NURS 6501 Knowledge Check: Neurological and Musculoskeletal Disorders
Walden University NURS 6501 Knowledge Check: Neurological And Musculoskeletal Disorders-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Walden University NURS 6501 Knowledge Check: Neurological And Musculoskeletal Disorders assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NURS 6501 Knowledge Check: Neurological And Musculoskeletal Disorders
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Walden University NURS 6501 Knowledge Check: Neurological And Musculoskeletal Disorders depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NURS 6501 Knowledge Check: Neurological And Musculoskeletal Disorders
The introduction for the Walden University NURS 6501 Knowledge Check: Neurological And Musculoskeletal Disorders is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for NURS 6501 Knowledge Check: Neurological And Musculoskeletal Disorders
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NURS 6501 Knowledge Check: Neurological And Musculoskeletal Disorders assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NURS 6501 Knowledge Check: Neurological And Musculoskeletal Disorders
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NURS 6501 Knowledge Check: Neurological And Musculoskeletal Disorders
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NURS 6501 Knowledge Check: Neurological And Musculoskeletal Disorders assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for NURS 6501 Knowledge Check: Neurological And Musculoskeletal Disorders
Alzheimer’s is one of the most common progressive neurological disorders among the elderly caused by dementia. Patients will present with mild to moderate cognitive signs and symptoms at the onset of the disorder, which will progress to severe memory loss with time, as they grow much older (Li et al., 2019). However, several treatment options have been proven to be effective in the management of Alzheimer’s disorder among the elderly. The purpose of this discussion is to illustrate the decision process in selecting the most effective drug, based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic factors, for treating an elderly patient diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease.
Patient Case Study Summary
The assigned case study demonstrates a 76-year-old Iranian male with symptoms of Alzheimer’s disorder. The patient displays strange behavior upon arrival at the clinic reporting symptoms of memory loss, forgetfulness, confusion, and diminished interest in religious activities for the last 2 years. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic patient factors which contributed to the selection of drugs for this patient include his advanced age, male gender, Iranian race, and presenting symptoms in addition to the mini-mental exam results of moderate dementia. the patient’s diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disorder will also be considered.
Treatment Decisions
Based on the patient history and the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic factors mentioned above, the most appropriate intervention is to initiate Exelon 1.5mg twice daily. Exelon (rivastigmine) is an FFDA-approved drug for treating mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease (Fish et al., 2019). Previous studies support great effectiveness, and safety profile for use of the drug among the elderly diagnosed with Alzheimer’s (Khoury et al., 2018). The second decision was to increase the dose of Exelon to 4.5 mg twice daily as recommended by most clinical practice guidelines for patients who have displayed great tolerance but with minimal effectiveness. The last decision was to increase the dose further to 6mg twice daily, to promote optimal effectiveness as the patient still displayed limited remission of symptoms with the previous intervention.
Expected Outcome
Studies show that Exelon when administered appropriately takes between 8 to 12 weeks to completely manage symptoms of Alzheimer’s among elderly patients. As such, with the initial intervention of 1.5mg Exelon twice daily, the patient was expected to display approximately 50% remission of symptoms (Nguyen et al., 2021). The dose was however to be titrated to obtain the optimum outcome, not exceeding 6mg twice daily. The same results were expected with the second and third interventions with no side effects expected.
Difference Between Expected Outcome and Actual Outcome
Just like expected, the patient displayed a minimal reduction of symptoms of Alzheimer’s with no side effects reported with the first intervention. After the dose was increased in the second intervention, the patient reported further remission of symptoms, but at a slow rate, hence increasing the dose in the last intervention, which led to optimal remission of Alzheimer’s symptoms just as expected (Huang et al., 2020).
Conclusion
Alzheimer’s is a common disorder among the elderly compromising their quality of life and well-being. For the patient in the provided case study, it was necessary to administer Exelon at a starting dose of 1.5 mg which was titrated to 4.5mg then 6.5mg twice daily. The patient displayed great effectiveness with this medication in the management of his Alzheimer’s symptoms, with no side effects reported.
References
Fish, P. V., Steadman, D., Bayle, E. D., & Whiting, P. (2019). New approaches for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 29(2), 125-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2018.11.034
Huang, L. K., Chao, S. P., & Hu, C. J. (2020). Clinical trials of new drugs for Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of biomedical science, 27(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12929-019-0609-7
Khoury, R., Rajamanickam, J., & Grossberg, G. T. (2018). An update on the safety of current therapies for Alzheimer’s disease: focus on rivastigmine. Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety, 9(3), 171-178. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042098617750555
Li, D. D., Zhang, Y. H., Zhang, W., & Zhao, P. (2019). Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the efficacy and safety of donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine, and memantine for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Frontiers in neuroscience, 13, 472. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00472
Nguyen, K., Hoffman, H., Chakkamparambil, B., & Grossberg, G. T. (2021). Evaluation of rivastigmine in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurodegenerative Disease Management, 11(1), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.2217/nmt-2020-0052
Sample Answer 2 for NURS 6501 Knowledge Check: Neurological And Musculoskeletal Disorders
-
Question 1
4 out of 4 points
Scenario 1: GoutA 68-year-old obese male presents to the clinic with a 3-day history of fever with chills, and Lt. great toe pain that has gotten progressively worse. Patient states this is the first time that this has happened, and nothing has made it better and walking on his right foot makes it worse. He has tried acetaminophen, but it did not help. He took several ibuprofen tablets last night which did give him a bit of relief. HPI: hypertension treated with Lisinopril/HCTZ . SH: Denies smoking. Drinking: “a fair amount of red wine” every week. General appearance: Ill appearing male who sits with his right foot elevated. PE: remarkable for a temp of 100.2, pulse 106, respirations 20 and BP 158/92. Right great toe (first metatarsal phalangeal [MTP]) noticeably swollen and red. Unable to palpate to assess range of motion due to extreme pain. CBC and Complete metabolic profile revealed WBC 15,000 mm3 and uric acid 9.0 mg/dl. Diagnoses the patient with acute gout. Osteoporosis is a condition in which an individual’s bone is brittle. This is due to the bone unable to keep up with the process of new bone formation in balance with bone mineral removal. There are many risks involved with having this disease process such as easy fractures, and severe back issues like compression of vertebras. Risk factors for osteoporosis include family history, female, excessive alcohol, diet deficient in calcium and vitamin D, and many more. The nurse may educate patient on the disease process as well as screen the patient for complications. The nurse can educate the patient on a diet low in caffeine, alcohol, provide resources for exercises for bone strength as well as a diet that supports healthy bone. Question:Explain the pathophysiology of gout. |
|||||||||
|
-
Question 2
4 out of 4 points
Scenario 1: Gout
A 68-year-old obese male presents to the clinic with a 3-day history of fever with chills, and Lt. great toe pain that has gotten progressively worse. Patient states this is the first time that this has happened, and nothing has made it better and walking on his right foot makes it worse. He has tried acetaminophen, but it did not help. He took several ibuprofen tablets last night which did give him a bit of relief.
HPI: hypertension treated with Lisinopril/HCTZ .
SH: Denies smoking. Drinking: “a fair amount of red wine” every week. General appearance: Ill appearing male who sits with his right foot elevated.
PE: remarkable for a temp of 100.2, pulse 106, respirations 20 and BP 158/92. Right great toe (first metatarsal phalangeal [MTP]) noticeably swollen and red. Unable to palpate to assess range of motion due to extreme pain. CBC and Complete metabolic profile revealed WBC 15,000 mm3 and uric acid 9.0 mg/dl.
Diagnoses the patient with acute gout. Question:Explain why a patient with gout is more likely to develop renal calculi. |
|||||||||
|
-
Question 3
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6501 Knowledge Check: Neurological and Musculoskeletal Disorders
4 out of 4 points
Scenario 2: OsteoporosisA 78-year-old female was out walking her small dog when her dog suddenly tried to chase a rabbit and made her fall. She attempted to try and break her fall by putting her hand out and she landed on her outstretched hand. She immediately felt severe pain in her right wrist and noticed her wrist looked deformed. Her neighbor saw the fall and brought the woman to the local ER for evaluation. Radiographs revealed a Colles’ fracture (distal radius with dorsal displacement of fragments) as well as radiographic evidence of osteoporosis. A closed reduction of the fracture was successful, and she was placed in a posterior splint with ace bandage wrap and instructed to see an orthopedist for follow up. Question:Discuss what is osteoporosis and how does it develop pathologically? |
|||||||||
|
-
Question 4
4 out of 4 points
Scenario 3: Rheumatoid ArthritisA 48-year-old woman presents with a five-month history of generalized joint pain, stiffness, and swelling, especially in her hands. She states that these symptoms have made it difficult to grasp objects and has made caring for her grandchildren problematic. She admits to increased fatigue, but she thought it was due to her stressful job. FH: Grandmothers had “crippling” arthritis. PE: remarkable for bilateral ulnar deviation of her hands as well as soft, boggy proximal interphalangeal joints. The metatarsals of both of her feet also exhibited swelling and warmth. Diagnosis: rheumatoid arthritis. Question:The pt. had various symptoms, explain how these factors are associated with RA and what is the difference between RA and OA? |
|||||||||
|
-
Question 5
4 out of 4 points
Scenario5: Multiple Sclerosis (MS)A 28-year-old obese, female presents today with complaints for several weeks of vision problems (blurry) and difficulty with concentration and focusing. She is an administrative para-legal for a law firm and notes her symptoms have become worse over the course of the addition of more attorneys and demands for work. Today, she noticed that her symptoms were worse and were accompanied by some fine tremors in her hands. She has been having difficulty concentrating and has difficulty voiding. She went to the optometrist who recommended reading glasses with small prism to correct double vision. She admits to some weakness as well. No other complaints of fevers, chills, URI or UTI PMH: non-contributoryPE: CN-IV palsy. The fundoscopic exam reveals edema of right optic nerve causing optic neuritis. Positive nystagmus on positional maneuvers. There are left visual field deficits. There was short term memory loss with listing of familiar objects. DIAGNOSIS: multiple sclerosis (MS). Question:Describe what is MS and how did it cause the above patient’s symptoms? |
|||||||||
|
-
Question 16
Needs Grading
A 22-year-old male is in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) following a motor vehicle crash (MVC) where he sustained multiple life-threatening injuries including a torn aorta, ruptured spleen, and bilateral femur fractures. He has had difficulty maintaining his mean arterial pressure (MAP) and has required various vasopressors. He has a triple lumen central venous catheter (CVC) for monitoring his central venous pressure, administration of medications and blood products, as well as total parenteral nutrition. Per hospital protocol, he is receiving an unfractionated heparin 1:1000 flush after administration of each of the triple antibiotics that have been ordered to maintain patency of the lumens. Seven days post injury, the APRN in the SICU is reviewing the patient’s morning labs and notes that his platelet count has dropped precipitously to 50,000 /mm3 from 148,000/mm3 two days ago. The APRN suspects the patient is developing heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT).
Question 1 of 2:
What is underlying pathophysiology of heparin induced thrombocytopenia? |
|||||||||
|
-
Question 17
Needs Grading
A 22-year-old male is in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) following a motor vehicle crash (MVC) where he sustained multiple life-threatening injuries including a torn aorta, ruptured spleen, and bilateral femur fractures. He has had difficulty maintaining his mean arterial pressure (MAP) and has required various vasopressors. He has a triple lumen central venous catheter (CVC) for monitoring his central venous pressure, administration of medications and blood products, as well as total parenteral nutrition. Per hospital protocol, he is receiving an unfractionated heparin 1:1000 flush after administration of each of the triple antibiotics that have been ordered to maintain patency of the lumens. Seven days post injury, the APRN in the SICU is reviewing the patient’s morning labs and notes that his platelet count has dropped precipitously to 50,000 /mm3 from 148,000/mm3 two days ago. The APRN suspects the patient is developing heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT).
Question 2 of 2:
The APRN assesses the patient and notes there is a decreased right posterior tibial pulse with cyanosis of the entire foot. The APRN recognizes this probably represents arterial thrombus formation. How does someone who is receiving heparin develop arterial and venous thrombosis? |
|||||||||
|
Sample Answer 3 for NURS 6501 Knowledge Check: Neurological And Musculoskeletal Disorders
Alzheimer’s is one of the most common types of dementia among the elderly. It is a progressive disorder that starts presenting with mild memory loss (Shah, & Bennett, 2020). This disorder affects parts of the brain which control an individual’s thoughts, memory, and language. It can seriously impair the patient’s ability to conduct routine daily activities.
Summarize the Patient Case Study
The patient in the case study provided is 76 years old who was presented to the clinic by his eldest son as a result of strange behaviors. He started displaying symptoms of Alzheimer’s about two years ago. He lost interest in religious activities and started getting confused and forgetful. When Mini-Mental State Exam was administered, his score suggested moderate dementia.
Treatment Decisions
The first decision was to start Exelon (rivastigmine) 1.5 mg orally twice a day, which was to be increased to 3mg twice a day in two weeks. Based on the treatment outcome, the dose of Exelon was increased to 4.5 mg orally twice a day after 4 weeks. The last decision was to increase the dose further to 6 mg twice a day and observe the clinical outcome for the next four weeks. Rivastigmine is a cholinesterase inhibitor approved by the FDA as the first-line medication for managing symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease (Morant, Vestergaard, Lassen, & Navikas, 2020). Studies show that the recommended starting dose of Exelon is 1.5mg, to assess the patient’s tolerance, after which the dose can be increased to 3mg in two weeks. The dosage can however be increased to 4.5 mg then 6 mg depending on the patient’s tolerance and treatment outcome.
Expected Outcome
With the first decision, the patient was expected to display more than 50% remission of Alzheimer’s symptoms (Grossberg, Tong, Burke, & Tariot, 2019). Increasing the dosage in the second intervention was even expected to display further management of symptoms, as the last decision was expected for the patient’s symptoms to be completely managed.
Difference Between Expected and Actual Outcome
The first treatment outcome was quite different from what was expected as the patient’s symptoms did not improve. The second and last outcomes were exactly as expected as the patient displayed no side effects with well-controlled symptoms (Atri, 2019).
References
Morant, A. V., Vestergaard, H. T., Lassen, A. B., & Navikas, V. (2020). US, EU, and Japanese regulatory guidelines for development of drugs for treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: Implications for global drug development. Clinical and Translational Science, 13(4), 652-664. https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.12755
Grossberg, G. T., Tong, G., Burke, A. D., & Tariot, P. N. (2019). Present algorithms and future treatments for Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 67(4), 1157-1171. DOI: 10.3233/JAD-180903
Atri, A. (2019). The Alzheimer’s disease clinical spectrum: Diagnosis and management. Medical Clinics, 103(2), 263-293. DOI: 10.1016/j.mcna.2018.10.009.
Shah, R. C., & Bennett, D. A. (2020). Physicians and Alzheimer dementia: past, present, and future. Annals of internal medicine, 172(10), 695-696. https://doi.org/10.7326/M20-1500
Also Read:
NURS 6501 Module 5 Assignment: Case Study Analysis
NURS 6501 Knowledge Check Concepts Of Psychological Disorders
NURS 6501 Knowledge Check Women’s and Men’s Health, Infections, and Hematologic Disorders
NURS 6501 Module 7 Assignment: Case Study Analysis
NURS 6501 Knowledge Check Concepts Of Pediatrics
NURS 6501 Knowledge Check Pediatrics
NURS 6501 Module 1 Assignment: Case Study Analysis
NURS 6501 Advanced Pathophysiology Week 1 Discussion
NURS 6501 side effects of the transplant procedure and the medications administered Assignment
NURS 6501 Musculoskeletal, metabolic, and multisystem health dysfunctions
NURS 6501 Syndrome of Antidiuretic Hormone (SIADH)
NURS 6501 Explain what ALL is?
NURS 6501 Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
NURS 6501 Immune Thrombocytopenia Purpura (ITP) Pathophysiology