coursework-banner

Assignment: NURS 6512 Assessing the Abdomen

Assignment: NURS 6512 Assessing the Abdomen

Walden University Assignment: NURS 6512 Assessing the Abdomen-Step-By-Step Guide

 

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Walden University  Assignment: NURS 6512 Assessing the Abdomen assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

 

How to Research and Prepare for Assignment: NURS 6512 Assessing the Abdomen

 

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Walden University  Assignment: NURS 6512 Assessing the Abdomen depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

 

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

 

How to Write the Introduction for  Assignment: NURS 6512 Assessing the Abdomen

 

The introduction for the Walden University  Assignment: NURS 6512 Assessing the Abdomen is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

 

How to Write the Body for  Assignment: NURS 6512 Assessing the Abdomen 

 

After the introduction, move into the main part of the  Assignment: NURS 6512 Assessing the Abdomen assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

 

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

 

How to Write the Conclusion for  Assignment: NURS 6512 Assessing the Abdomen

 

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

 

How to Format the References List for  Assignment: NURS 6512 Assessing the Abdomen

 

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

 

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the  Assignment: NURS 6512 Assessing the Abdomen assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: Assignment: NURS 6512 Assessing the Abdomen

A woman went to the emergency room for severe abdominal cramping. She was diagnosed with diverticulitis; however, as a precaution, the doctor ordered a CT scan. The CT scan revealed a growth on the pancreas, which turned out to be pancreatic cancer—the real cause of the cramping.

Because of a high potential for misdiagnosis, determining the precise cause of abdominal pain can be time consuming and challenging. By analyzing case studies of abnormal abdominal findings, nurses can prepare themselves to better diagnose conditions in the abdomen.

In this Lab Assignment, you will analyze an Episodic note case study that describes abnormal findings in patients seen in a clinical setting. You will consider what history should be collected from the patients as well as which physical exams and diagnostic tests should be conducted. You will also formulate a differential diagnosis with several possible conditions.

To Prepare

Review the Episodic note case study your instructor provides you for this week’s Assignment. Please see the “Course Announcements” section of the classroom for your Episodic note case study.Assignment NURS 6512 Assessing the Abdomen

With regard to the Episodic note case study provided:

Review this week’s Learning Resources, and consider the insights they provide about the case study.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: Assignment: NURS 6512 Assessing the Abdomen

Consider what history would be necessary to collect from the patient in the case study.

Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. How would the results be used to make a diagnosis?

Identify at least five possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient.

The Assignment

Analyze the subjective portion of the note. List additional information that should be included in the documentation.

Analyze the objective portion of the note. List additional information that should be included in the documentation.

Is the assessment supported by the subjective and objective information? Why or why not?

What diagnostic tests would be appropriate for this case, and how would the results be used to make a diagnosis?

Would you reject/accept the current diagnosis? Why or why not? Identify three possible conditions that may be considered as a differential diagnosis for this patient. Explain your reasoning using at least three different references from current evidence-based literature.

Sample Answer for Assignment NURS 6512 Assessing the Abdomen

CC: “My stomach hurts, I have diarrhea, and nothing seems to help.”

History of Present Illness (HPI): JR is a 47-year-old Caucasian male who came to the hospital complaining of generalized abdominal pain which began three days before the present visit. He denies having taken any drug claiming that she had no idea of what to take. He claims that the severity of the pain currently is 5/10 but was worse of up to 9/10 for the past two days. She has been able to eat properly with the pain but complains of being nauseated afterward.

Medications: Lisinopril 10mg. Amlodipine 5 mg. Metformin 1g. Linctus 10 units qhs

Allergies: No known drug allergies

PMHx: HTN. Diabetes. She has a history of gastrointestinal bleeding which occurred four years ago

PSHx: No past surgical history

Sexual/Reproductive History: He is heterosexual and has three children, two boys, and one girl

Soc Hx: He is married and has three children, two boys, and one girl. Denies ever using tobacco. Confirms alcohol use occasionally.

Significant Fam Hx: He has three children, two boys, and one girl. No family history of colon cancer. The father had a history of type 2 diabetes mellitus and HTN. The mother has a history of HTN, GERD, and hyperlipidemia

Review of Systems:

General: He has been eating properly without any difficulties, despite nausea that comes afterward. He has no fever or loss of appetite.

HEENT: Denies itchy nose, palate, eyes, or ears. No problems with nose bleeding, hearing, ringing sound on the ears.

Skin: Intact skin with no lesions, itchiness, urticarial, Acne, Blistering, Dry skin, hives, Eczema, Moles, Nodules, skin oozing or skin cancer.

Respiratory: No coughing, shortness of breath or hemoptysis. CTA, the walls of her chest are well symmetrical. No history of asthma.

Cardiovascular/Peripheral Vascular: no heart murmurs, chest pain, accumulation of fluid or edema of the legs. Denies pain on palpitation or irregular heartbeats.

Gastrointestinal: Complains of severe generalized abdominal pain which has lasted for three days. Denies decreased in appetite. Confirms nausea after eating. Has a history of blood in stool, four years ago. Denies constipation, heartburn, hematemesis, or rectal bleeding.

Musculoskeletal:  No unsteady gait or deformities. Confirms having a full range of motion and an excellent bilateral strength in all extremities. Denies pain in the joints or fatigue.

Psychiatric: No anxiety, delusion, auditory/visual hallucinations, depressed mood, homicidal disorder, eating disorder, mental or physical abuse, suicidal thoughts or substance abuse.

Neurological: No difficulties in balance, fainting, coordination, or abnormality in gait. Denies loss of strength, or Tingling/Numbness symptoms.

OBJECTIVE DATA:  

P/E:

Vital signs: Temp 99.8; RR 16; BP 160/86; P 92; WT 248lbs; HT 5’10”; BMI 35

Pain: reports abdominal pain severity of 5/10 currently but 9/10 in the last two days. General: The patient is alert and well oriented. The patient can communicate clearly with no difficulties in answering all the questions asked. He maintains good hygiene and seems not to be anxious.

HEENT: pupils are equally dilated, round, bilaterally reactive to light with perfect accommodation. The extraocular movement is intact (EOMI). Clear auditory canal with an intact tympanic membrane. The light reflex presents bilaterally — no signs of enlarged tonsils or mouth wounds.

Skin: The skin is clean and moist, with no signs of scaling, itchiness or moles.

Chest: The thorax is perfectly symmetrical; there are no signs of gross rib deformity. The chest shape and expansion are normal.

Lungs: No diminishing breathing sounds noted, no rales or expiratory wheezes, no rhonchi, wet, and productive cough noted.

Heart:  The heart sounds are normal. No murmurs. Regular heart rate and rhythm. The heart rate is regular with the presence of S1, S2, and absence of S3 or S4.

Peripheral Vascular: No signs of edema, ulcers, varicose veins or deformities. No signs of pedal edema. 2+ dorsalis pedis pulses bilaterally confirmed.

Abdomen: generalized tenderness, hyperactive bowel sounds in all the four quadrants, severe pain on the LLQ. No signs of distention or hernia.

Musculoskeletal: Very steady gait with no deformities. Exhibits full range of motion in all extremities — no pain on movement of joints.

Neurological: Very alert and oriented in a good position. Tolerates appropriately to the tests performed — perfect tone with no history of neurological disorders.

Diagnostics: None

ASSESSMENT:

Pain in the Left lower quadrant of the abdomen.

Gastroenteritis– a viral or bacterial infection of the stomach and intestines causing irritations and inflammation of GI lining. Presents with symptoms such as watery diarrhea, nausea and vomiting, abdominal cramping and pain, fever, and a headache (Mayumi et al., 2016).

Current Diagnosis

The current diagnosis of gastroenteritis is inappropriate due to lack of enough information based on the provided data. It has been supported by limited objective and subjective data, which makes it unacceptable. The advanced practice nurse needs additional subjective and objective data in addition to proper diagnostic lab test result to make a firm diagnosis to avoid the high chances of misdiagnosis (Jamal et al., 2017). These lab tests will also make it possible to differentiate and rule out the following differential diagnosis:

  1. Diverticulitis
  2. Chron’s
  3. Ulcerative colitis
  4. Colon cancer
  5. Gastroenteritis
  6. Food poisoning

Diagnostic Tests Required

For proper diagnosis, the nurse in charge needs to order tests such as colonoscopy, stool occult test, liver function tests, biopsy, and CT scan when necessary. The stool occult tests will provide information confirming the cause of the GI bleeding. The liver function test, on the other hand, will measure the patient’s levels of alanine transferase, albumin, alkaline phosphate, aspartate aminotransferase, and bilirubin to rule out any injuries or liver infections (Othman et al., 2017). The CT scan will provide a proper visual of the abdomen to determine any injuries to any organ, or abnormal growth or any mass blockage within the abdomen. Lastly, the biopsy will determine the actual disease affecting a particular body tissue.

Differential Diagnosis

  1. Diverticulitis: this is a chronic inflammatory condition or infection of small pouches known as diverticular which develop along the intestinal walls. This infection results in small abscess along the intestinal lining together with massive perforations of the bowel (Chuong et al., 2016). It results in cramping of the left side of the abdomen and diarrhea in addition to the presence of bright red blood in the patient’s stool, which is positive in the provided case. Other symptoms include fever, nausea, and
  2. Chron’s: it is a type of inflammatory bowel disease caused by inflammation of the GI tract. It presents mostly with abdominal pain, severe diarrhea and bloody stool of which the patient is positive for (Zafar et al., 2015). Other sign and symptoms include fever, fatigue, mouth sores, anorexia, weight loss and fistula around the anal region.
  3. Ulcerative colitis: It is an inflammatory condition of the colon, rectum or both areas, with ulceration of the colon lining (Bonovas et al., 2018). Patients with this condition usually complain of symptoms such as abdominal pain, severe diarrhea, and bloody stool just like the patient in the above case study. Other symptoms include rectal pain, the urgency to defecate, weight loss, fever, fatigue, and inability to defecate despite the urgency.

PLAN: N/A

References

Mayumi, T., Yoshida, M., Tazuma, S., Mizooka, M., Furukawa, A., Nishii, O., Shigematsu, K., … Hirata, K. (January 01, 2016). The Practice Guidelines for Primary Care of Acute Abdomen 2015. Japanese Journal of Radiology, 34, 1, 80-115.

Jamal, T. A., Edna, T.-H., Jamal, T. A., Edna, T.-H., Endreseth, B. H., Endreseth, B. H., & Lydersen, S. (January 01, 2017). Clinical diagnostic accuracy of acute colonic diverticulitis in patients admitted with acute abdominal pain, a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 32, 1, 41-47.

Othman, A. E., Bongers, M. N., Zinsser, D., Schabel, C., Wichmann, J. L., Arshid, R., Notohamiprodjo, M., … Bamberg, F. (April 13, 2017). Evaluation of reduced-dose CT for acute non-traumatic abdominal pain: evaluation of diagnostic accuracy in comparison to standard-dose CT. Acta Radiologica, 59, 1, 4-12.

Zafar, H. M., Chadalavada, S. C., Kahn, C. E., Cook, T. S., Sloan, C. E., Lalevic, D., Schnall, M. D., … Langlotz, C. P. (September 01, 2015). Code abdomen: An assessment coding scheme for abdominal imaging findings possibly representing cancer. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 12, 9, 947-950.

Chuong, A. M., Corno, L., Beaussier, H., Boulay-Coletta, I., Millet, I., Hodel, J., Taourel, P., … Zins, M. (January 01, 2016). Assessment of Bowel Wall Enhancement for the Diagnosis of Intestinal Ischemia in Patients with Small Bowel Obstruction: Value of Adding Unenhanced CT to Contrast-enhanced CT. Radiology, 280, 1, 98-107.

Bonovas, S., Lytras, T., Nikolopoulos, G., Peyrin-Biroulet, L., & Danese, S. (January 01, 2018). Systematic review with network meta-analysis: comparative assessment of tofacitinib and biological therapies for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 47, 4, 454-465.

Also Read:

NURS 6512 Assignment 1: Digital Clinical Experience: Assessing the Heart, Lungs, and Peripheral Vascular System

NURS 6512 Discussion Musculoskeletal Pain

NURS 6512 Assignment 1: Case Study Assignment: Assessing Neurological Symptoms

NURS 6512 Assignment 3: Digital Clinical Experience: Comprehensive (Head-to-Toe) Physical Assessment

NURS 6512 Assignment Assessing The Genitalia And Rectum

NURS 6512 Assignment Ethical Concerns

NURS 6512 Week 9 Assessment Of Cognition And The Neurologic System

NURS 6512 Assessment Tools and Diagnostic Tests in Adults and Children

NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Case Study Assignment Assessment Tools and Diagnostic Tests in Adults and Children

NURS 6512 Assignment 1: Lab Assignment: Assessing the Genitalia and Rectum

Discussion: NURS 6512 Assessing the Ears, Nose, and Throat

Discussion: NURS 6512 Assessment Tools and Diagnostic Tests in Adults and Children

Discussion: NURS 6512 Effective Communication

NURS 6512 Post an explanation of the specific socioeconomic, spiritual, lifestyle, and other cultural factors associated with the patient you were assigned

Assignment: NURS 6512 Assessment Tools and Diagnostic Tests in Adults and Children

NURS 6512 The Ethics Behind Assessment

NURS 6512 Cognition and the Neurologic System

NURS 6512 Assessment of the Musculoskeletal System

NURS 6512 Assignment Cardiovascular Disease (CVD)

NURS 6512 Abdomen and Gastrointestinal System

NURS 6512 Functional, Cultural and Diversity Awareness in Health

NURS 6512 Building a Comprehensive Health History

NURS 6512 TJ Pregnant Lesbian Essay

NURS 6512 Health History of Tina Jones

NURS 6512 Discussion Week 1 Main Post

NURS 6512 Assignment 2 Focused Exam

NURS 6512 Practice Assessment Skin, Hair, and Nails Examination

NURS 6512 Digital Clinical Experience

NURS 6512 Tools and Diagnostic Tests in Adults and Children

NURS 6512 Episodic/Focused SOAP Note Template

NURS 6512 Discussion Episodic/Focused SOAP Note

NURS 6512 Discussion Adolescent Patients

NURS 6512 how social determinants of health such as age, gender, ethnicity, and environmental situation impact the health and risk assessment of the patients you serve

NURS 6512 The use of nursing theories is critical to patient care because of the different purposes that they serve

NURS 6512 Effective communication is required needed in any patient-healthcare provider interaction

NURS 6512 Primary care is a critical aspect of patient care

NURS 6512 Cultural beliefs played a key role in patient health

NURS 6512 Research the health-illness continuum and its relevance to patient care

NURS 6512 discuss the relevance of the continuum to patient care

NURS 6512 Cultural and linguistic competence

NURS 6512 it is important to treat all patients with respect and dignity despite any differences in race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, sexual orientation, or belief systems

NURS 6512 Assessment tests and tools play an important role in the diagnosis of various diseases conditions in both adults and children

NURS 6512 Allergies

NURS 6512 Health assessment of the skin, hair and nails

NURS 6512 Asthma Diagnosis

NURS 6512 The abdomen and the gastrointestinal system Assignment

NURS 6512 Congestive Heart Failure

NURS 6512 Acute Lateral Ankle Sprain

NURS 6512 Lower Back Pain

NURS 6512 Bilateral Ankle Pain

NURS 6512 Discussion Categories to Differentiate Knee Pain

NURS 6512 Assessing The Neurologic System

NURS 6512 Hypertension

NURS 6512 Comprehensive Physical Assessment

NURS 6512 Assessment of the genitalia and rectum is vital in depicting genitourinary and gastrointestinal abnormalities respectively

NURS 6512 ethical dilemmas Assessment

NURS 6512 History of Present Illness (HPI)

NURS 6512 provision of quality and effective healthcare services to the diverse population

NURS 6512 Discussion comprehensive health history for a patient is important in developing a treatment plan for them

Sample Answer 2 for Assignment NURS 6512 Assessing the Abdomen

The SOAP note portrays a 65-year-old man who comes to the ED with a chief complaint of abdominal pain for the past two years. He has intermittent epigastric abdominal pain radiating to the back. The abdominal pain has worsened over the past hours, and he had one episode of vomiting after lunch. Physical exam findings include abdominal tenderness in the epigastric area with guarding but no abdominal mass or rebound present. The assessment findings are Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA), Perforated Ulcer, and Pancreatitis. The purpose of this assignment is to analyze the SOAP note and discuss the differential diagnoses for this case. 

Subjective Portion 

The HPI lacks information describing abdominal pain, like crampy, sharp, colicky, or dull. It should also have information on when the abdominal pain occurs, like pre- or post-prandial. Information on the abdominal pain relieving and aggravating factors should also be included (Rastogi et al., 2019). Besides, the HPI should have pain severity obtained by asking the patient to rate the pain on a pain rating scale. In addition, the subjective portion should have included the patient’s surgical history with dates of surgery and immunization history with dates of the last Flu and Tdap shots. Furthermore, the subjective portion lacks a review of systems (ROS), which should have the pertinent positives and negatives for all body systems. The ROS helps identify symptoms not stated in the HPI, which helps get a clear picture of the underlying disease.    

Objective Portion 

The objective part of the SOAP note does not have findings from the general assessment. This should include the patient’s general appearance, grooming, level of alertness, apparent state of health, comfort or distress, body language, and eye contact. As an abdominal assessment detailed findings from the abdomen assessment should be provided. This includes inspection findings like scars, abdomen symmetry, pigmentation, and movement with respiration (Rastogi et al., 2019). In addition, auscultation findings, including bowel sounds, vascular sounds, bruits, and friction rubs, should be included. Findings from the percussion of the abdomen, like the stomach, spleen, liver span, and kidney, should have been provided.  

Assessment Portion 

Enlarging aneurysms in AAA often cause flank, abdominal, or back pain. Abdominal palpation findings in AAA can include non-tender, pulsatile abdominal mass. Thus, the patient’s abdominal pain and tenderness support AAA. Clinical manifestations in a perforated ulcer include upper abdominal pain that can be localized to the left upper quadrant, right upper quadrant, or epigastrium (Tarasconi et al., 2020). Abdominal tenderness in the epigastric area supports perforated ulcer. Epigastric abdominal pain, tenderness, and guarding supports pancreatitis (Chatila et al., 2019).  

Appropriate Diagnostic Tests 

Appropriate diagnostic tests for this case include an abdominal ultrasound, complete blood count (CBC), and upper GI endoscopy. The CBC test will be necessary for assessing abdominal inflammation or infection through the WBC count. An abdominal ultrasound will be appropriate to determine the cause of the abdominal pain, including if there is an inflammation of the abdominal organs. In addition, an upper GI endoscopy will be used to detect inflammation and sores/ulcers in the upper GI tract.  

Would You Reject/Accept The Current Diagnosis? 

AAA does not qualify as a primary diagnosis since the patient does not have a non-tender, pulsatile abdominal mass, usually present in symptomatic patients. Besides, AA is usually symptomatic during a rupture, where patients present with constant pain and often get into frank shock (Hellawell et al., 2021). The patient has intermittent abdominal pain and has no signs of shock.  

Possible Conditions That May Be Considered As A Differential Diagnosis 

The possible differential diagnoses for this case are:  

Acute Pancreatitis: Acute pancreatitis manifests with upper abdominal pain that is usually constant and dull. It also presents with nausea, vomiting, tachycardia, fever, hypotension, diarrhea, abdominal distention, tenderness, and muscular guarding (Chatila et al., 2019). Therefore, Acute pancreatitis is a likely diagnosis owing to the clinical manifestations of vomiting, hypotension (BP-91/60), abdominal tenderness, and guarding.  

Acute Cholecystitis: Acute Cholecystitis is the inflammation of the gallbladder. Clinical manifestations include constant abdominal pain in the right upper quadrant, nausea, vomiting, fever, and elevated WBC and C-reactive protein (Mou et al., 2019). This differential is based on positive abdominal tenderness, vomiting, and guarding findings.  

Perforated ulcer: A perforated ulcer is a severe PUD complication. The classic triad of perforated peptic ulcer includes sudden onset of abdominal pain, abdominal rigidity, and tachycardia. Generally, abdominal pain never completely subsides despite premedical remedies (Tarasconi et al., 2020). Other clinical manifestations include nausea, severe dyspepsia, constipation, and fever. A perforated ulcer is a differential based on findings of abdominal pain that do not subside with PPIs, vomiting, and guarding,  

Conclusion 

The subjective portion of the SOAP note requires additional information on the characteristics of abdominal pain, aggravating and relieving factors, and severity of pain. It should also have the patient’s surgical history, immunization history, and ROS. The objective part should have included the general assessment and detailed abdominal assessment findings. The identified possible conditions include Acute pancreatitis, Acute cholecystitis, and Perforated Ulcer.  

 

References 

Chatila, A. T., Bilal, M., & Guturu, P. (2019). Evaluation and management of acute pancreatitis. World journal of clinical cases, 7(9), 1006–1020. https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v7.i9.1006 

Hellawell, H. N., Mostafa, A. M., Kyriacou, H., Sumal, A. S., & Boyle, J. R. (2021). Abdominal aortic aneurysms part one: Epidemiology, presentation, and preoperative considerations. Journal of Perioperative Practice, 31(7-8), pp. 274–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750458920954014 

Mou, D., Tesfasilassie, T., Hirji, S., & Ashley, S. W. (2019). Advances in the management of acute cholecystitis. Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 3(3), 247–253. https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12240 

Rastogi, V., Singh, D., Tekiner, H., Ye, F., Mazza, J. J., & Yale, S. H. (2019). Abdominal Physical Signs of Inspection and Medical Eponyms. Clinical medicine & research, 17(3-4), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.3121/cmr.2019.1420 

Tarasconi, A., Coccolini, F., Biffl, W. L., Tomasoni, M., Ansaloni, L., Picetti, E., … & Catena, F. (2020). Perforated and bleeding peptic ulcer: WSES guidelines. World journal of emergency surgery, 15(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-019-0283-9 

 

Sample Answer 3 for Assignment NURS 6512 Assessing the Abdomen

Gastrointestinal disorders are common encounters in nursing practice with considerable public health impacts. Nurses and other healthcare providers should perform comprehensive history taking and physical examinations to develop accurate diagnoses and care plans. Therefore, this essay examines J.R.’s case study. J.R. presented to the hospital with complaints of having generalized abdominal pain that began three days ago. He has been experiencing diarrhea that has been unresponsive to any treatments adopted by the patient.  The essay analyzes additional subjective and objective information that should be obtained from the client if subjective and objective data supports the assessment, diagnostic tests, and possible differential diagnoses.

Additional Subjective Information

Additional subjective information should be obtained to guide the development of an accurate diagnosis. First, information about the things that might have led to the abdominal pain should be obtained. This includes data such as diet, alcohol consumption, or possible trauma that could have led to the symptoms. Information about previous experiences of stomach pain should also be obtained. A previous history of stomach pain will help the nurse determine if the condition is acute or chronic. In addition, the nurse should determine if JR experienced a similar pain when he experienced gastrointestinal bleeding four years ago. Information on previous treatments for the GI bleed should be obtained to guide the current management. The nurse should also seek information about the characteristics of stomach pain (Maret-Ouda et al., 2020). For example, information on whether the pain radiates elsewhere should have been obtained to rule out causes such as pancreatitis.

Information about the character of the diarrhea should also be obtained. Information such as blood-stained diarrhea would help the nurse to develop a potential diagnosis of gastrointestinal tract bleeding. Associated symptoms such as vomiting should also be obtained. This is important because symptoms such as projectile vomiting will indicate potential problems such as pyloric stenosis. Information about changes in the client’s weight over the past few months should also be obtained. Unintentional weight loss could indicate other health problems such as cancer of the gastrointestinal system. Information on changes in appetite should also be sought. Early satiety could indicate problems such as hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. The nurse should also obtain information about the factors that relieve, precipitate, or worsen the stomach pain. For example, a diagnosis of peptic ulcer disease will be made if the symptoms worsen 15-30 minutes after eating (Sverdén et al., 2019). A diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease will be made if the symptoms worsen when JR lies down and improves with sitting upright.

Additional Objective Information

The nurse should obtain additional objective information from JR to make an informed diagnosis and develop a patient-centered care plan. Firstly, information about JR’s general appearance should be documented. This includes information such as his grooming, weight, alertness, and orientation. A comprehensive review of all the body systems should have also been done. For example, the assessment of the respiratory system is inadequate. Information such as the presence or absence of nasal flaring, wheezes, crackles, rhonchi, and peripheral or central cyanosis should have been documented (Katz et al., 2022). The assessment of the cardiovascular system should have extended to information such as the presence or absence of jugular venous distention or peripheral edema.

The information in the assessment of the gastrointestinal system is inadequate. Additional information such as the presence or absence of abdominal scars, organomegaly, pulsations, ascites, and visible blood vessels should have been documented. This is important because information such as palpable abdominal pulsations would indicate aortic abdominal aneurysm. Information about any abdominal pain on palpation and the location of the pain should have also been obtained and pain rating on a pain rating scale.  The nurse should have also assessed the skin for capillary refill, turgor, cyanosis, and edema (Haque & Bhargava, 2022). Low capillary refill and poor skin turgor could indicate problems with circulation and hydration.

If Subjective and Objective Data Supports the Assessment

Subjective assessment data is the information a patient gives about their health problems. Subjective data supports JR’s assessment. Some of the subjective data include his chief complaints, history of the chief complaints, past medical history, medications, allergies, family, and social history. Objective data refers to the information that the healthcare provider obtains during assessment. Healthcare providers use methods such as inspection, palpation, percussion, and auscultation to obtain objective data (Malik et al., 2023). Objective data supports JR’s case study. Examples of objective data in the case study include vital signs and findings reported in the assessment of the heart, lungs, skin, and abdomen.

Appropriate Diagnostic Tests

Some diagnostic tests should be performed to develop JR’s accurate diagnosis. An occult stool test should be performed to determine if the client’s problem is due to an infection and rule out GI bleeding. A complete blood count test would also be performed to rule out an infection. Stool culture might also be performed to determine the accurate cause of JR’s problem. Antigen tests might also be performed to detect antigens associated with parasites and viruses that cause gastrointestinal problems such as gastroenteritis. A fecal fat test might be needed to rule out malabsorption problems in the client (Chen et al., 2021). Radiological investigations such as abdominal ultrasound and x-rays might be performed to rule out causes such as appendicitis and carcinoma.

Accepting or Rejecting the Current Diagnosis

I will accept the current diagnosis of left lower quadrant pain. The objective findings reveal the presence of left lower quadrant pain. This provisional diagnosis should guide the additional investigations performed to develop an accurate diagnosis. I also accept gastroenteritis as the other diagnosis for JR. Patients with gastroenteritis experience symptoms such as diarrhea, abdominal pain and cramping, nausea, vomiting, and loss of appetite (Chen et al., 2021).  JR has these symptoms; hence, gastroenteritis is his other provisional diagnosis.

Three Possible Differential Diagnoses

Diverticulitis is the first differential diagnosis that should be considered for JR. Diverticulitis is an inflammation of the sigmoid colon that causes left lower quadrant pain. The pain worsens when a patient eats. The accompanying symptoms include diarrhea, constipation, bloating, nausea, and the passage of bloodstained stool (Sugi et al., 2020). Diagnostic investigations will rule in or out diverticulitis as the cause of JR’s problems.

The second differential diagnosis that should be considered for JR is peptic ulcer disease. Peptic ulcer disease is a condition that develops from the destruction of the stomach wall lining by pepsin or gastric acid secretion. It affects the distal duodenum, lower esophagus, or jejunum. Patients often experience epigastric pain 15-30 minutes after a meal. A diagnosis of duodenal ulcer disease is made if the patient reports epigastric pain 2-3 hours after a meal (Malik et al., 2023; Sverdén et al., 2019). The additional symptoms that patients with peptic ulcer disease experience include bloating, abdominal fullness, nausea and vomiting, hematemesis, melena, and changes in body weight.

Gastritis is the last differential diagnosis that should be considered for JR. Gastritis develops from the inflammation of the gastric mucosa. Factors such as infections, smoking, taking too much alcohol, prolonged use of aspirin and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications, and immune-mediated reactions might cause gastritis. Patients who are affected by gastritis experience a range of symptoms. They include stomach pain or upset, hiccups, belching, abdominal bleeding, nausea and vomiting, feeling of fullness, loss of appetite, and blood in stool or vomitus (Maret-Ouda et al., 2020; Rugge et al., 2020). Therefore, additional investigations should be performed to develop JR’s accurate diagnosis and treatment plan.

Conclusion

In summary, JR’s subjective and objective data is inadequate. Additional subjective and objective data should be obtained to guide the treatment plan. Subjective and objective data supports JR’s assessment. I accept the current diagnosis of left lower quadrant pain and gastroenteritis.. Different diagnostic investigations should be performed to rule in and out different differential diagnoses in the case study. The three differential diagnoses that should be considered for JR include gastritis, peptic ulcer disease, and diverticulitis.

 

References

Chen, P. H., Anderson, L., Zhang, K., & Weiss, G. A. (2021). Eosinophilic Gastritis/Gastroenteritis. Current Gastroenterology Reports, 23(8), 13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-021-00809-2

Haque, K., & Bhargava, P. (2022). Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. American Family Physician, 106(2), 165–172.

Katz, P. O., Dunbar, K. B., Schnoll-Sussman, F. H., Greer, K. B., Yadlapati, R., & Spechler, S. J. (2022). ACG Clinical Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. The American Journal of Gastroenterology, 117(1), 27–56. https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000001538

Malik, T. F., Gnanapandithan, K., & Singh, K. (2023). Peptic Ulcer Disease. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK534792/

Maret-Ouda, J., Markar, S. R., & Lagergren, J. (2020). Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Review. JAMA, 324(24), 2536–2547. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.21360

Rugge, M., Sugano, K., Sacchi, D., Sbaraglia, M., & Malfertheiner, P. (2020). Gastritis: An Update in 2020. Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology, 18(3), 488–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11938-020-00298-8

Sugi, M. D., Sun, D. C., Menias, C. O., Prabhu, V., & Choi, H. H. (2020). Acute diverticulitis: Key features for guiding clinical management. European Journal of Radiology, 128, 109026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109026

Sverdén, E., Agréus, L., Dunn, J. M., & Lagergren, J. (2019). Peptic ulcer disease. BMJ, 367, l5495. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l5495

Sample Answer 4 for Assignment NURS 6512 Assessing the Abdomen

Abdominal problems have adverse effects on the health and wellbeing of the patients. Nurses are expected to utilize their knowledge and skills in comprehensive history taking and patient assessment to develop accurate diagnoses and treatment plans for their patients. Therefore, this paper is an examination of J.R’s case study. J.R is a 47-year-old client that has come to the hospital with generalized abdominal pain for the last three days and nausea. The purpose of this paper is to examine the additional subjective and objective information to be obtained from the client, whether the case study has subjective and objective data, diagnostic investigations, and decision related to the developed diagnosis.

Analysis of Subjective Portion

Subjective data relates to that obtained from the patient. It focuses on the experiences of the patient with the health problem. Additional subjective information should be obtained from the patient to come up with an accurate diagnosis and treatment plan. One of the subjective data that should be obtained from the client is quantification of the abdominal pain. Information about the pain rating, severity, character, and relieving, precipitating, and aggravating factors should be obtained. The other aspect of the pain should focus on whether the pain is generalized, radiating to other body parts, or increasing or decreasing in intensity. The pain should also be described in terms of whether it is sudden or gradual.

Moreover, the nature of diarrhea that the client reports should also be quantified. A focus should be placed on aspects such as the frequency of the diarrhea in a given period to determine if they client is dehydrated or not. The additional information about diarrhea include color of stool, relieving, aggravating, and precipitating factors. The provider should also obtain information about the dietary history of the client. Food poisoning could be a factor to consider in this client’s case. As a result, information about recent dietary habits and perceived hygiene of the foods should be obtained to determine the cause of the problem. The hygiene status and source of water that the client drinks should be obtained to ascertain whether the problem is a water-borne disease. Since the client has history of gastrointestinal bleeding, it would be necessary to ask about recent changes in color, smell, and texture of the stool prior to the current problems (Jarvis & Eckhardt, 2019). Such information will aid in ruling out causes such as ulcers of the gastrointestinal system.

Analysis of Objective Position

Healthcare providers obtain objective data using methods such as observation, palpation, percussion, and auscultation. The data is important in confirming or validating the subjective data given by the patient. Additional objective data should be obtained from the client. They include the general appearance of the client during the first encounter with the healthcare provider. The healthcare provider should provide a description of the grooming, energy levels, body weight, and if the patient is dehydrated or not.  The provider should have also assessed the patient for hydration status and jaundice by checking on skin turgor and sclera for jaundice. The patient should have also provided comprehensive abdominal assessment to determine whether there is distention, bowel movements, organomegally, distention of veins, and scars. The provider should have also palpated the abdomen for tenderness, rigidity, or any rebound tenderness. The information could have helped rule out causes such as bowel obstruction and organomegally (Jarvis, 2019). The objective data could have facilitated the development of an accurate diagnosis for the client.

Analysis of the Assessment

Objective and subjective data support the assessment of JR. Examples of subjective data that supports the assessment include information about diarrhea, nausea, stomach pains, past medical, medication, allergies, family, and social histories. Examples of objective data include the vitals and heart, lungs, skin, and abdominal findings.

Diagnostic Tests

Stool test is the most appropriate diagnostic investigation for JR. Stool analysis should be performed to determine if the client has an infection or the cause could be due to gastrointestinal bleeding. Blood tests such as complete blood count are also recommended to determine if the client has low hemoglobin level due to bleeding or elevated white blood cell count to indicate infection. Since the client has a history of gastrointestinal bleeding, it would be appropriate to perform abdominal ultrasound to determine the actual cause of the problem (Jarvis & Eckhardt, 2019).

Rejecting/Accepting the Diagnosis

I would accept the current diagnosis. Patients with gastroenteritis experience symptoms similar to those of JR. The symptoms include abdominal cramps, vomiting, nausea, and diarrhea. The infection is short-term, implying symptom resolution over time. JR reports that the pain severity has declined, implying a potential symptom resolution in gastroenteritis. He also complains of diarrhea, abdominal pain, and nausea, hence, the decision to accept the diagnosis (Bányai et al., 2018). The differential diagnoses to be considered include abdominal obstruction, colon cancer, and inflammatory bowel disease. The above differentials have patients experiencing either nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, or abdominal pains. However, it may not be abdominal obstruction due to the presence of diarrhea and absence of abdominal distention. Diagnostic investigations such as abdominal ultrasound are needed to rule out colon cancer. The patient does not have any predisposition to environmental triggers, hence, ruling out inflammatory bowel disease (Guan, 2019).

Conclusion

Subjective and objective data guide the diagnoses developed for health problems affecting patients. JR is likely to be suffering from gastroenteritis. Additional subjective and objective data is however needed to develop an accurate diagnosis. Diagnostic investigations should be used to develop accurate diagnosis for the patient.

 

References

Bányai, K., Estes, M. K., Martella, V., & Parashar, U. D. (2018). Viral gastroenteritis. The Lancet, 392(10142), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31128-0

Guan, Q. (2019). A Comprehensive Review and Update on the Pathogenesis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Journal of Immunology Research, 2019, e7247238. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7247238

Jarvis, C. (2019). Physical Examination & Health Assessment Access Code. Elsevier Health Sciences.

Jarvis, C., & Eckhardt, A. (2019). Physical Examination and Health Assessment. Elsevier.