requirements (Griffey et al., 2015). Moreover, it is imperative for nurses to utilize written and visual materials to further increase patient understanding and appeal for various learning methods such as visual and auditory.
Data Collection Methods
The data will be collected using the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) surveys. HCAHPS connotes a patient satisfaction survey recommended for all health care settings in America. It seeks to produce comparable data on the views of the patient on health care to facilitate objective and focused comparisons between facilities (Piper & Tallman, 2016). The other method entails the use of questionnaires, which consist of a set of questions that are intended to obtain information from respondents. Other methods that can be used include interviews, focused groups, and observations.
Analysis
After completing data collection, the data analysis will begin by manipulating the data in various ways including plotting the data out and seeking correlation or developing a pivot table in Excel. The pivot table is important in fostering sorting the data based on various variables (Grech, 2018). However, if the outcome of the manipulation of the data does not result in the required data, it is necessary to collect more data or revise the original survey questions. Nonetheless, the original analysis of the correlations, trends, and variations is crucial in focusing the data analysis to effectively answer the question and address any objection that may arise.
Expected Outcomes
It has been established that patients who are discharged without proper understanding of discharge instructions tend to develop significant complications. Such complications could lead to adverse patient outcomes such as hospital readmission, medication errors, post-operative infections, and influence of overall perception of hospital experience. Therefore, it is expected that effective methods of providing discharge education such as teach-back method would address such challenges and equip the patients with increased knowledge on self care management.
References
Allen, J., Hutchinson, A., Brown, R., & Livingston, P. (2014). Quality care outcomes followingtransitional care interventions for older people from hospital to home: A systematic review. BMC Health Services Research, 14, 346. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-346.
Ghiasvand, F., Riazi, H., Hajian, S., Kazemi, E., & Firoozi, A. (2017). The effect of a self-care program based on the teach-back method on the postpartum quality of life. Electronic physician, 9(4), 4180–4189. https://doi.org/10.19082/4180
Grech, V. (2018). WASP (Write a Scientific Paper) using Excel–2: Pivot tables. Early human development, 117, 104-109.
Griffey, R. T., Shin, N., Jones, S., Aginam, N., Gross, M., Kinsella, Y., Williams, J. A., Carpenter, C. R., Goodman, M., & Kaphingst, K. A. (2015). The impact of teach-back on comprehension of discharge instructions and satisfaction among emergency patients with limited health literacy: A randomized, controlled study. Journal of communication in healthcare, 8(1), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1179/1753807615Y.0000000001
Ha Dinh, T. T., Bonner, A., Clark, R., Ramsbotham, J., & Hines, S. (2016). The effectiveness of the teach-back method on adherence and self-management in health education for people with chronic disease: a systematic review. JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports, 14(1), 210–247. https://doi.org/10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2296
Navanandan, N., Schmidt, S. K., Cabrera, N., DiStefano, M. C., & Mistry, R. D. (2017). The caregiver perspective on unscheduled 72-hour return visits to pediatric acute care sites: a focus on discharge processes. Academic pediatrics, 17(7), 755-761.
Piper, L. E., & Tallman, E. (2016). Hospital consumer assessment of healthcare providers and systems: An ethical leadership dilemma to satisfy patients. The health care manager, 35(2), 151-155.
Waniga, H. M., Gerke, T., Shoemaker, A., Bourgoine, D., & Eamranond, P. (2016). The impact of revised discharge instructions on patient satisfaction. Journal of patient experience, 3(3), 64-68.
Sample Answer 2 for NR 505 Week 7: Evidence-based Practice Project Proposal
It is imperative that healthcare providers, communities, state and local public health departments, and other government entities promote high-quality end-of-life care so that the negative consequences of living with and dying from chronic terminal illness can be prevented. The WHO strategy for palliative care recommends educational initiatives directed toward both the public and healthcare professionals. “Examples, such as the Dying Matters Coalition in England and Good life, Good death, Good grief in Scotland, have been established with the aim of engaging society in becoming more open about death, dying and bereavement.” (Brogaard et Al, 2016)
Fit- Knowing whether or not a Nurse practitioner could enhance the election of hospice or palliative care in community residing aging individuals would definitely fit into the target group.
feasibility- It is entirely feasible to incorporate an Np at different levels of healthcare to communicate the importance of quality end-of-life care within the community setting.
Appropriateness- It is certainly appropriate to implement an end-of-life specialist in the form of an advanced degree nurse to educate the aging community on hospice and palliative care
Plan- Identify the need to improve understanding regarding end-of-life care in the community dwelling aging population. Illustrate an interview process designed to better understand participants’ position on electing hospice care when curative treatments are no longer beneficial, and further disclosing their outlook on the impact having an informative conversation with a nurse practitioner. Do– Using a comprehensive interview process, the project leader is able to gather information on participants’ past, ideas, understanding on the subject, as well as their experiences with hospice and palliative care. The researcher will develop a blue print for the interview made up of open-ended questions about hospice underuse and misuse, but at the same time, will allow the conversation to unfold in the way that the subject leads. Follow-up questions should be tailored to individual discussions, and should be based around the respondent’s initial answers. Trust must be established early on between the project coordinator or researcher and participant or subject so that true feelings, thoughts, and actions are shared. Because of the dynamic interaction, the project coordinator or researcher is unable to take notes, so recording of the interview is done with the participant or subject’s permission. The interview is then transcribed from the audio into text format so that the project coordinator or researcher can reflect upon common themes present within the interview and compare responses of different participants or subjects. Study– review the recordings performed during the interview process and document all pertinent information making special note of trends and similarities in responses. Act– follow up with participants to gather any additional information that may be beneficial to improving the underuse and misuse of hospice and palliative care. One way to overcome the roadblock of utilizing the knowledge gathered in this evidence based project would be to incorporate critical listening skills. A critical listener looks beyond the words for the message by picking up on body language, and emotion from the speaker in order to gather a more accurate perception of the message.
Resources needed for my action plan will include: a computer, paper, printer, an environment to analyze the data collected, research assistance to help with data transfer from voice recording to computer program.
Success of this particular study would materialize as literature included in educational developments for the advancement of community based hospice and palliative care.
One future research study that would be useful in extending knowledge on the misuse and underuse of hospice and palliative care would be a study to identify bereaved families’ views on and experiences with end of life care, specifically, how the families viewed availability of staff, symptom control, spiritual support, and overall quality of care.
Brogaard, T., Neergaard, M. A., & Murray, S. A. (2016). Promoting palliative care in the community: a toolkit to improve and develop primary palliative care throughout Europe. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 34(1), 3–4. http://doi.org/10.3109/02813432.2016.1152092
Sample Answer 3 for NR 505 Week 7: Evidence-based Practice Project Proposal
Evaluation is the last step in the introduction of evidence-based practice projects in clinical settings. Evaluation seeks to inform the stakeholders of the project about its achievements, strengths, weaknesses and opportunities that should be explored in the future to achieve optimum outcomes. Evaluation outcomes also provide information on knowledge gaps that can be addressed in future evidence-based practice projects. Therefore, the purpose of this section of the project is to examine the evaluation methods that will be utilized in the change initiative.
Expected Outcomes
The anticipated outcomes of the project are varied. One of them is the reduction in the incident rate of catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) in the hospital. The reduction will be attributed to the fact that 0.9% chlorhexidine has been shown in studies to be highly effective in reducing the risk of infections when compared to 0.1% normal saline (Noto et al., 2015). The other outcome is the reduction in the cost incurred by patients. The reduction in the incidence rate of CAUTIs will imply that the costs that patients incur will be lowered due to the minimal need for additional care (Swan et al., 2016). It is also anticipated that the project will result in the reduction in the hospital stay by patients. CAUTIs increase the number of days of hospital stay by patients due to the need for further care and management. Lastly, it is expected that the intervention will be utilized consistently to improve the outcomes of care for hospitalized patients in the institution.
Data Collection Tool
Questionnaires will be used for collecting the data needed for this project. Questionnaires will be appropriate because they will be easy to administer to the healthcare providers. Questionnaires will also enable the acquisition of large amounts of data within a short period. The data obtained will also be easily organized for data analysis (Kim et al., 2020). The student will work in collaboration with the instructors and other colleagues to determine the validity of the developed questionnaires. Reliability of the questionnaires will be determined through test-retest methods. The questionnaires will be administered to sampled healthcare providers and be re-administered again after some time to determine its ability to provide consistent data. Applicability will be maintained by ensuring that appropriate questions that relate to the project are asked to the stakeholders (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019).
Statistical Test
The statistical test that will be calculated in the project is mean. Mean will be the most appropriate because it will provide an accurate measure of the effectiveness of the intervention. Mean is also associated with minimal error of prediction. Its use will produce the lowest possible error from the entire data sets that will be obtained from the project (Kim et al., 2020). The accuracy of the impact of the project will therefore be obtained by computing data on the mean value of the entire data sets.
Methods Applied to Data Collection Tool
The test-retest data will be used to revise the data collection tool. The data obtained will be curated to ensure its applicability and accuracy in the project. Data curation will be done to ensure that the questionnaire obtains the most appropriate data for the project. The effectiveness of the project will be measured based on its outcomes. The focus will be placed on determining whether the anticipated outcomes of the project were achieved or not. Measures such as the reduction in the incidence rate of the CAUTIs will be used to imply the effectiveness of the project (Whitehead et al., 2020).
Strategies is Outcomes do not Provide Expected Results
The first strategy that will be adopted if the project does not provide the expected results is revising the strategies that were utilized. Revision of strategies will be done to ensure that they align with the anticipated outcomes of the project. The second strategy will be extending the project timelines. Extension will enable the incorporation of new strategies to achieve the desired optimum outcomes. Lastly, additional resources will be sought. An example will be seeking expert assistance to ensure the faults are corrected and optimum outcomes achieved for the program.
Extending, Maintaining, Revising and Discontinuing the Proposed Solution
The project will be maintained if it is found to have positive effects on clinical outcomes. It will also be maintained if it is found that is it efficient in facilitating the improvement of outcomes of care for the patients. The project will be revised if it is found that the strategies did not align with the anticipated outcomes. It will also be revised if aspects of implementation did not occur as planned. The project will be discontinued if found to have negative effect on the health of the patients. The discontinuation will be done with the aim of ensuring safety in care that patients receive.
Conclusion
In summary, evaluation is an important process in the implementation of evidence-based practice program. Evaluation provides project stakeholders with insights into the effectiveness of the project in achieving its desired outcomes. The project will be measured based on outcome measures. Questionnaires will be used to obtain the needed data. The outcomes of the project will determine the decisions that are made on its utilization in the organization.
References
Kim, M., Mallory, C., & Valerio, T. (2020). Statistics for Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2019). Evidence-based Practice in Nursing & Healthcare: A Guide to Best Practice. Wolters Kluwer.
Noto, M. J., Domenico, H. J., Byrne, D. W., Talbot, T., Rice, T. W., Bernard, G. R., & Wheeler, A. P. (2015). Chlorhexidine Bathing and Health Care–Associated Infections: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA, 313(4), 369–378. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.18400
Swan, J. T., Ashton, C. M., Bui, L. N., Pham, V. P., Shirkey, B. A., Blackshear, J. E., Bersamin, J. B., Pomer, R. M. L., Johnson, M. L., Magtoto, A. D., Butler, M. O., Tran, S. K., Sanchez, L. R., Patel, J. G., Ochoa, R. A., Hai, S. A., Denison, K. I., Graviss, E. A., & Wray, N. P. (2016). Effect of Chlorhexidine Bathing Every Other Day on Prevention of Hospital-Acquired Infections in the Surgical ICU: A Single-Center, Randomized Controlled Trial*. Critical Care Medicine, 44(10), 1822–1832. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000001820
Whitehead, D., Ferguson, C., Faan, G. L.-W., PhD RN, & Faan, J. H., PhD RN. (2020). Nursing and Midwifery Research: Methods and Appraisal for Evidence Based Practice. Elsevier Health Sciences.