NURS 6512 Assessing Musculoskeletal Pain
Walden University NURS 6512 Assessing Musculoskeletal Pain-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Walden University NURS 6512 Assessing Musculoskeletal Pain assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NURS 6512 Assessing Musculoskeletal Pain
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Walden University NURS 6512 Assessing Musculoskeletal Pain depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NURS 6512 Assessing Musculoskeletal Pain
The introduction for the Walden University NURS 6512 Assessing Musculoskeletal Pain is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for NURS 6512 Assessing Musculoskeletal Pain
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NURS 6512 Assessing Musculoskeletal Pain assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NURS 6512 Assessing Musculoskeletal Pain
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NURS 6512 Assessing Musculoskeletal Pain
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NURS 6512 Assessing Musculoskeletal Pain assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6512 Assessing Musculoskeletal Pain
Sample Answer for NURS 6512 Assessing Musculoskeletal Pain
Patient Information:
F.P., age 46, Caucasian female
Subjective:
CC: Pain to both ankles, but more concerned about the right ankle
HPI: F.P. is a 46-year-old Caucasian female that presents with bilateral ankle pain. She is more concerned about the right ankle as she heard a “pop” while she was playing soccer over the weekend. She can uncomfortably bear weight to the right ankle. Patient describes the pain as achy and throbbing at times, over the lateral aspect of the right ankle. She currently rates the pain as a 4/10 at rest, and a 7/10 with ambulation. She did elevate and ice the right ankle after the injury. She has taken ibuprofen intermittently for pain relief with moderate results. The pain occasionally radiates approximately 4 inches up the lateral aspect of the right lower extremity. There was immediate swelling to the right ankle after the pop. Her left ankle bothers her at times, with an intermittent pain score of 3-4/10; however, there is no acute change to the left ankle at this time.
Current Medications:
- Birth control pills
- Effexor 37.5 mg p.o. daily for depression
- OTC ibuprofen 600 mg p.o. Q6H prn, pain
Allergies: Denies allergies to drugs, food and latex. Denies environmental allergies.
PMHx: She receives a flu vaccine annually. She has been vaccinated for COVID-19. She received all childhood immunizations appropriately and was last vaccinated with a tetanus booster in 2017.
1) Depression, well-controlled on Effexor
2) C-section x 1
Soc Hx: Patient is married and has one child, age 13. She is a cashier at a local nursery. She was an athletic as a child. She does not smoke, drink, or use recreational drugs. She maintains her health playing soccer with friends and lifting weights 3 x a week. She drinks one cup of coffee daily. Her diet is plant-based. She has been a vegetarian for 10 years.
Fam Hx: Mother is 79, alive and well, with history of severe rheumatoid arthritis, depression, HTN. Father is 82, alive and well, with history of prostate cancer (in remission), mental health disorders (unspecified), HTN, HLD. She has one brother who is 53, alive and well, with “undiagnosed mental health disorders” but it otherwise healthy. Her son, age 13, is healthy. Health history of deceased grandparents include arthritis, colon cancer, prostate cancer, HTN, cirrhosis r/t alcoholism, HLD.
ROS:
GENERAL: Denies weight loss, fever, chills, weakness or fatigue.
HEENT: Denies headaches, changes to vision, hearing, taste, or smell.
SKIN: Denies rash or itching, easy bruising, or poor wound healing.
CARDIOVASCULAR: Denies chest pain, chest pressure or chest discomfort. No palpitations or edema. Denies paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea and orthopnea. Denies exercise intolerance.
PERIPHERAL VASCULATURE: Denies easy bruising, pain to calves, blood clots, or history of aneurysms.
MUSCULOSKELETAL: Endorses bilateral ankle pain, right greater than left, with swelling to right lateral ankle and difficulty bearing weight. She denies prior joint stiffness, bony deformities, decreased range of motion to bilateral ankles or any other joints.
NEUROLOGIC: Denies history of CVA or TIA, headaches, dizziness, concussion, seizures, weakness, vertigo, numbness and tremors.
MENTAL HEALTH: Reports history of depression which is well-controlled. She reports stable mood. Denies sleep disturbances, irritability, difficulty concentrating, and mood swings.
Objective:
Physical exam:
Vital signs: BP 128/64, HR 70, RR 17, temp 97.9˚F, pulse ox 99% on room air. Height: 5’5”, weight: 123. BMI: 20.5
General: well-developed, well-nourished 46-year-old Caucasian female in mild discomfort related to right ankle pain. She is pleasant and cooperative.
HEENT: Head is normocephalic and atraumatic. PERRLA, EOMI. Sclera anicteric.
Skin: Warm and dry. No noted rashes, wounds, lesions, or excess bruising. There is bruising to right lateral ankle.
Neck: Supple. Full range of motion.
Chest: lungs clear to auscultation. No cough or dyspnea. Heart regular, S1, S2 appreciated without murmurs, rubs, or gallops. No edema noted aside from right lateral ankle.
Peripheral vasculature: Bilateral dorsalis pedis pulses +2, Bilateral posterior tibial pulses +2, bilateral popliteal pulses +2, bilateral femoral pulses +2.
Musculoskeletal System: Right lateral ankle swollen, with decreased range of motion, weakness, and tenderness with palpation to lower aspect of fibula and surrounding ligaments (anterior and posterior tibiofibular ligaments, posterior and anterior talofibular ligaments, and calcaneofibular ligament) as well as lateral malleolus. There is generalized bruising to the lateral aspect of the right ankle. Medial aspect of right ankle non-tender, without bony deformities or bruising. Left ankle without swelling, bruising, overt tenderness with palpation. No noted deformities or decreased range of motion to joints of toes, knees, hands, or fingers. Spine is straight. Patient is able to bear weight on the right foot, with pain. Gait is disturbed due to pain.
Diagnostic results: Right ankle radiograph, if indicated by Ottawa ankle rules; Ankle ultrasound, if indicated; Stress tests to bilateral ankles, if indicated.
Assessment:
Differential Diagnoses:
1) Right ankle inversion sprain
2) Peroneal tendon disorders
3) Chronic ankle instability
4) Ehlers-Danlos syndrome
5) Avulsion fracture of right ankle
Introduction
Ankle injuries constitute a large portion of healthcare visits orthopedic providers, emergency rooms, and urgent care centers. The ankle is highly susceptible to acute injury given its range of motion, high quantity of bones, ligaments, and tendons, and the fact that the ankles bear the weight of the entire body. The structures that could be involved in lateral ankle pain include the anterior and posterior tibiofibular ligaments, anterior and posterior talofibular ligaments, and calcaneofibular ligament, as well as the peroneus longus and peroneus brevis muscles and their tendons, the lateral malleolus, calcaneus, talus, and fibula bones. Damage to these structures from acute muscle strains, ligamental sprains, or fractures, as well as some chronic disorders will be discussed.
Right Ankle Inversion Sprain
Ankle sprains occur with activity. They range from mild to severe and result from inversion or eversion of the foot. According to Ireland (2017), 19.4% of women’s soccer game injuries are related to the ankle. Our patient was playing soccer when she heard a pop that was followed by pain and difficulty walking. Using the Ottawa Ankle Rules, we can determine if a radiograph is warranted. The Ottawa Ankle Rules were created to eliminate unnecessary ankle radiographs by identifying criteria that could rule out a fracture of the foot or ankle without x-ray (Bachmann et al., 2003). The assessment includes determining if the patient can walk 4 steps immediately after injury, or at the emergency department, and bony tenderness over lateral and medial malleolus, 5th metatarsal, and navicular bones; an ankle x-ray is indicated if the patient cannot bear weight, or there is any bony tenderness (Bachmann et al., 2003). Based on these criteria, and the fact that our patient can walk, albeit painfully, it would not be indicated to assess her ankle via ankle radiograph. Ankle sprains are associated with pain and swelling which this patient endorses. The fact that this patient complains of bilateral ankle pain leads one to consider an acute injury to the right and an underlying disorder of both ankles. This will be discussed further.
Peroneal Tendon Disorders
Due to the patient’s complaints of bilateral ankle pain, other disorders should be considered as an underlying cause. According to Davda et al. (2017), it is often difficult to distinguish a lateral ankle sprain from abnormalities of the peroneal tendons. These tendons run just inferior to the lateral malleolus and along the side of the foot. They attach the tendons of the peroneus longus and peroneus brevis muscles to bones in the lateral aspect of the mid-foot. They function to stabilize the lateral foot and evert the foot (Davda et al., 2017). This group of disorders include tendonitis/tenosynovitis, subluxation and/or dislocation of the tendon, or tendonous tears or splits (Davda et al., 2017). Examination of the ankle and foot should include assessing the lateral ankle ligaments listed above, as well as assessing foot type and palpating the peronei, in conjunction with radiography, MRI and ultrasound to confirm diagnosis (Davda et al., 2017).
Chronic Ankle Instability
Another condition to be considered in this case is chronic ankle instability. If this patient has a history of multiple ankle sprains, her ankles may have become chronically unstable, predisposing her to acute inversion injuries. According to Radwan et al. (2016), a diagnosis can be made if the patient has symptoms of pain, swelling, clinical instability, injury and re-injury, to the lateral aspect of the ankle(s), for greater than 6 months. While this is very common in children and young adult athletes, it can also affect older adults’ quality of life. Arthroscopy, MRI, CT, radiographs, and ultrasounds can be used to diagnose this condition and grade the level of injury (Radwan et al., 2016).
Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) is a genetic disorder affecting the connective tissues. If this is suspected, it would be important to question the patient on any history of her family members having similar issues or those described below. There are several subtypes of EDS and thus presentation may be different among patients and difficult to isolate to the syndrome itself. Potential signs include tissue fragility (from easy bruising and impaired wound healing, to GI bleeds and CV events), generalized hypermobile joints (all four limbs and axial skeleton), and hyperextensible skin (excessive stretchiness to skin in three of four areas: distal forearms, neck, knees, dorsum of hands, elbows) (Miller & Grosel, 2020). Further assessment of our patients’ other limb joints and spine would be required as well as examination of skin elasticity. Genetic testing can confirm all subtypes except hEDS (Miller & Grosel, 2020). In addition to measuring the stretch of the skin in the above listed areas, a Beighton score may be calculated to identify generalized joint hypermobility, but there are no other identifying clinical tests to confirm diagnosis (Miller & Grosel, 2020).
Avulsion Fracture
A final differential diagnosis that could be applied to the painful right ankle is an avulsion fracture. This occurs at the sight where a tendon attaches to bone, causing a bone fragment to tear away. The bones that may be affected in the lateral ankle include the lateral malleolus, lateral border of the talus, and 5th metatarsal (Vannabouathong et al., 2018). This fracture can be diagnosed with radiography. The fact that our patient can walk on her injured right foot makes this the least likely diagnosis.
Conclusion
It is likely this patient has sprained her right ankle. Her reports of pain and difficulty walking after playing soccer, during which she heard her ankle pop, makes this the most likely diagnosis. Consideration needs to be taken to the fact that she complained of bilateral ankle pain. This could represent an underlying condition like arthritis, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, or a peroneal tendon disorder. It is less likely she has an avulsion fracture of the right ankle due to the fact that she can bear weight on the foot.
References
Bachmann, L., Kolb, E., Koller, E., Steurer, J., & ter Riet, G. (2003). Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules to
exclude fractures of the ankle and mid-foot: systematic review. British Medical Journal, 326,
1-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7386.417
Davda, K., Malhotra, K., O’Donnell, P., Singh, D., & Cullen, N. (2017). Peroneal tendon
disorders. EFORT Open Reviews, 2(6), 281-292. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.2.160047
Ireland, M.D., M. (2017, February 1-5). Ankle Injuries: Presentation, work-up, differential diagnosis, and
treatment [Conference session]. ACSM Team Physician Course-Part II: Essentials of sports
medicine: From sideline to the clinic, San Diego, CA, United States.
http://forms.acsm.org/tpc2017/PDFs/10%20Ireland.pdf
Miller, E. & Grosel, J. (2020). A review of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Journal of the American
Academy of Physician Assistants, 33(4), 23-28.
doi: 10.1097/01.JAA.0000657160.48246.91
Radwan, A., Bakowski, J., Dew. S., Greenwald, B., Hyde, E., & Webber, N. (2016).
Effectiveness of ultrasonography in diagnosing chronic lateral ankle instability: A
systematic review. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy, 11(2), 164-174.
Vannabouathong, C., Ayeni, O., & Bhandari, M. (2018). A narrative review on avulsion
fractures of the upper and lower limbs. Clinical Medicine Insights: Arthritis and
Musculoskeletal Disorders, 11, 1-10. doi: 10.1177/1179544118809050
A 15-year-old Caucasian male Justin Timberland presents to the clinic with reports of dull pain in both knees. He states sometimes one or both knees click, and he describes a catching sensation under the patella.
To start assessing my patient’s knee pain, I’ll approach the interview with “a useful framework to differentiate whether the limb pain involves symptoms caused by musculoskeletal injury, musculoskeletal or joint disease, systemic disease, or a combination of factors.” Pain can be caused by a direct reaction in tissues, a secondary reaction in adjacent tissues, a proximal or distal lesion, or organs such as the heart or kidney.” (Dains,2019.p.1.) . Knowing this, I decided to begin with a Focused history, in which I would ask the patient questions such as, does he have any of the common childhood bone diseases that would make him prone to bone injury or pain, i.e. Osteogenesis Imperfecta, also known as brittle bone disease, as it is usually diagnosed at birth as a bone is broken during the delivery process, from the fetus traveling down the bony structures of the birth canal? I’ll then ask him if the pain is the result of an injury. If it was an injury, how did it happen? Is this a new injury, or is it a recurrence of an old one? Finally, I’ll ask him to rate his pain on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being the least pain and 10 being the most pain.
Chief Concern (CC): I’ve been having dull pain in both of my knees, and I have also noticed that my knee and sometimes both of them click.”
History of Physical Illness (HPI): 15-year-old male patient presents today with a history of dull pain in both knees. The patient is concerned that one or both knees intermittently click, and he feels something catch below the patella (Walden University, n.d.).
Additional History Needed to Determine Cause of Knee Pain:
As a future APRN, it would be important to know if the patient’s pain is acute or chronic. I would use a mnemonic, such as OLDCARTS, to guide me as I interview the patient (Ball et al., 2019). Questions that I would want to know from the patient would include: Does the clicking sound occur with knee movement? How often does the clicking sound occur? Has the patient sustained any recent injuries? I would be interested to know what makes the pain worse and better. Additionally, I want to know the treatments the patient has used for his knee pain (e.g., rest, ice [or heat], elevate, immobilize, non-steroid inflammatory drugs, or acetaminophen). I would conduct the interview with the parent or caregiver out of the room, and then with the patient’s permission, ask the parent for more information.
Categories to Differentiate Knee Pain:
There are different categories to differentiate knee pain: bones, cartilage, ligaments, muscles, and tendons (National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases [NIAMS], n.d.). Each of these categories has conditions with clinical presentations, such as arthritis (bones and cartilage), chondromalacia and meniscus injury (cartilage), anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments injuries (ligament), tendinitis (tendon), and more (NIAMS).
Medications:
• Name, dosage, frequency, indication for taking medication, and last dosage should be noted.
• Medications should include prescribed, over the counter, vitamins, minerals, supplements, and complementary alternative medications (Ball et al., 2019).
Past Medical History (PMH):
• Recent trauma
• Cancer
• Connective tissue disorders (e.g., Marfan’s syndrome)
• Juvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis
• Hemophilia
• Osteoporosis
• Renal
• Neuromuscular disorders
• Neurological disorders
Past Surgical History (PSH):
• Orthopedic surgeries or procedures, such as arthroplasty
Family History [FH]: (Ball et al., 2019)
• Arthritis
• Abnormalities of the hips, knees, or feet
• Osteogenesis imperfecta
• Hypophosphatemia
• Hypercalciuria
• Marfan’s Syndrome
Social History (SH)
Information needs to be collected regarding the patient’s usage of tobacco products, alcohol, or illicit drugs. It is essential to get a baseline assessment of the patient’s usual activity of daily living. Is the patient involved in organized sports (e.g., soccer, football, baseball, basketball, martial arts)? I would also gather information about the patient’s average diet, including a balanced diet with protein and nutrients to help heal his condition.
Allergies:
• Allergies to prescribed medications, over-the-counter medications, vitamins, minerals, and supplements should be noted with the type of reaction and severity.
Immunizations:
• Review of current immunizations that should include last T-dap, Influenza, and COVID-19 boosters, and vaccines.
Review of Systems (ROS)
General
• Recent fatigue, malaise, fever, chills, night sweats, unusual bruising, unusual bleeding, and unintentional weight loss will need to be asked of the patient.
Cardiovascular:
• Inspection, percussion, palpation, and auscultation of the heart are part of all focused episodic exam.
Pulmonary:
• Inspection, percussion, palpation, and auscultation of the lungs are also part of a focused episodic exams.
Musculoskeletal:
• Inspection, percussion, palpation, and auscultation of both knees will be performed.
Physical Examination Performed (Ball et al., 2019)
• Inspect knees for symmetry, concavity, and contour in the flexed and extended positions.
• Observe the patient’s lower legs for alignment, specifically the femur and tibial angle should be at or less than 15 degrees to rule out either genu valgum or genu varum.
• Palpate popliteal and joint space in the flexed and extended positions.
• Test the patient’s range of motion (e.g., flexion-130 degrees, extension-0 to 15 degrees).
• Test the patient’s strength during flexion and extension while providing oppositional force against movement.
Anatomic Structures Being Assessed (Ball et al., 2019)
• Patella
• Meniscus
• Anterior and Posterior Cruciate Ligaments
• Lateral and Medial Ligaments
Special Maneuvers Performed (Lee et al., 2017; Ball et al., 2019)
• Hughston’s Plica Test
• Strutter Test
• Ballottement test
• Bulge test
• McMurray Test
• Apley Test
• Thessaly Test
• Anterior and Posterior Drawer Test
• Lachman Test
• Varus and Valgus Stress Tests
Objective
Vital Signs: (VS) height, weight, body/mass index (BMI), or vital signs
General: patient’s race, patient’s preference for gender identity will be ascertained.
Cardiovascular: The patient’s heart sounds (e.g., nl S1, nl S2, S3, S4), murmurs (e.g., type and location), adventitious sounds, clubbed fingers, capillary refill, jugular vein distension, carotid bruits or thrills, pedal edema would be noted in this section.
Pulmonary: Breath sounds in all areas of the anterior and posterior lungs (e.g., bronchial, bronchovesicular, vesicular, dull, resonant, and hyper-resonant) would be noted.
Musculoskeletal- symmetry, skin condition (e.g., bruising), swelling, pain with range of motion, and effusion around knee should be noted.
Diagnostic Tests:
• Radiograph of knees would be indicated this patient if it was determined his condition was secondary to an acute knee injury with the following findings: tenderness at fibula head, patella tenderness that is isolated, and the inability of the patient to flex his knee at a 90-degree angle (Ball et al., 2019). The patient has bilateral knee pain, which decreases the probability of malignancy; however, I would consult with my preceptor regarding ordering X-rays of his knees to rule out bony pathology.
• An MRI may be indicated if the patient has an injury to the medial or lateral meniscus and to the anterior or posterior cruciate ligaments (Rastegar et al., 2016). I would consult with my preceptor if the patient had a positive McMurray test before ordering an MRI. Additionally, if the patient’s symptoms did not improve with therapy, I would again consult with my preceptor about ordering an MRI for this patient.
• CBC with differential-if indicated depending on the patient’s H&P (Thatayatikom, 2021).
• Sedimentation rate-if indicated depending on the patient’s H&P (Thatayatikom, 2021).
• Anti-nuclear antibody test- if indicated depending on the patient’s H&P (Thatayatikom, 2021).
• Rheumatoid factor- if indicated depending on the patient H&P’s (Thatayatikom, 2021).
Assessment
Differential Diagnosis according to Song et al. (2018); Lee et al. (2017):
1. Synovial Infrapatellar Plica Syndrome of the knee is associated with anterior knee pain and clicking or popping sounds (Casadei & Kiel, 2021). The authors report that plica, a thick fibrotic band of tissue extending from a synovial joint, most commonly the knee[s] becomes inflamed due to overuse. Bilateral anterior knee pain is common. This patient has clicking sounds with pain around the knees. This diagnosis needs to be supported by more evidence from the history and physical of the patient.
2. Medial or Lateral Meniscal Tears are associated with knee sounds such as clicking, catching, and locking around the knee (Bhan, 2020). The author reports meniscal tears are common, and MRIs are inevitably required to confirm a diagnosis. This patient has bilateral clicking noise and a sensation of catching to the back of his knees.
3. Patellar Tendinopathy, commonly referred to as ‘Jumpers Knee’ is caused by small tears to the patella tendon that can be painful (Santana et al., 2021). The authors note this condition is seen with sporting activities that require jumping. The patient is complaining of dull pain in both knees. It is essential to gather more subjective and objective data from this patient and possibly his parents for an accurate working diagnosis.
4. Patellofemoral pain syndrome is characterized by anterior knee pain reproduced with running, climbing, and squatting (Bump & Lewis, 2021). The authors report patients generally describe an achy pain located around the knee. This diagnosis is part of the differential because the patient is experiencing pain around the knee. However, more information is required to give a presumptive diagnosis.
5. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Sprain or Tear is considered the most common injury to a knee ligament associated with sporting activities such as football, soccer, and basketball (Evans & Nielson, 2021). The authors state that the injury sustained to the ACL is most commonly a non-contact injury seen with skiers, soccer players, and basketball players from rotational movements. Patients generally complain of a popping sound and the knee giving out (Evans & Nielson). The patient is not complaining of a popping sound but rather a clicking sound with a catching sensation under the patella. This diagnosis is less likely because of the patient’s clinical presentation.
6. Juvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis (JRA) is diagnosed in patients younger than 16 years of age with joint and soft tissue pain (Thatayatikom, & Modica, 2021). An inflammatory, autoimmune process must be considered, especially if there is a family history of autoimmune disorders.
7. Osteochondrosis is also known as Osgood Schlatter disease, is a frequent cause of adolescent knee pain (Smith & Varacallo, 2020). The authors state it is caused by repetitive athletic movements seen more often in boys 12 to 14 years of age. They report that patients complain of anterior knee pain caused by microvascular tears and swelling when a piece of the tendon pulls away from the patella (NIAMS, n.d.). This diagnosis is less likely because the patient is complaining of dull bilateral pain to the knees, and he is not complaining of a bony bump to his kneecap, which is common with this disorder.
Primary Diagnosis/Presumptive Diagnosis
• Synovial Infrapatellar Plica Syndrome.
Plan
This section is not required for the assignment in this course (NURS 6512) but will be required for future courses.
References
Ball, J.W., Dains, J.E., Flynn, J.A., Solomon, B.S., & Stewart, R.W. (2019). Seidel’s guide to
physical examination: An interprofessional approach, (9th ed.). Elsevier.
Bhan, K. (2020). Meniscal tears: Current understanding, diagnosis, and management. Cureus,
12(6), e8590. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7359983/
Bump, J.M., & Lewis, L. (2021, May 8). Patellofemoral syndrome. In: StatPearls. StatPearls
Publishing. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557657/
Casadei, K., & Kiel, J. (2021, April 19). Plica syndrome. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK535362/
Evans, J., & Nielson, J.L. (2021, February 19). Anterior cruciate ligament knee injuries. In:
StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK499848/
Lee, P., Nixon, A., Chandratreya, A., & Murray, J.M. (2017). Synovial plica syndrome of the
knee: A commonly overlooked cause of anterior knee pain. Surgery Journal, 3(1), e9-e16. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1598047
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases. (n.d.). Knee problems.
https://www.niams.nih.gov/health-topics/knee-problems#tab-symptoms
Rastegar, S., Motififard, M., Nemati, A., Hosseini, N.S., Tahririan, M.A., Rozati, S.A., Sepiani,
M., & Moezi, M. (2016). Where does magnetic resonance imaging stand in the diagnosis of knee injuries? Journal of Research in Medical Sciences: The Official Journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, 21,(52).
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6512 Assessing Musculoskeletal Pain
https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-1995.187256
Santana, J.A., Mabrouk, A., & Sherman, A.L. (2021, March 17). Jumpers Knee. In: StatPearls.
StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK532969/
Smith, J.M., & Varacallo, M. (2020, July 29). Osgood Schlatter disease. In: StatPearls,
StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK441995/
Song, S.J., Park., C.H., Liang, H., & Kim, S.J. (2018). Noise around the knee. Clinics in
Orthopedic Surgery, 10(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2018.10.1.1
Thatayatikom, A., & Modica, R., & de Leucio, A. (2021, January). Juvenile idiopathic arthritis.
In: StatPearls, StatPearls Publishing. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK554605/
Walden University. (n.d.). Case 3: Knee pain: Advanced health assessment. www.waldenu.edu.
Also Read:
NURS 6512 Assignment 1: Case Study Assignment: Assessing Neurological Symptoms
Discussion: NURS 6512 Assessing Neurological Symptoms
NURS 6512 Assignment Neurological Symptoms
NURS 6512 Assignment 3: Digital Clinical Experience: Comprehensive (Head-to-Toe) Physical Assessment
NURS 6512 Comprehensive (Head-to-Toe) Physical
NURS 6512 Assignment Assessing The Genitalia And Rectum
NURS 6512 Assignment Ethical Concerns
NURS 6512 Week 9 Assessment Of Cognition And The Neurologic System
NURS 6512 Assessment Tools and Diagnostic Tests in Adults and Children
NURS 6512 Assignment 1: Lab Assignment: Assessing the Genitalia and Rectum
Discussion: NURS 6512 Assessing the Ears, Nose, and Throat
Discussion: NURS 6512 Assessment Tools and Diagnostic Tests in Adults and Children
Discussion: NURS 6512 Effective Communication
Assignment: NURS 6512 Assessment Tools and Diagnostic Tests in Adults and Children
NURS 6512 The Ethics Behind Assessment
NURS 6512 Cognition and the Neurologic System
NURS 6512 Assessment of the Musculoskeletal System
NURS 6512 Assignment Cardiovascular Disease (CVD)
NURS 6512 Abdomen and Gastrointestinal System
NURS 6512 Functional, Cultural and Diversity Awareness in Health
NURS 6512 Building a Comprehensive Health History
NURS 6512 TJ Pregnant Lesbian Essay
NURS 6512 Health History of Tina Jones
NURS 6512 Discussion Week 1 Main Post
NURS 6512 Assignment 2 Focused Exam
NURS 6512 Practice Assessment Skin, Hair, and Nails Examination
NURS 6512 Digital Clinical Experience
NURS 6512 Tools and Diagnostic Tests in Adults and Children
NURS 6512 Episodic/Focused SOAP Note Template
NURS 6512 Discussion Episodic/Focused SOAP Note
NURS 6512 Discussion Adolescent Patients
NURS 6512 Effective communication is required needed in any patient-healthcare provider interaction
NURS 6512 Primary care is a critical aspect of patient care
NURS 6512 Cultural beliefs played a key role in patient health
NURS 6512 Research the health-illness continuum and its relevance to patient care
NURS 6512 discuss the relevance of the continuum to patient care
NURS 6512 Cultural and linguistic competence
NURS 6512 Health assessment of the skin, hair and nails
NURS 6512 The abdomen and the gastrointestinal system Assignment
NURS 6512 Congestive Heart Failure
NURS 6512 Acute Lateral Ankle Sprain
NURS 6512 Bilateral Ankle Pain
NURS 6512 Discussion Categories to Differentiate Knee Pain
NURS 6512 Assessing The Neurologic System
NURS 6512 Comprehensive Physical Assessment
NURS 6512 ethical dilemmas Assessment
NURS 6512 History of Present Illness (HPI)
NURS 6512 provision of quality and effective healthcare services to the diverse population
Case 3: Knee Pain
Photo Credit: University of Virginia. (n.d.). Normal Knee Anatomy [Photograph]. Retrieved from http://www.med-ed.virginia.edu/courses/rad/ext/7knee/01anatomy.html. Used with permission of University of Virginia.
A 15-year-old male reports dull pain in both knees. Sometimes one or both knees click, and the patient describes a catching sensation under the patella. In determining the causes of the knee pain, what additional history do you need? What categories can you use to differentiate knee pain? What are your specific differential diagnoses for knee pain? What physical examination will you perform? What anatomic structures are you assessing as part of the physical examination? What special maneuvers will you perform?
Discussion: Assessing Musculoskeletal Pain
Photo Credit: Getty Images/Fotosearch RF
The body is constantly sending signals about its health. One of the most easily recognized signals is pain. Musculoskeletal conditions comprise one of the leading causes of severe long-term pain in patients. The musculoskeletal system is an elaborate system of interconnected levers that provides the body with support and mobility. Because of the interconnectedness of the musculoskeletal system, identifying the causes of pain can be challenging. Accurately interpreting the cause of musculoskeletal pain requires an assessment process informed by patient history and physical exams.
In this Discussion, you will consider case studies that describe abnormal findings in patients seen in a clinical setting.
To prepare:
By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned to one of the following specific case studies for this Discussion. Please see the “Course Announcements” section of the classroom for your assignment from your Instructor.
• Your Discussion post should be in the Episodic/Focused SOAP Note format rather than the traditional narrative style Discussion posting format. Refer to Chapter 2 of the Sullivan text and the Episodic/Focused SOAP Template in the Week 5 Learning Resources for guidance. Remember that all Episodic/Focused SOAP notes have specific data included in every patient case.
• Review the following case studies:
Case 1: Back Pain
Photo Credit: University of Virginia. (n.d.). Lumbar Spine Anatomy [Photograph]. Retrieved from http://www.med-ed.virginia.edu/courses/rad/ext/5lumbar/01anatomy.html. Used with permission of University of Virginia.
A 42-year-old male reports pain in his lower back for the past month. The pain sometimes radiates to his left leg. In determining the cause of the back pain, based on your knowledge of anatomy, what nerve roots might be involved? How would you test for each of them? What other symptoms need to be explored? What are your differential diagnoses for acute low back pain? Consider the possible origins using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) guidelines as a framework. What physical examination will you perform? What special maneuvers will you perform?
Case 2: Ankle Pain
Photo Credit: University of Virginia. (n.d.). Lateral view of ankle showing Boehler’s angle [Photograph]. Retrieved from http://www.med-ed.virginia.edu/courses/rad/ext/8ankle/01anatomy.html. Used with permission of University of Virginia.
A 46-year-old female reports pain in both of her ankles, but she is more concerned about her right ankle. She was playing soccer over the weekend and heard a “pop.” She is able to bear weight, but it is uncomfortable. In determining the cause of the ankle pain, based on your knowledge of anatomy, what foot structures are likely involved? What other symptoms need to be explored? What are your differential diagnoses for ankle pain? What physical examination will you perform? What special maneuvers will you perform? Should you apply the Ottawa ankle rules to determine if you need additional testing?
With regard to the case study you were assigned:
• Review this week’s Learning Resources, and consider the insights they provide about the case study.
• Consider what history would be necessary to collect from the patient in the case study you were assigned.
• Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. How would the results be used to make a diagnosis?
• Identify at least five possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient.
Note: Before you submit your initial post, replace the subject line (“Discussion – Week 8”) with “Review of Case Study ___.” Fill in the blank with the number of the case study you were assigned.
By Day 3 of Week 8
Post an episodic/focused note about the patient in the case study to which you were assigned using the episodic/focused note template provided in the Week 5 resources. Provide evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for each case. List five different possible conditions for the patient’s differential diagnosis, and justify why you selected each.
Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link, and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit!
Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses.
By Day 6 of Week 8
Respond to at least two of your colleagues on 2 different days who were assigned different case studies than you. Analyze the possible conditions from your colleagues’ differential diagnoses. Determine which of the conditions you would reject and why. Identify the most likely condition, and justify your reasoning.
Submission and Grading Information
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:
Week 8 Discussion Rubric
Post by Day 3 of Week 8 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 8
To Participate in this Discussion:
Week 8 Discussion
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Content
Name: NURS_6512_Week_8_Discussion_Rubric
• Grid View
• List View
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Posting Points Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
“Answers all parts of the Discussion question(s) with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. Supported by at least three current, credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. Points Range: 40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
“Responds to the Discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
“Responds to some of the Discussion question(s). One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Post is cited with two credible sources. Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
“Does not respond to the Discussion question(s) adequately. Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Contains only one or no credible sources. Not written clearly or concisely. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.
Main Post: Timeliness Points Range: 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by Day 3. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
N/A Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
N/A Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post main post by Day 3.
First Response Points Range: 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
“Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of Learning Objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. Points Range: 15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
“Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. Points Range: 13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
“Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
“Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited.
Second Response Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
“Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of Learning Objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
“Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
“Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
“Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited.
Participation Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
N/A Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
N/A Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on three different days.
Sample Answer 2 for NURS 6512 Assessing Musculoskeletal Pain
Subjective
CC: Lower back pain
HPI: Hispanic male patient JM, age 42, presented to the clinic today complaining of severe lower back pain over the past month. Periodically, the pain travels along his left leg. He felt a sharp, throbbing pain in his left lower leg, along with a tingling feeling. He said the ache in his back was an eight out of ten. He feels more discomfort when he lifts heavy objects, bends, or sits for lengthy periods of time. He says over-the-counter ibuprofen helps a little.
Current Medications:
OTC Ibuprofen 400mg Q4hrs as needed for pain.
Claritin 10mg daily for allergies
Lisinopril 5mg daily for hypertension
Allergies: No known drug allergy; environmental allergies: Pollen (Reaction- sneezing and watery eyes).
PMHx: Medical history includes hypertension 5 years ago. No hospitalizations. His vaccinations are all current.
Past surgical Hx: No surgical history reported.
Social Hx: JM has a high school diploma and is employed as a bricklayer for a local construction company. He is married and resides in a three-bedroom home with his wife and 10-year-old son. For the last ten years, he has been smoking one pack of cigarettes per day. He denied consuming alcohol or using illegal substances. Because of his back pain, he refuses to exercise on a regular basis. He follows a healthy diet that includes fruits and vegetables.
Family Hx: Mother is 65 years old, living, and has been diagnosed with high blood pressure and high cholesterol. His father is 70 years old, living and suffering from hypertension and benign prostatic hyperplasia. Grandpa on the mother’s side passed away at age 64 due to heart attack complications. Maternal grandmother died at age 73 from asthma and diabetes related problems. His paternal grandfather passed away at age 71 due to COPD-related illnesses. His paternal grandmother was 55 years old when she passed away from lung cancer. At the age of 45, one sibling was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis. One healthy kid of 10 years old.
ROS:
General: Reported intermittent tingling and numbness in the left limb. No reports of fever, chills, or weight loss.
HEENT: Denies head injury, blurred vision, hearing loss. No changes in smell or taste reported. No complaints of epistaxis. No sore throat was reported.
Skin: No skin lesion, mole, or rash.
Cardiovascular: No reports of heart murmur, chest discomfort, and irregular heartbeat. No edema in the extremities.
Respiratory: No reports of cough or dyspnea.
Neurological: Denies migraines, fainting, or convulsions. No reports of coordination problems.
Musculoskeletal: Pain in the lower back and sometimes in the left leg. Denies that other parts of the body have swollen joints or muscle pain.
Hematologic/Lymphatic: Denies bleeding or bruising. Denies enlarged nodes or history of splenectomy.
Endocrine: No heat or cold intolerance reported. No c/o polydipsia or polyuria.
Objective
Physical Exam:
General: Patient is alert and oriented x3. He is calm and answers interview questions appropriately. He is well-nourished and well- developed. He reports weakness to the left lower extremity.
Vitals: BP- 145/88mmHg; HR- 90bpm and regular; Resp- 19bpm and regular; Temp- 98.5F orally; SPO2 99%R/A; Height- 5’8”; Weight- 166lbs; BMI- 25.2.
Skin: Turgor is good. No rashes or lesions.
HEENT: Head is normocephalic. PERRLA. Conjunctivae negative for exudate and hemorrhage. External auditory canal is patent. Ears are nontender and not swollen. Nares are patent. Nasal mucosa is pink without drainage. Oral mucosa is moist, pink with no lesions. No tonsillar swelling, no pharyngeal swelling.
Cardiovascular/peripheral Vascular: Presence of S1S2 heart sounds during auscultation; no murmurs. Heart rate regular rhythm. Peripheral pulses 2+ symmetrical bilaterally. No peripheral edema.
Respiratory: Chest symmetrical. No adventitious lung sound auscultated.
Gastrointestinal: Abdomen is symmetrical. Normoactive bowel sounds x four quadrants. Abdomen is soft, nontender. No palpable masses.
Musculoskeletal: Low back pain with flexion, extension, and twisting. Limited ROM to lower extremities. No sign of trauma to lower back.
Neurological: Alert and oriented x3. Appropriate affect and mood.
Diagnostic Test:
- Complete blood count (CBC) to verify infection (high WBC count).
- Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) to detect inflammation.
- A computed tomography (CT) scan to detect unusual tissues and analyze the patient’s spinal status.
- Imaging of the spinal cord and nerves using (MRI) magnetic resonance imaging (Dains et al., 2019).
Assessment
Differential Diagnosis:
- Lumber disc herniation (LDH): Lumbar disc herniation is defined as the movement of disc material (annulus fibrosis or nucleus pulposus) over the intervertebral disc area, causing low back and/or leg pain (Yang et al., 2022). It usually starts with lower back discomfort that spreads down one leg and is often followed by sensations of numbness or tingling in the lower leg. The symptoms of LDH correspond to the patient’s chief concern.
- Sciatica: Sciatica is characterized by radiating and tingling pain down the leg and lower back caused by inflammation or compression of the lumbosacral nerve roots (Jensen et al., 2019). Furthermore, sciatica is frequently brought on by a herniated spinal disk, excessive movement, or heavy lifting, according to Dains et al. (2019). The patient is overweight, and his job requires heavy lifting and recurrent movements, which may contribute to his lower back pain.
- Lumber Spinal Stenosis (LSS): Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a degenerative disc condition that causes the area encompassing the vertebrae’s neurovascular systems to narrow (Fishchenko et al., 2018). Symptoms of nerve inflammation or compression include discomfort and weakness or numbness in the legs. A history, physical examination, and imaging studies are used to make the diagnosis. The assessment should concentrate on leg or buttock pain while ambulating and stretching to alleviate symptoms (Chagnas et al., 2019).
- Piriformis Syndrome (PS): Muscle spasm in the piriformis and/or irritation of the sciatic nerve in the area are the root causes of piriformis syndrome, as stated by Siddiq & Rasker (2019). Physical examination, patient history, and imaging studies like x-rays are used to determine the diagnosis of PS. The authors indicated that the flexion-adduction-internal rotation test, the Pace sign, and the Freiberg techniques are used to identify individuals with PS. Pain and weakness by resisted abduction and external rotation of the hip while seated suggests signs of Pace. The Freiberg sign manifests as pain and weakness with passive forced internal rotation of the hip in a supine position.
- Lumbar spondylolisthesis: Low back pain, lower limb radiating pain, and sporadic neurogenic claudication are symptoms of lumbar spondylolisthesis, a degenerative condition of the lumbar spine (Wang et al., 2022). The patient’s symptoms match the above statement, too.
References
Chagnas, M.-O., Poiraudeau, S., Lef vre-Colau, M.-M., Rannou, F., & Nguyen, C. (2019).
Diagnosis and management of lumbar spinal stenosis in primary care in france: A survey
of general practitioners. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 20(1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2782-y
Dains, J.E., Baumann, L.C., & Scheibel, P. (2019). Advanced health assessment and clinical diagnosis in primary care (6th ed.). St.
Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.
Fishchenko, I. V., Kravchuk, L. D., & Perepechay, O. A. (2018). Lumbar spinal stenosis: symptoms, diagnosis and treatment (meta-
analysis of literature data). Pain Medicine, 3(1), 18–32. https:// doi -org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.31636/pmjua.v3i1.83
Jensen, R.K., Kongstead, A., Kjaer, P., & Koes, B. (2019). Diagnosis and treatment of sciatica. BMJ. 16273.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.16273
Siddiq, M. B., & Rasker, J.J (2019). Piriformis pyomyositis, a cause of piriformis syndrome-a systematic search and review. Clinical
Rheumatology, 38(7), 1811-1821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-019-04552-y
Wang, P., Zhang, J., Liu, T., Yang, J., & Hao, D. (2022). Comparison of degenerative lumbar
spondylolisthesis and isthmic lumbar spondylolisthesis: Effect of pedicle screw
placement on proximal facet invasion in surgical treatment. BMC Musculoskeletal
Disorders, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04962-7
Yang, S., Shao, Y., Yan, Q., Wu, C., Yang, H., & Zou, J. (2021). Differential diagnosis strategy
between lower extremity arterial occlusive disease and lumbar disc herniation. BioMed
Research International, 2021, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6653579
Sample Answer 3 for NURS 6512 Assessing Musculoskeletal Pain
I thought your analysis of this case study was on point.
Analysis of Differential Diagnoses:
Right Ankle Sprain: The most likely diagnosis is this. Sprains of the ankle involve the ligaments being stretched or torn. The patient suffered this type of injury during soccer due to sudden force to the ankle. Physical examination also reveals swelling, tenderness, and decreased range of motion in the right ankle. Another point worth noting when formulating the differential diagnosis between an ankle sprain and an inflammatory or infectious process is that an ankle sprain usually does not cause systemic symptoms, for example, a fever.
Anterior Talofibular Ligament Rupture: This is a specific type of ankle sprain in which the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL), a critical ligament on the outside of the ankle, is torn. A ligament rupture would be consistent with the patient’s audible “pop” description. This diagnosis is also supported by swelling and tenderness over the lateral malleolus.
An ATFL rupture may explain the patient’s severe symptoms. Avulsion Fracture of the Lateral Malleolus: This is a less likely diagnosis, but the mechanism of injury and the patient’s symptoms do not rule it out. An avulsion fracture occurs when the forceful pull of a tendon or ligament tears away a fragment of bone. Given the sudden inversion force to the patient’s ankle and her report of an audible “pop,” it is possible that an avulsion fracture could have occurred. Physical examination findings of tenderness and swelling over the lateral malleolus also consider this. An x-ray would be needed to diagnose or rule out this condition definitively.
All of the patient’s physical exam, injury, and symptoms seem reasonable. A diagnostic imaging test would be the next step. An ankle X-ray is a valuable tool that provides clarity.
Based on the patient’s history of injury during a soccer game, the sudden onset of pain, the description of an audible “pop,” and the physical examination findings, the most likely diagnosis is a right ankle sprain. Ankle sprains are common in athletes and individuals who engage in sports activities, as in this patient’s case. The specific involvement of the Anterior Talofibular Ligament (ATFL) should be a particular consideration, given the physical exam findings.
While all three conditions on the differential list could produce the patient’s symptoms, a right ankle sprain (possibly involving the ATFL) is the most likely, given the mechanism of injury, the absence of other significant findings on the review of systems, and the physical examination findings. An avulsion fracture is a potential concern, but an ankle x-ray would confirm or refute this diagnosis. If the x-ray does not show a fracture and the patient’s symptoms persist or worsen, more advanced imaging, for example, a CT scan or MRI, may be needed to evaluate for ligament damage, especially if there is suspicion of a rupture of the ATFL.
References
The 2023 Osteoarthritis Clinical Trial and Research Guide. Policy Lab. (2023, October 17). https://policylab.us/clinical-trials/osteoarthritis/
McKechnie, D. D. (2023, July 19). Osteoarthritis: Causes, symptoms, and treatment. Patient.info. https://patient.info/bones-joints-muscles/arthritis/osteoarthritis
Sample Answer 4 for NURS 6512 Assessing Musculoskeletal Pain
Review of Case Study 2
Focused SOAP Note for a patient with ankle pain
Patient Information:
S.J. is a 46-year-old African American female.
Subjective
CC (chief complaint): “My ankles hurt, but it is much worse on the right side.”
HPI: S.J. is a 46-year-old African American female who presents to the clinic with bilateral ankle pain for the past 3 days. The pain started after she played soccer over the weekend and noticed a pop sound while playing. The pain feels like it is throbbing and achy. She can bear weight on both ankles but noticed worse discomfort on the right side. Her pain is 3/10 in the left ankle but 6/10 on the right side. Elevation and ice have provided relief, but her right ankle has become swollen. Her pain is 6/10 on her right ankle and 3/10 on the left side.
Current Medications: Metformin 500 mg PO BID, Multivitamin PO daily, Ibuprofen 400 mg PO every 6hrs PRN, Tylenol 500 mg PO every 6 hrs. PRN, Oral contraceptive I tablet PO daily.
Past Medical History: Diabetes mellitus type 2.
Family History: Mother has type 2 diabetes mellitus (controlled) and hypertension. Father has arthritis. Maternal grandmother has type 2 diabetes. Maternal grandfather had hypertension and died due to a stroke at 62. The paternal grandmother was diagnosed with recurrent UTI. My paternal grandfather has arthritis. My Sister and brother both have type 2 diabetes mellitus. Two children are healthy with no medical history.
Social History: S.J has a husband of 20 years and two children, a 15-year-old son and 13-year-old daughter. The family lives together in their private home and family support. Employed full-time as an accountant. She exercises five days a week and denies any alcohol, tobacco, or illicit drug use. Uses a seat belt while driving and not use of cell phone while driving.
Allergies: Hydromorphone (Dilaudid), Nausea, and vomiting .
Immunization: Influenza vaccine October 2022. Tetanus June 2020. Covid19 vaccine X2 doses of Pfizer in March of 2022
Review of Systems
HEENT
Head: Head is symmetrical and normal in size.
Eyes: Denies light sensitivity, cloudy vision, drainage, double vision, or blurry vision.
Ears: No discharge from ears, tinnitus, swelling, or impaired hearing.
Nose: denies nasal congestion, drainage, packing, postnasal drip, or nosebleed.
Neck: no tenderness, swelling, and no pain, or injury.
Throat: Denies pain while swallowing, cough, or enlarged tonsils.
Cardiovascular: No edema, difficulty breathing, palpitations, orthopnea, murmur, gallop, or Arrhythmias.
Neurological: Alert and oriented, denies any dizziness, headaches, seizures, or problems with coordination, numbness and tingling in all extremities.
Musculoskeletal: Bilateral ankle pain that is more severe on the right ankle. Limited range of
Lymphatics: No cervical lymphadenopathy, no Hx of splenectomy, or enlarged nodes motion on both lower extremities, mainly on the right. Swollen right foot.
Objective
Physical Exam:
Vital Signs: Temp 97.8 oral, P 72, BP 135/78, R 16 unlabored, Wt.: 168 lbs., Ht: 5’9″. BMI 25.
General: Alert and Oriented x4. Complaints of pain. She is Pleasant, calm, and cooperative. Dressed appropriately and well-groomed and well developed. Appears her age.
HEENT:
Head: No trauma or headache.
Eyes: No edema, drainage, or crust. Pink conjunctiva and white sclera.
Ears: No hearing aids, negative for ecchymosis, laceration, external trauma, drainage, swelling or pain.
Nose: No nasal drainage, congestion, or postnasal drip.
Neck: Symmetrical, no tracheal deviation, tenderness, mass, or rigidity. Oronasal pharynx clear.
Heart/Peripheral Vascular: S1 & S2 noted. No murmurs. My right ankle with ecchymosis and edema. Left ankle no edema. Bilateral posterior tibial pulses. No thrill 2+. Bilateral dorsalis pedis pulses no thrill 2+. Capillary refill in hands and feet in less than 3 seconds.
Musculoskeletal: Right ankle edema with 2x2cm ecchymosis on mid-lateral malleolus area with tenderness with palpitation on the lateral side. Range of motion with pain in bilateral ankles and limitations with dorsiflexion, plantar flexion, and inversion. Positive pain on rotation of ankles bilaterally with worsening pain on the right. No bony tenderness, deformity, or crepitus.
Neurological: Alert and oriented x4. Negative for headache, dizziness, and seizures. Strength and sensation are intact bilaterally in the upper and lower extremities, with some weakness noted at the right ankle.
Skin/Lymph Nodes: Skin is dry, warm, and intact. The right ankle has ecchymosis on the lateral malleolus area.
Diagnostic results: X-rays and MRI are to determine an early diagnosis and treatments and prevent chronic pain. These tests should be performed on the areas, including 6 cm of the posterior and tip of the lateral and mid malleolus. The Ottawa Ankle rules would be observed to identify the necessity for diagnostic testing in the patient suffering from ankle pain. This tool helps identify an ankle fracture with a 98.5% sensitivity level.
Assessment
Primary or presumptive diagnosis: Ankle Pain
Differential Diagnoses
Ankle Fracture: An ankle fracture would produce swelling around the injured bone with possible bone deformity and difficulty bearing weight. Patients with ankle fractures often hear a crack or pop noise when an injury occurs. S.J, exhibits these symptoms, but there is no bony deformity noted on physical examination (Dains et al., 2019)
Achilles Tendinitis: Achilles tendinopathy is a soft tissue disorder that causes pain, swelling, and stiffness. Achilles tendonitis is caused by physical activity that involves running and jumping. S.J, displays the symptoms of pain and swelling but did not describe her ankle as being stiff (Mendes & Palmer, 2016).
Anterior ankle Impingement: This is a chronic condition of the bony anterior ankle. This disorder is frequently seen in people involved in sports. It is linked with individuals with recurrent ankle trauma or injury. An affected person will exhibit tenderness, lateral peroneus tertius, and pain with dorsiflexion. There is a possibility that S.J, is experiencing this issue (Tausen et al., 2014).
Ankle Sprain: this happens because of an inversion force to the foot, leading to stress in the ankle by stretching and tearing the anterior talofibular ligament or calcaneofibular ligament. Sprains cause minimal to moderate pain, increasing 1 to 2 days after the trauma. When the sprains involve injury to ligamentous structures inflammatory process begins. The symptoms of ankle sprain include swelling, pain, joint stiffness, limited range of motion, and ecchymosis after a few days. Treatment for ankle sprain would involve periods of rest and ice compression. The diagnosis of an Ankle Sprain is very likely since all the symptoms are exhibited (Miklovic et al., 2018).
References
Dains, J. E., Baumann, L. C., & Scheibel, P. (2019). Advanced health assessment and clinical diagnosis in primary care (6th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby. Credit Line: Advanced Health Assessment and Clinical Diagnosis in Primary Care, 6th Edition by Dains,J.E., Baumann, L. C., & Scheibel, P. Copyright 2019 by Mosby. Reprinted by permission of Mosby via the Copyright Clearance Center.
Mendes, A., & Palmer, S. (2016). A look at assessing achilles tendinopathy in the community. British Journal of Community Nursing, 21(6), 315-316. Retrieved from https://doiorg.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.12968/bjcn.2016.21.6.315
Links to an external site. Links to an external site.
Miklovic, T. M., Donovan, L., Protzuk, O. A., Kang, M. S., & Feger, M. A. (2018). Acute lateral ankle sprain to chronic ankle instability: a pathway of dysfunction. The Physician and sports medicine, 46(1), 116-122.https://doi-org/10.1080/00913847.2018.1409604.
Tausen, P., Toy, J., Perez, J. L., Milewski, M. D., & Reach, Jr, J. S. (2014). Anterior ankle impingement: Diagnosis and treatment. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 22(5), 333. Retrieved from https://doiorg.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.5435/JAAOS-22-05-333.
Sample Answer 5 for NURS 6512 Assessing Musculoskeletal Pain
Patient Information:
Initials, Age, Sex, Race: a 46-year-old female patient.
S.
CC (chief complaint): ‘My ankles are painful.’
HPI: The patient is a 46-year-old female that came to the department with complaints of pain in both ankles. She reports being more concerned with the right ankle. The patient notes that she was playing soccer over the weekend when she heard a ‘pop.’ She can bear weight but is uncomfortable. The patient rates her pain as 7/10, with increased intensity with weight. The patient denied any radiating pain. Rest and ibuprofen relieve the pain. She also uses cold compressions to sooth the pain.
Current Medications: The patient currently uses ibuprofen 500 mg as needed for pain.
Allergies: The patient has latex allergy. She denied any allergic reaction to drugs and environmental allergens.
PMHx: The patient’s immunization history is up-to-date. Her last tetanus immunization was 12/10/2022. She has a history of hospitalization due to pneumonia. She has no history of surgery or blood transfusion.
Soc Hx: The patient is a teacher. She is married with two children. She resides in an owned property with her family. She engages in sports activities weekly. She does not smoke or takes alcohol. She does not have any history of drug and substance use. She reports wearing a helmet and seat belts when riding and driving. Her support system includes family, friends, and church members. She is a devoted Christian.
Fam Hx: Her diseased mother died of hypertension. She was also diabetic and diagnosed at some point with anxiety disorder. Her living father has colon cancer. Her sister was diagnosed with asthma a year ago. Her paternal grandfather died of heart disease.
ROS:
GENERAL: The patient is dressed appropriately for the occasion. She is alert and oriented to self-, others, time, and place. She denies weight loss, fever, chills, weakness or fatigue.
HEENT: Eyes: The patient denies visual loss, blurred vision, double vision or yellow sclerae. Ears, Nose, Throat: The patient denies hearing loss, sneezing, congestion, runny nose or sore throat.
SKIN: The patient denies rash or itching.
CARDIOVASCULAR: The patient denies chest pain, chest pressure or chest discomfort. No palpitations or edema.
RESPIRATORY: The patient denies shortness of breath, cough or sputum.
GASTROINTESTINAL: The patient denies anorexia, nausea, vomiting or diarrhea. No abdominal pain or blood.
GENITOURINARY: The patient denies burning on urination, urgency and frequency. She is menopausal.
NEUROLOGICAL: The patient denies headache, dizziness, syncope, paralysis, ataxia, numbness or tingling in the extremities. She also denies change in bowel or bladder control.
MUSCULOSKELETAL: The patient reports bilateral ankle joints. The right ankle hurts the most. She reports some tenderness on the anterior aspect in the right ankle. She is weight bearing but uncomfortable.
HEMATOLOGIC: The patient denies anemia, bleeding or bruising.
LYMPHATICS: The patient denies enlarged nodes. There is no history of splenectomy.
PSYCHIATRIC: The patient denies history of depression or anxiety.
ENDOCRINOLOGIC: The patient denies reports of sweating, cold or heat intolerance. No polyuria or polydipsia.
ALLERGIES: The patient reports latex allergy. She denies food, drug, or environmental allergic reaction.
O.
Physical exam:
Vitals: Temperature: 37.6, BP 122/80, P-100, RR 22 bpm, SPO2 98%
General: The patient is well-groomed for the occasion. She is alert and oriented. She is responsive to questions and maintains normal eye contact. There is no evidence of any distress, fatigue, or weight loss.
Chest/Lungs: The chest rises symmetrically with respirations. The patient does not demonstrate nasal flaring or discharge. The nares are patent. On auscultation there are wheezes, rales, crackles, or rhonchi. The lungs are clear in all the lobes.
Heart/Peripheral Vascular: The patient does not have central or peripheral cyanosis. S1 and S2 heart sounds heard. There are no murmurs or S3 heart sounds. The peripheral pulses are adequate with capillary refill of less than 3 seconds. The extremities are warm to touch with no ulcers.
Musculoskeletal: The patient reports bilateral ankle pain. On assessment there is limited range of motion with plantar flexion, inversion and dorsiflexion. The right ankle appears edematous to the anterior aspect. There is skin discoloration over the right ankle. There is no cyanosis or tissue ischemia or bruising. There are no deformities. The patient is weight bearing with some discomfort. On palpation, the skin is warm to touch. The lateral malleolus area is tender to touch. The anterior talofibular ligament is inflamed.
Lymphatics: There is no lymphadenopathy or weight gain or loss.
Psychiatric: The patient denies any history of mental health disorders.
Diagnostic results:
One of the diagnostic investigations needed to develop an accurate diagnosis for the client is x-ray. An x-ray of the right ankle would be important to visualize the ligaments, joint, and bones. The results will determine if the problem is due to soft tissue injury, fracture, or ligament tear. The other recommended diagnostic is magnetic resonance imaging. MRI will provide detailed cross-sectional images of soft tissue involvement. A CT scan of the ankle joint may also be needed to guide in the diagnosis (Chen et al., 2019). Ultrasound may be needed to determine the functioning of the tendon or ligaments in different foot movements.
A.
Differential Diagnoses
Ankle sprain is the primary diagnosis for the patient. An ankle sprain develops when a joint is suddenly subjected to a move that strains the ligaments and tendons. It is most common in individuals that engage in activities such as sports. Patients that suffer ankle sprains often complain of symptoms that align with those seen in the patient in this case study. They include pain on weight bearing, swelling, tenderness, bruising, reduced range of motion, and popping sound during the injury (Chen et al., 2019; Delahunt & Remus, 2019).
Ankle fracture is the secondary diagnosis that should be considered for this patient. An ankle fracture develops when a bone is broken from fall, twit, or trauma. The fractures vary based on the severity of the cause. Patients that suffer ankle fractures experience symptoms that include deformity, tenderness, swelling, throbbing pain, bruising, and difficulty walking (Scheer et al., 2020). The patient in the case study is least likely to be suffering from fractured ankle since there are no evident deformities in the ankles.
The other diagnosis to be considered for the patient is tendon rupture. A rupture of the Achilles tendon may occur in cases of extreme stress and pressure to the ankle joint and tendon. The affected patients often experience symptoms such as thickened Achilles tendon, pain near the heel, pain that worsens with activity, and difficulties in flexing the affected leg. The additional symptoms include a pop sound during the time of injury and patient being unable to stand on the toes of the affected extremity (Svensson et al., 2019; Tarantino et al., 2020). Additional diagnostics will help in differentiating between ankle sprain and ruptured Achilles tendon.
This section is not required for the assignments in this course (NURS 6512) but will be required for future courses.
References
Chen, E. T., McInnis, K. C., & Borg-Stein, J. (2019). Ankle Sprains: Evaluation, Rehabilitation, and Prevention. Current Sports Medicine Reports, 18(6), 217. https://doi.org/10.1249/JSR.0000000000000603
Delahunt, E., & Remus, A. (2019). Risk Factors for Lateral Ankle Sprains and Chronic Ankle Instability. Journal of Athletic Training, 54(6), 611–616. https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-44-18
Scheer, R. C., Newman, J. M., Zhou, J. J., Oommen, A. J., Naziri, Q., Shah, N. V., Pascal, S. C., Penny, G. S., McKean, J. M., Tsai, J., & Uribe, J. A. (2020). Ankle Fracture Epidemiology in the United States: Patient-Related Trends and Mechanisms of Injury. The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, 59(3), 479–483. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2019.09.016
Svensson, R. B., Couppé, C., Agergaard, A.-S., Ohrhammar Josefsen, C., Jensen, M. H., Barfod, K. W., Nybing, J. D., Hansen, P., Krogsgaard, M., & Magnusson, S. P. (2019). Persistent functional loss following ruptured Achilles tendon is associated with reduced gastrocnemius muscle fascicle length, elongated gastrocnemius and soleus tendon, and reduced muscle cross-sectional area. TRANSLATIONAL SPORTS MEDICINE, 2(6), 316–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/tsm2.103
Tarantino, D., Palermi, S., Sirico, F., & Corrado, B. (2020). Achilles Tendon Rupture: Mechanisms of Injury, Principles of Rehabilitation and Return to Play. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology, 5(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk5040095
Name: NURS_6512_Week_8_Discussion_Rubric
Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Main Posting |
Points Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
“Answers all parts of the Discussion question(s) with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. Supported by at least three current, credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.
|
Points Range: 40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
“Responds to the Discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.
|
Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
“Responds to some of the Discussion question(s). One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Post is cited with two credible sources. Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors.
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
“Does not respond to the Discussion question(s) adequately. Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Contains only one or no credible sources. Not written clearly or concisely. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.
|
Main Post: Timeliness |
Points Range: 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by Day 3.
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
N/A
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
N/A
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post main post by Day 3.
|
First Response |
Points Range: 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
“Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of Learning Objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
|
Points Range: 15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
“Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
|
Points Range: 13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
“Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
“Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited.
|
Second Response |
Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
“Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of Learning Objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
|
Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
“Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
|
Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
“Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
“Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited.
|
Participation |
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
N/A
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
N/A
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on three different days.
|
Total Points: 100 |
---|