NUR 590 Evidence Based Practice Project Week 7 Discussion
Grand Canyon University NUR 590 Evidence Based Practice Project Week 7 Discussion-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University NUR 590 Evidence Based Practice Project Week 7 Discussion assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NUR 590 Evidence Based Practice Project Week 7 Discussion
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University NUR 590 Evidence Based Practice Project Week 7 Discussion depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NUR 590 Evidence Based Practice Project Week 7 Discussion
The introduction for the Grand Canyon University NUR 590 Evidence Based Practice Project Week 7 Discussion is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for NUR 590 Evidence Based Practice Project Week 7 Discussion
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NUR 590 Evidence Based Practice Project Week 7 Discussion assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NUR 590 Evidence Based Practice Project Week 7 Discussion
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NUR 590 Evidence Based Practice Project Week 7 Discussion
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NUR 590 Evidence Based Practice Project Week 7 Discussion assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
NUR 590 Evidence Based Practice Project Week 7 Discussion
Week 7 Discussion
DQ1 Identify the audience for your EBP proposal and discuss strategies for disseminating the proposal.
Disseminating evidence to stakeholders and decision makers within the organization is crucial to getting the proposed solution implemented throughout the organization. The evidence must have evidence based research that supports the proposed solution and must show how the solution will improve the performance of the organization. After the completion of a research or evidence based project, the information must be disseminated amongst the staff. The purpose behind performing a research project or evidence based project is to create change and to advance patient care. The information that is distributed amongst the staff is quite important. Having a dissemination plan is so vital because there are barriers. The barriers can involve not having the education or information readily available, costs of disseminating the information to staff, and staff being resistant to the new change or information.
There are two ways to disseminate an evidence-based practice project proposal which are either internal or external. Evidence-based practice (EBP) findings are disseminated by transmitting data and actions to significant public healthcare or clinical research population. The fundamental aim of dissemination is to enhance and promote evidence-based strategies, to increase their implementation and patient experience. One internal strategy to disseminate evidence-based practice is the hospital board. Employees of the health organization, such as nurses, physicians, and other professionals involved in patient care, make up the hospital board. The most proper technique to employ when disseminating the EBP to the hospital board would be face to face. The method encourages engagement and immediate response, particularly during questioning sessions(M, 2019). The presenting procedure at professional organization conferences, notably the American Nurses Association, would be an external technique. The professional association would be an excellent venue for disseminating the initiative to a considerable number of nurses. Face-to-face consultation and conversation with other nursing experts would be the approach utilized in the conference. Internal and external communication techniques would differ.
Using a dissemination plan tool will assist the researcher in locating all of the components required to create a formal dissemination plan that specifically reflects the user’s needs and interests (Carpenter, Nieva, Albaghal, & Sorra, 2014). The tool includes six useful components for effectively disseminating research findings. Define the research, identify target users, collaborate with dissemination partners, communicate the research, communicate the research, evaluate the success of the dissemination process, and develop an action plan are the components (Carpenter, Nieva, Albaghal, & Sorra, 2014). Using the tool will benefit not only the researcher but also the staff members who will be receiving the new information. Investors and donors are examples of external stakeholders. Internal stakeholders to contact include executives and managers.
Reference:
Carpenter,D., Nieva, V., Albaghal, T. & Sorra, J. (2014). Development of a Planning Tool to Guide Research Dissemination. Retrieved from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK20603/
Dissemination is spreading evidence-based practice information to a variety of clinical settings to increase understanding and adoption of new or changed evidence-based practice. Proposing evidence-based practice projects in a diverse but related setting allows for the uptake of stakeholder support that would increase resources to conduct more complex studies and implement enhanced interventions. Stakeholders are very important as not only can studies require financial backing for equipment, clinical resources and personnel, but also require stakeholders that can understand the gravity a project or proposal has on improving patient related health outcomes (Cunningham-Erves, Mayo-Gamble, Vaughn, Hawk, Helms, Barajas & Joosten, 2020).
Health care facilities, specifically the outpatient/public nutrition department, would be the primary internal stakeholders for my evidence-based project. To obtain consents and access to the target population, a health care facility’s approval would be required, and because consent and privacy must be followed ethically, approval from a health care facility may already have detailed policies regarding such proposals. Because the project is focused on nutrition, direct communication with administration and the nutrition department will be essential for maintaining stakeholder trust (Warren, Constantinides, Blake & Frongillo, 2021).
External stakeholders include those who provide assistance outside of the health care facility, such as local or public dieticians/nutritionists, patients, and public education programs. You can also include digital or virtual stakeholders who are willing to support structured and guided approaches to diet modification and nutritional information using technology. While direct communication can be facilitated for public services and patients, technical stakeholder support for improvements and utilization may necessitate technical communication (Warren, Constantinides, Blake & Frongillo, 2021).
Also Read: NUR 590 Evidence Based Practice Project Week 6 Discussion
Dissemination of an evidence-based practice (EBP) project proposal and collected results is a crux in the process of disseminating the information with aim to improve care at the bedside. According to AHRQ (2012), a collaborative process must occur that includes care providers, patients, and other stakeholders in order to effectively and meaningfully disseminate gathered data from the research study. This is with intention to include all invested parties, and explore the most effective means to make meaningful change in a positive way. This process reviews the benefits, diagnoses, alternatives, treatments and outcomes of the proposed intervention.
According to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ, 2012), a primary goal of EBP dissemination includes accessibility to stakeholders, and providing specific translation techniques to allow for better focus and accurate information shared. Internally, these stakeholders for my EBP practice project of reducing CLABSIs by implementation of a care bundle may include the chief nursing leadership, executive hospital leadership, hospital management, supply chain, quality and data scientists as well as the frontline caregivers. Externally, stakeholders may include hospital board members, community partners (i.e. long-term care facilities and others who care for patients with a long-term central line, such as a dialysis port) and others.
There are various methods available for communicating the valuable findings of an EBP project. However, it is critical to spend time assessing the audience, intention, approach and presentation of the information, if it is to be received well and accurately (AHRQ, 2012). For example, focusing on the promotion of health and reducing patient harms as designated by the National Patient Safety Network is a key driver I should highlight in my communication. Additionally, a systematic review of my research would be valuable to both internal and external stakeholders. This includes comparing the research, evaluating my processes, reviewing the validity and reliability of the study, how it was performed and how I arrived at my results and discussion. Acknowledging shortcomings up front is also important, as to avoid any false sense of believing the intervention will fix all. The research translation process will cover these topics in various formats, such as presentations, round-table discussions, online sharing and more. Overall, it is essential that an EBP researcher provide many options for stakeholders to review the learned information, and assist in the decisions as to “what’s next?”
References
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2012). Communication and dissemination strategies to facilitate the use of health-related evidence. Research Protocol, 1(1), 1-25. medical-evidence-communication_research-protocol.pdf (ahrq.gov)