NU 502 Discussion 4
NU 502 Discussion 4
NU 502 Discussion 4
The main stakeholders based on the article are residents affected by lack of policies on smoking and the effects of secondhand smoke, the regulatory authorities comprising of local and state government agencies, and the general public in outdoor settings impacted by activities of smokers.
Answer to Q#2
The authors do a good job in their efforts to provoke policy change as they carry out a comprehensive analysis of existing literature to demonstrate evidence and the need for new approaches to the smoking problem. The authors demonstrate that policy changes in public health requires evidence-backed interventions that allow policymakers to understand the effects of an issue. The authors show that changes in policy need support across different areas; socioeconomic spectrum to ensure that there is acceptability and embracing of new way of doing things (Cook et al., 2014). For instance, the authors demonstrate that immense public support compels policymakers to enact measures to protect the vulnerable, like in this case, the elderly citizens.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NU 502 Discussion 4
Answer to Q#3
I think this policy change has the ability to influence changes in other locations and facilities since public health
NU 502 Discussion 4
measures focus on protecting the general public and many individuals that may be impacted by certain habits like smoking. Studies show that policy changes in one place or facility lead to changes in others as such actions focus on giving a uniform approach to issues that affect many people (Kegler et al., 2018). For example, smoke-free policies exist in different parts of the country due to research evidence and efforts by policymakers to enact such measures for the overall good of the majority.
Answer to Q#4
The next steps in this program of research and policy is to implement such measures and assess their effectiveness after a while by conducting comprehensive surveys. The changes in policy are essential in attaining better public health measures and preventing disease conditions.
References
Cook, N. J., Hollar, L., Chavez, S., Quinn, D. L., Phillips, T., DeLucca, M., & Corrales, L.
(2014). Support for smoke-free multi-unit housing policies among racially and ethnically diverse, low-income seniors in south Florida. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 29(4), 405-415. DOI:10.1007/s10823-014-9247-4
Kegler, M. C., Lebow-Skelley, E., Lea, J., Lefevre, A. M., Diggs, P., Herndon, S., & Haardörfer,
- (2018). Peer Reviewed: Developing Smoke-Free Policies in Public Housing: Perspectives from Early Adopters in 2 Southern States. Preventing chronic disease, 15. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd15.170427