NUR 550- Translation Research and Population Health Management Week 4 Discussion
Grand Canyon University NUR 550- Translation Research and Population Health Management Week 4 Discussion-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University NUR 550- Translation Research and Population Health Management Week 4 Discussion assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NUR 550- Translation Research and Population Health Management Week 4 Discussion
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University NUR 550- Translation Research and Population Health Management Week 4 Discussion depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NUR 550- Translation Research and Population Health Management Week 4 Discussion
The introduction for the Grand Canyon University NUR 550- Translation Research and Population Health Management Week 4 Discussion is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for NUR 550- Translation Research and Population Health Management Week 4 Discussion
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NUR 550- Translation Research and Population Health Management Week 4 Discussion assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NUR 550- Translation Research and Population Health Management Week 4 Discussion
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NUR 550- Translation Research and Population Health Management Week 4 Discussion
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NUR 550- Translation Research and Population Health Management Week 4 Discussion assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
DQ1 How does epidemiology helps in researching and addressing population health challenges? Provide a specific contemporary example.
Sample Answer for NUR 550- Translation Research and Population Health Management Week 4 Discussion
Reliability and validity are integral concepts in research design, on which the quality of data and the overall validity of research findings depend. Reliability is a measure of consistency: it gauges how well measurements remain stable over time, across different instruments or raters, or within a single measurement instrument, and is typically assessed through methods such as inter-rater reliability or test-retest reliability (Cevik, 2019). Validity, on the other hand, denotes whether a study is measuring what it set out to measure. A valid research study establishes that its results accurately reflect their intended objectives. Overall, when applied together, reliability and validity provide researchers with invaluable information necessary to critically evaluate research outcomes (Sürücü & Maslakçi, 2020).
Translational Research Article
Zolotarova, T., Dussault, C., Park, H., Varsaneux, O., Basta, N. E., Watson, L., … & Kronfli, N. (2023). Education increases COVID-19 vaccine uptake among people in Canadian federal prisons in a prospective randomized controlled trial: The EDUCATE study. Vaccine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.01.040
The methods section of the study effectively outlined its design, sample size, and data analysis techniques. The prospective randomized controlled trial used is widely considered the gold standard for research studies, and the sample size was optimal to detect a 10% increase in vaccination rate with a level of significance of 0.05 and 80% power (Zolotarova et al., 2023). Appropriate data analysis techniques were employed to reach their statistically significant results, demonstrating that this study can be viewed as reliable and valid.
In summary, it is essential for a reliable study to capture accurate results that can stand the test of time. To achieve this, researchers must implement a well-thought-out methodology and make sure that their data is evaluated carefully. Statistical techniques should be applied in order to both obtain as much useful information from the data as possible, but also to steer clear of any potential bias or errors caused by improper analysis. It is also important that the sample size is large enough so that the results will remain consistent if the study was implemented again. Finally, standardized measures or procedures are needed to ensure that the results are consistent regardless of variables such as location and type of respondent. Indeed, producing reliable studies requires focusing on multiple aspects of how it is conducted and its results interpreted.
References
Cevik, M. (2019). Multidimensional 21st Century Skills Scale: Validity and Reliability Study. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 14(1), 11-28. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1211726.pdf
Sürücü, L., & Maslakçi, A. (2020). Validity and reliability in quantitative research. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 8(3), 2694-2726. : http://dx.doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v8i3.1540
Zolotarova, T., Dussault, C., Park, H., Varsaneux, O., Basta, N. E., Watson, L., … & Kronfli, N. (2023). Education increases COVID-19 vaccine uptake among people in Canadian federal prisons in a prospective randomized controlled trial: The EDUCATE study. Vaccine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.01.040
Sample Answer 2 for NUR 550- Translation Research and Population Health Management Week 4 Discussion
Reliability and validity are both ways of measuring results of a study. Reliability refers to how consistent and reliable results are, and whether those same results could be reproduced using the same methods (Bannigan & Watson, 2009). Validity refers to how accurately a research method actually measures what it set out to measure (Bannigan & Watson, 2009). The study I wish to examine the reliability and validity of involves a randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of applying soft silicone dressings such as Mepilex Border to the sacral area of critically ill patients in the ICU as a preventative measure against pressure injuries.
The study included 440 trauma and critically ill patients admitted to the ED and subsequently transferred to the ICU. These patients participated in a trial designed as a prospective open-label randomized controlled trial, which means that participants were chosen at random to receive the intervention, and both participants and researchers knew which group the patient was in or which intervention they were receiving (Santamaria, et al., 2015). The study discusses the specific inclusion criteria that must be met for patients to participate, as well as the intervention participants would receive. The study does have fairly solid validity, as it set out to measure whether the addition of Mepilex Border dressings to the sacral area helps prevent pressure injuries, and that is exactly what the results include. Overall the methods described in the study are reliable and replicable with one exception. The study described the control group as receiving “usual pressure ulcer prevention strategies”, but does not specifically list what those usual strategies are. While pressure injury prevention strategies are grossly the same across organization or even countries, variances can occur. I feel like the preventative care the control group is receiving should be described as specifically as the trial group so that the results can be replicated, especially since the trial group is receiving that preventative care plus the application of the dressing. Those wishing to implement this intervention within their own organizations would need to know what those specific preventative measures are so they can also determine if anything additional might be beneficial to patients in preventing pressure injuries.
References:
Bannigan, K., & Watson, R. (2009). Reliability and validty ina nutshell. Journal of Clinical Nursing. Retrieved from chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://my.enmu.edu/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=299fd446-72fa-4e09-9681-51825a0cb1b7&groupId=4153058&filename=sbbannigan-nur502.pdf
Santamaria, N., Gerdtz, M., Sage, S., McCann, J., Freeman, A., Vassilou, T., . . . Knott, J. (2015). A randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness of soft silicone multi‐layered foam dressings in the prevention of sacral and heel pressure ulcers in trauma and critically ill patients: the border trial. International World Journal, 12(3), 302-308. Retrieved from https://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.lopes.idm.oclc.org/pmc/articles/PMC7950350/
DQ2 Research a health concern that impacts a population with which you are familiar. How do biostatistics affect the research focus? How do you define the population as your patient? Make sure to include the population and health concern.
Sample Answer 3 for NUR 550- Translation Research and Population Health Management Week 4 Discussion
Nursing education is theory driven. Theories are derived from the humanities, sciences, and Biblical concepts. Nursing knowledge, theory, research, and health promotion are influenced by spiritual perspectives, and ethical, legal, political, historical, and social influences. The faculty values excellence in teaching with an individual focus on the learner. Teaching includes a variety of methods, learning modalities, and practice situations. Faculty provide opportunities for students to give comprehensive care to diverse client populations, and the learning environment is created and arranged to meet individual learning outcomes that are consistent with the College of Nursing and Health Care Professions program outcomes. The College of Nursing and Health Care Professions supports life-long learning endeavors and fosters an appreciation of diversity among traditional and nontraditional learners. Students are educated to provide, direct, and evaluate client-centered care while focusing on the person as an integrated whole.
Sample Answer 4 for NUR 550- Translation Research and Population Health Management Week 4 Discussion
The type of data collection approach or technique that one utilizes significantly contributes to the quality of the research findings based on the credibility and validity. Data collection tools and techniques should be valid and reliable to attain findings that can be translated effectively into clinical practice and patient interventions. Based on the research topic on medication errors, the most effective data collection tool would be content analysis and observation (Diptyanusa et al., 2020). The approach would involve reviewing current evidence from papers and document that identified causes and components of medication errors. Observation would involve observing the nursing staff in their administration of medications during their shifts to see any forms of errors and what causes them and document the findings.
Barriers in during data collection are inevitable. For instance, limited resources and cooperation with patients as well as inconsistencies in data results are potential barriers that may arise during this time. Translational research can assist offer strategies on overcoming these hurdles. Through translational research, one can gather sufficient evidence on such barriers and develop right interventions in time for better data collection. The translational research type two (T2) is the most effective as it offers a chance for one to learn concerning the effectiveness of their interventions (Titler, 2018). Knowledge attain using T2 research helps to identify the basis of clinical applications, validity, and reliability of data collection tools. Again, evidence-based guidelines also determine the selection of a given intervention.
The most effective strategies in this case include getting collaborative support and sensitization of stakeholders through offering sufficient information on the benefits of having translational research implemented in their settings. Through these strategies, stakeholders will appreciate the essence of the approach and the selection of the research topic. Again, the use of these approaches will allow stakeholders to participate and offer input for effective implementation of the interventions.
References
Diptyanusa, A. & Hasanbasri, M. (2020). Lost in translation: Barriers and progress in harnessing
basic medical science into community practice in Indonesia. Translational Medicine Communications, 5, 16. DOI:10.1186/s41231-020-00070-1
Titler, M. G. (2018). Translation Research in Practice: An Introduction. Online Journal of Issues
in Nursing, 23(2), 1. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.3912/OJIN.Vol23No02Man01
ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS
Discussion Questions (DQ)
Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.
Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.
One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.
I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.
Weekly Participation
Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.
In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.
Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).
Also Check Out: NUR 550 -Translation Research and Population Health Management Week 3 Discussion
Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.
ALSO READ: NUR 550- Translation Research and Population Health Management Week 5 Discussion
APA Format and Writing Quality
Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).
Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.
I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.
Use of Direct Quotes
I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.
As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.
It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.
LopesWrite Policy
For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.
Late Policy
The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.
Communication
Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.