NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 5 Discussion Drivers of High Performance Healthcare Systems
Chamberlain University NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 5 Discussion Drivers of High Performance Healthcare Systems– Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Chamberlain University NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 5 Discussion Drivers of High Performance Healthcare Systems assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 5 Discussion Drivers of High Performance Healthcare Systems
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Chamberlain University NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 5 Discussion Drivers of High Performance Healthcare Systems depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 5 Discussion Drivers of High Performance Healthcare Systems
The introduction for the Chamberlain University NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 5 Discussion Drivers of High Performance Healthcare Systems is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 5 Discussion Drivers of High Performance Healthcare Systems
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 5 Discussion Drivers of High Performance Healthcare Systems assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 5 Discussion Drivers of High Performance Healthcare Systems
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 5 Discussion Drivers of High Performance Healthcare Systems
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 5 Discussion Drivers of High Performance Healthcare Systems assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 5 Discussion Drivers of High Performance Healthcare Systems
Select two drivers (for example quality, cost, and access) of high performance healthcare systems and apply it to your current work situation. The application could demonstrate the presence of the driver in a positive manner or it could acknowledge the presence of a concern.
One driver for high performance healthcare systems is actual access to healthcare. On average, the residents of the southern part of the United States have less access to healthcare (Nguyen & Sommers, 2016). One study in my home state of Arkansas revealed over forty four percent of the population does not have medical insurance (Nguyen & Sommers, 2016). These residents will be less likely to visit a medical professional be less likely to visit a medical professional when they have an issue, or they might not be compliant with the prescribed treatment due to lack of finances. I have seen this issue appear time and time again in my professional practice. We have patients admitted with an infected limb because they did not see a physician when they first noticed symptoms. Because they waited too long, the condition worsened, and severe infection developed.
They might endure multiple surgeries and still end with a limb amputation. A clear majority of these patients are also diabetic and do not monitor their blood sugar or take the prescribed medication; these practices also contribute to their complications. These patients remain in the hospital for weeks and are drowning in medical bills they cannot afford when they are discharged. If affordable healthcare were accessible to these patients, they might be better able to maintain their illnesses at home and prevent the complications that ultimately cost them even more money. The healthcare system is ultimately a business geared to show profit. As healthcare professionals, we must be mindful of our patient’s financial situation when we prescribe treatments. We have to be flexible in our options for patients to help them be the most successful when maintaining their health.
ALSO READ:
NR 506 Week 6 Discussion Using the Media
NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 6 Discussion Using the Media
NR 506 Week 7: RN as Healthcare Policy Leader Discussion 2018
NR 506 Week 7 Discussion RN as Healthcare Policy Leader
NR 506- Healthcare Policy Week 7 Discussion RN as Healthcare Policy Leader
NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 7 Discussion RN as Healthcare Policy Leader
NR 506 Week 8 Discussion Reflection: Global Policy Reform
NR 506- Healthcare Policy Week 8 Discussion Reflection Global Policy Reform
NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 8 Discussion Reflection Global Policy Reform
Another driver of the healthcare system is quality. I have heard this term addressed many times by both our supervisor and administration. Quality and patient safety are two concepts that are intertwined (Akram et al., 2017). The reason for quality is to promote patient’s well being while in our care in the hospital (Akram et al., 2017). Quality scores have become an even more prominent concept since patients now have increased access to this information and can choose where to seek medical attention based on these scores (Akram et al., 2017). On my own unit, we have a trauma quality team assessing us. The results that they find will be made known to the individual at home, to insurance companies, and to government agencies that control medical funding. The results of these scores are also reflected in the hospital’s repayment for services. If the reimbursement amount decreases because of our inferior performance, our jobs could be in jeopardy. Therefore, understanding this driver is of utmost importance for nurses. The manner in which we provide care and the quality of care we provide affect more than our one patient. Our performance may determine what equipment and services we have access to and could ultimately impinge on our jobs as well.
References
Akram, G., Tayyebeh, R., Farahnaz, A., Zahra, S., & Iman, D. (2017). Quality of healthcare services and its relationship with patient safety culture and nurse-physician professional communication. Health Promotion Perspectives, Vol 7, Iss 3, Pp 168-174 (2017), (3), 168. doi:10.15171/hpp.2017.30
Nguyen, K. H., & Sommers, B. D. (2016). Access and Quality of Care by Insurance Type for Low-Income Adults Before the Affordable Care Act. American Journal Of Public Health, 106(8), 1409. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2016.303156
Sample Answer 2 for NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 5 Discussion Drivers of High Performance Healthcare Systems
Quality drivers of high performance in healthcare systems matter for medical surgeon units and family nurse practitioners because they strive to motivate the clinicians to improve their services due to the ever-evolving nature of health care industry. In many instances, quality touches on critical areas such as facility management, patient care, and financial processes. Therefore, understanding critical factors that drive quality improvement is essential to nurse practitioners in the medical surgeon unit and family nurses when it comes to making informed decisions, utilizing the most beneficial systems, and successfully delivering high patient-centered care that patients deserve (Akachi & Kruk, 2017). However, due to rapid growth in population, there is a high demand for health care services, leading to challenges in finding ways to sustain the technological demands especially in the medical surgeon units, physical, and fiscal demands of patient care. Therefore, nurses working in medical surgeon units and family nurses should strive to improve their personal and professional characteristics to enhance quality. Besides, their focus should be based on proven quality enhancers such as utilization of electronic medical records to improve practice, research, policy, and sensible realities of creating quality infrastructure.
Concerning cost drivers, studies agree that technological changes are mostly attributed to the increasing spending on health care. Besides, Value-based payment (VBP) models are also associated with increase in health costs (Saleh & Shaffer, 2016). In medical surgeon units, new technology in diagnosis and treatment is significantly used to replace to replace the older technologies. Consequently, advancing technology in this unit tend to create remarkable impact on health care spending due to the conditions that the proficiency of such technology must be demonstrated before they are formally utilized in patient care (Okpala, 2018). Besides, family nurse practice is associated with high nurse and drug costs, high administrative expenses, costly end-of-life care, and unhealthy behaviors. In a nutshell, cost drivers present challenges in provision of quality health care in medical surgeon units and family nursing practice especially where financial resources are not sufficient to cater for rising technological needs and other factors critical for nursing practice.
References
Akachi, Y., & Kruk, M. E. (2017). Quality of care: measuring a neglected driver of improved health. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 95(6), 465.
Okpala, P. (2018). Assessment of the influence of technology on the cost of healthcare service and patient’s satisfaction. International Journal Of Healthcare Management, 11(4), 351-355.
Saleh, K. J., & Shaffer, W. O. (2016). Understanding value-based reimbursement models and trends in orthopaedic health policy: an introduction to the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA) of 2015. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 24(11), e136-e147.
Sample Answer 3 for NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 5 Discussion Drivers of High Performance Healthcare Systems
Reading your response I agree with you, utilizing the Just culture algorhythm is an appropriate approach to deal with something like this. I have used this tool before and it really helps to decide which route is best take when dealing with the situation. It can help separate repeat offenders or continued at risk behaviors from innocent wrong doing most likely due to the systems and processes in place needing to be evaluated.
I can say with certainty that the travelers who work in my organization do not get very much orientation to the unit they’re working in. When someone is coming to help cover staffing for only 6-13 weeks not very much time can be utilized for orientation. It does make me consider the fact that maybe the 2 to maybe 3 shifts that an traveler gets may not be sufficient, very hard to know what is best. Although, this could definitely happen to anyone, traveler or not, especially in times of being rushed and understaffed. I have seen unfortunate outcomes happen to the best and most experienced nurses I have worked with. It’s very humbling and reminds me of how important it is to be vigilant to provide high quality of care to my patients.
Sample Answer 4 for NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 5 Discussion Drivers of High Performance Healthcare Systems
That sounds wonderful that your hospital has opened up its own pharmacy. At a hospital I used to work at, we were able to get several over-the-counter medications there, but that was limited to employees only. Where I currently work, we have no such program. This would be wonderful for satisfaction of the patients and families. If a patient was being discharged and was able to get their meds from the pharmacy without having to go to another building this could definitely increase their patient satisfaction scores. For another example: As a nurse who worked a 12 hour shift, it would be great to just stop by the pharmacy and pick up mine or my children’s medications and go home from there instead of having to make an additional stop. The fact that these medications are available for a cheaper price is even more appealing. It is interesting to me that you mention you wonder how other places can charge such large amounts. I have always been confused other different pharmacies offer different pricing. Why can’t these prices be standardized? I do understand that the costs can be different depending on the insurance that the person has, but to have different costs at different pharmacies with the same insurance simply does not make sense to me.
Access is something I think of a lot on a personal level as well as on a professional level. I too live in a rural area with limited hospitals around. We are an hour and a half from any major hospital. We have several doctor’s offices. Luckily, I believe our CEO understood the importance of broadening access to our patients, because a few years ago we opened up a Convenient Care Center where people can go 7 days a week for acute and non-critical issues. The purpose of this is to decrease the amount of unnecessary ER visits as well as provide better access for the community. We also have one office with 3 physicians and 3 FNPs that has recently started staying open until 7-7:30 Monday through Friday. Again, the goal is to allow for better patient access.
I could not agree with you more about the Emergency Room being busy with non-emergent patients. This can definitely be due to access. I try to avoid the Emergency Room because I don’t want to pay my $100 deductible. But, in our area, we have a lot of people who are on Medicaid as well. We have many people who frequent the ER and are not responsible for payment or have a co-pay of less than $5. For these people, they get the immediate access that they want, where as many others, like myself, wait until our physician has an opening because we do not want to pay the extreme cost difference.
I know this is opening up a different topic, but it can be very difficult to plan your hospitalization or doctor’s visit based on how your insurance will pay. A few years back, my family was vacationing in Colorado. The first day we got there my three year old didn’t feel well, and I was sure she had another ear infection. I do not like to be one of the nurses who just calls the doctor for her to call in a prescription, so I did not do that. My daughter was in pain with a temperature of 102. To me, even though she was in pain, this did not indicate and ER visit, so we went to the closest Urgent Care instead. Once we got our bill, I noticed we were charged almost $400 for this visit. I called the insurance and discussed this and they told me had we gone to an ER it would have been $100 instead of the $400. I tried to dispute this bill saying that this is what is wrong with healthcare and why our Emergency Departments get abused, but no such luck. I had good insurance, but because of where I was at my access to affordable healthcare was very minimal.
Participation Guidelines
Due Date: First initial posting to the required threaded discussion topic is due by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT. Peer and instructor responses are due by Sunday 11:59 pm MT. All posts for week 8 are due by the close of class on Wednesday 11:59 pm MT. Please note that the late assignment policy does not apply to the threaded discussions.
Total Points Possible: Varies with course, please see specific course syllabus. These guidelines are for a required threaded discussion worth 50 points. Please note that week 8 will be worth only 25 points.
Requirements:
Description of the Assignment
1. Initial posting: This is defined to be the initial post in which the student responds to the required threaded discussion topic. The first posting by a student within the required discussion area is considered to be the initial posting and will be evaluated using the rubric criteria. Scholarship in communication is expected. Required scholarly source(s) provide specific information that thoroughly address the required topic. For the initial posting, one scholarly source must be presented. The scholarly source must be an outside source. The student may use the required course textbook (s), assigned readings and lesson information in the initial post; however, these are not considered outside scholarly sources.
The initial posting must occur before Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT. Initial postings must be at a minimum of 300 words. References do not apply toward word count. ONLY in Week 8, the initial posting must be a minimum of 200 words with a scholarly reference. It remains due by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT
2. Peer responses: As part of the threaded discussion requirements, the student must provide a substantive response to a peer. Substantive responses pose new ideas, ask questions, and/or generally add to the discussion topic in a meaningful and constructive way.
The peer response must occur on a separate day from the initial posting and instructor response (see below). This peer response must occur before Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. This response does not require a scholarly reference unless information is paraphrased and/or direct quotes are used, then APA guidelines apply. Peer responses must be a minimum of 150 words. References do not apply toward word count.
3. Instructor response: The student must respond to an instructor’s follow-up questions. The instructor’s question may be directed to the student or may be a question directed to another student in the section. The response must be comprehensive and scholarly in nature. Instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words. References do not apply toward word count.
The response to the instructor must occur on a day different from the initial post and a day different from the peer response. Responses to the instructor must occur before Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.
4. For week 8 only: Students are expected to post a peer response or an instructor post but are not required to do both. These posts must be a minimum of 100 words. References do not apply toward word count. The peer or instructor response must be on a different day than the initial post and must occur before Wednesday, 11:50 pm MT due to the shorter week.
Posting Requirements:
- The initial posting must be provided before Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.
- The initial posting must have at least one scholarly outside source that is cited within the posting and referenced. Required course textbooks, assigned readings and lesson information are not considered to be outside scholarly sources.
- Initial posting must be a minimum of 300 words; peer responses and instructor responses a minimum 150 words.
- The peer responses and instructor responses must be provided before Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.
- All postings are substantive and relate to the graded threaded discussion topic.
- Only one small quote (15 words or less) within the entire initial posting is accepted.
- Postings must occur on 3 separate days.
- For week 8 only: the required postings are amended due to the shorter week. Two posts are required. One initial post and either a peer response or an instructor response. Initial post must be a minimum of 200 words and the peer or instructor response must be a minimum of 100 words. Both posts are required to be on two separate days. All posts must be made by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT
Criteria for Content
- Scholarliness: In this category, the student will conduct a search of the current databases and locate valid, relevant, and reliable information for the required topic. Each reference must be scholarly.
- Application of Course Knowledge: In this category, the student demonstrates the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge, and information learned in the course lesson and outside readings. This information is then applied to a real-life professional situation as an example.
- Interactive Dialogue: In this category, the minimum requirements are to provide an initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT of each week. In addition, one peer response and one instructor response are required. These postings must be completed by Sunday, 11:59 pm MT of each week. The initial posting, peer response, and instructor response must be on 3 separate days.
- Grammar, Syntax, APA: Proper grammar, APA, and syntax is required for all posts. Students should follow the APA Manual 6th Edition. Additional APA information is available in Course Resources.
- Participation Requirement: One initial posting, one peer response and one instructor response (for a total of 3 posts for the week) are required on 3 separate days.
- Participation Deadline: The student must provide a substantive response to the graded threaded discussion topic. This must be posted by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT of each week. Peer and instructor responses must be posted by Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.
- For week 8 only: the required postings are amended due to the shorter week. Two posts are required. One initial post and either a peer response or an instructor response. Initial post must be a minimum of 200 words and the peer or instructor response must be a minimum of 100 words. Both posts are required to be on two separate days. All posts must be made by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.
- Also Read: NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 4 Discussion Challenges in Lobbying Strategies
Criteria for Format and Special Instructions
- Instructor reserves the right to submit any threaded discussion posting to TurnItIn in order to verify the originality.
- When journals are used as the outside source of information, it is preferred that the journal be peer reviewed. The Chamberlain online librarian is very helpful in assisting you to find an article related to your topic. If you have questions concerning scholarly sources, please refer to the handout entitled “What is a scholarly source” located under “Course Resources” tab
NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 5 Discussion Drivers of High Performance Healthcare Systems .
- Web sites vary in quality and scholarship. It is the responsibility of the student to determine the scholarly nature of the web site. If the instructor determines that the site failed to demonstrate scholarship, points maybe deducted. Students are cautioned to use care regarding .com sites. Some .com sites are excellent such as American Heart Association, but others are built by individuals and scholarliness is lacking. It is recommended that you check with your instructor before using a .com website as a reference.
- Only one small quote (15 words or less) within the entire initial posting is acceptable. It is expected that the student will paraphrase the information when presenting information from a scholarly source. The scholarly source(s) for the paraphrased information must be cited using APA format. Do not include a number of small quotes even if they are just a few words as your instructor considers a quote to be a quote no matter its limited size.
-
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 5 Discussion Drivers of High Performance Healthcare Systems
Grading Rubric
| Performance Category | 100% or highest level of performance
100% 16 points |
Very good or high level of performance
88% 14 points |
Acceptable level of performance
81% 13 points |
Inadequate demonstration of expectations
68% 11 points |
Deficient level of performance
56% 9 points |
Failing level
of performance 55% or less 0 points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Points Possible= 50 | 16 Points | 14 Points | 13 Points | 11 Points | 9 Points | 0 Points |
| Scholarliness
Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics. |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements
|
| 16 Points | 14 Points | 13 Points | 11 Points | 9 Points | 0 Points |
|
| Application of Course Knowledge
Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements
|
| 10 Points | 9 Points | 6 Points | 0 Points | |||
| Interactive Dialogue
Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count) The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count) Responses are substantive and relate to the topic. |
Demonstrated all of the following:
|
Demonstrated 3 of the following:
|
Demonstrated 2 of the following:
|
Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:
|
||
|
8 Points |
7 Points |
6 Points |
5 Points | 4 Points |
0 Points |
|
| Grammar, Syntax, APA
Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error. |
The following was present:
AND
AND
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
| 0 Points Deducted | 5 Points Lost | |||||
| Participation
Requirements |
Demonstrated the following:
|
Failed to demonstrate the following:
|
||||
| 0 Points Lost | 5 Points Lost | |||||
| Due Date Requirements | Demonstrated all of the following:
A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. |
Demonstrates one or less of the following.
A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. |
||||
Grading Rubric Guidelines Week 8 ONLY |
||||||
| Performance Category |
100% or highest level of performance 100% |
Very good or high level of performance
88% |
Acceptable level of performance 81% |
Inadequate demonstration of expectations
68% |
Deficient level of performance
56% |
Failing level of performance
55% or less |
| 8 Points | 7 Points |
6 Points |
5 Points | 4 Points | 0 Points | |
| Scholarliness
Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics. |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements
|
| 8 Points | 7 Points | 6 Points | 5 Points | 4 Points | 0 Points | |
| Application of Course Knowledge –
Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic. |
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements
Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic. |
| Interactive Dialogue
For Week 8 only: Initial post should be a minimum of 200 words (references do not count toward word count) The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 100 words each (references do not count toward word count) Responses are substantive and relate to the topic. |
Demonstrated all of the following:
|
Demonstrated 3 of the following:
|
Demonstrated 2 of the following:
|
Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:
|
||
| 4 Points | 3 Points |
2 Points | 0 Points | |||
| Grammar, Syntax, APA
Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error. |
The following was present:
AND
AND
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
||
| 0 Points | 5 Points Lost | |||||
| Participation Requirements | For Week 8 ONLY:
Demonstrated the following:
|
Failed to demonstrate the following:
|
||||
| 0 Points Lost | 5 Points Lost | |||||
| Requirements | For Week 8 ONLY:
Demonstrated all of the following:
A minimum of one peer or one instructor response is to be posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT |
Demonstrates one or less of the following.
|
||||
NOTE: To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 pm MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 pm MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 pm MT Wednesday of the eighth week.
*Scholarly source: Per the APA Guidelines in Course Resources, only scholarly sources should be used in assignments and threaded discussions. These include peer reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. Your textbook and lesson are not considered to be an outside scholarly source. For the discussions, reputable internet sources such as websites by government agencies (URL ends in .gov) and respected organizations (often ends in .org) can be counted as scholarly sources. The best outside scholarly source to use is a peer reviewed nursing journal. You are encouraged to use the Chamberlain library and search one of the available data bases for a peer reviewed journal article. The following sources should not be used: Wikipedia, Wikis, or blogs. These web sites are not considered scholarly as anyone can add to these. Please be aware that .com websites can vary in scholarship and quality. For example American Heart Association is a .com site with scholarship and quality. It is the responsibility of the student to determine the scholarship and quality of any .com site. Ask your instructor before using any site that you are unsure of. If the instructor determines that the site does not demonstrate scholarship or quality, points will be deducted for not using scholarly sources. Current outside scholarly sources are required for the initial posting. This is defined to be 5 years or less. Instructor permission must be obtained if using a source that is older than 5 years.