NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership
Chamberlain University NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership– Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Chamberlain University NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Chamberlain University NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership
The introduction for the Chamberlain University NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership
Effective Coalition Leadership
Locate a state or national coalition advocating for your approved healthcare policy concern. Who are the coalition partners and is there an identified leader? Can you identify successes indicating strong leadership? What can you add to the content for your upcoming interview from the work of this coalition?
A coalition is a group of people who share a common goal and work together to influence change (Green, & Edmonson, 2013). Coalitions can formulate decisions only if they are able to look at the overall picture and determine how the decision will affect different people and various organizations (Green, & Edmonson, 2013). Strong leadership is essential for a coalition to be successful (Green, & Edmonson, 2013). This element is necessary so that the group will have direction and be able to accomplish goals that it sets (Green, & Edmonson, 2013). The leader must be able to foresee a clear vision of what the group is trying to achieve (Mennella, & Balderrama, 2017). Leaders must possess the ability to actively listen to every party involved in the decision-making process in order to learn different viewpoints, and then they have to be able to think long term as to how their decision affects both the members of their group as well as outside organizations (Mennella, & Balderrama, 2017). Effective leaders of a coalition will need to mediate between different groups involved in the shared goal; they might be called to evaluate opposing sides of an issue after ensuring all members feel that they have had an equal input in the decisions (Green, & Edmonson, 2013). An accomplished leader can interact with representatives from different agencies spanning from healthcare organizations to government officials (Green, & Edmonson, 2013). Like any leader in any organization, the leader in a coalition needs to be fair and willing to listen to the other members’ opinions (Mennella, & Balderrama, 2017).
By being master prepared nurses, we will be the ones implementing change in the healthcare system. Nurses comprise over three million members in the current healthcare population (Green, & Edmonson, 2013). We are in a position to be able to join together and accomplish real change that can affect patients’ lives (Green, & Edmonson, 2013). The nursing profession has laid a foundation for being an advocate for patients while also fighting for policies and procedures that need to change (Green, & Edmonson, 2013). Falling into coalition membership seems natural for nurses. We are going to be viewed as leaders and decision makers. With this responsibility, we must be educated in the current issues and be willing to put in the time and effort to improve our current healthcare system. Along with these responsibilities we will be granted positions of power. Ultimately, we must be willing to tackle these issues and assume these roles to benefit our profession and our patients.
References
Green, A., & Edmonson, C. (2013). An Opportunity to Lead: State Coalitions. Nurse Leader, 1128,39-31,39. doi:10.1016/j.mnl.2012.11.00
Mennella, H. A., & Balderrama, D. M. (2017). Leadership: Facilitating Change. CINAHL Nursing Guide,
ALSO READ:
NR 506 Week 4 Discussion Challenges in Lobbying Strategies
NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 4 Discussion Challenges in Lobbying Strategies
NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 4 Assignment
NR 506 Week 5 Discussion Drivers of High Performance Healthcare Systems
NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 5 Discussion Drivers of High Performance Healthcare Systems
NR 506 Week 6 Discussion Using the Media
NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 6 Discussion Using the Media
NR 506 Week 7: RN as Healthcare Policy Leader Discussion 2018
NR 506 Week 7 Discussion RN as Healthcare Policy Leader
NR 506- Healthcare Policy Week 7 Discussion RN as Healthcare Policy Leader
NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 7 Discussion RN as Healthcare Policy Leader
NR 506 Week 8 Discussion Reflection: Global Policy Reform
NR 506- Healthcare Policy Week 8 Discussion Reflection Global Policy Reform
NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 8 Discussion Reflection Global Policy Reform
Coalitions have a distinct advantage of strength in numbers as no one person can get as much done on their own as they can with a group of others that share the same beliefs and goals. Together, a coalition adds credibility, fosters networking and media attention while increasing access to policy makers. Since public opinion is what drives government, the broad support that a coalition offers is an effective mechanism for change (National Council on Disability, n.d.). It is essential for a coalition to have a strong leader so that productivity is maximized and conflict is minimized (CCN, 2018).
Ineffective leadership is one of the many downfalls of an effective coalition (CCN, 2018). Some of the characteristics of a great coalition leader are: the ability to speak for others, credibility, intuition and the ability to have a grasp of timing.
Coalition leaders must be able to speak for the crowd in a professional and succinct manner. They must be able to take the complex ideas of the masses and present them in a way that makes the audience understand where they are coming from. Coalition leaders must be able to speak to crowds, both big and small while giving everyone a say in the matter at hand while also keeping to the agenda.
Coalition leaders must exhibit credibility. The people that they represent and the people that they are speaking to must be able to trust them so they have to be honest, reliable and true to their word. A leader must be able to stand before a crowd and give off a sense of accountability and trust.
Intuition is another strong point of an effective coalition leader (or any type of leader, for that matter). As we progress through our careers we acquire skills that allow us to make decisions based on past experiences. A nursing coalition leader should have clinical experience that they can apply to their leadership role. For example, a mechanical engineer would not make an effective nursing coalition leader.
Chamberlain College of Nursing. (2018). Week 3: Effective Coalition Leadership [online lesson]. NR506: Health Care Policy. Retrieved from: https://chamberlain.instructure.com/courses/22798/pages/week-3-lesson?module_item_id=2729972
National Council on Disability. (n.d.). Applied leadership for effective coalitions. Retrieved from: https://ncd.gov/publications/2001/Feb142001#3Links to an external site.
By definition, a coalition is just a group of two or more people that work together, or collaborate, in order to achieve a common goal. Other terms that mean the same are union, partnership, merger and alliance, to name a few (merriam-webster, n.d.). Coalitions apply to both my professional and my personal life in countless ways. In researching a response to your question, I found a few coalitions that I could use to prove my point.
1.) Locally, Sonoma County has a Healthcare Coalition which is related to disaster preparedness. They work together to formulate plans for disaster response for both the public and the different levels of healthcare facilities in the county. They state that they have a collaborative work group made up of health and medical providers. This benefits both my life and work because a disaster, as we witnessed with our recent wildfire, create a surge of patients and casualties that can overwhelm the healthcare system. A disaster can also displace community members and it is important to know how to respond during a disaster and to be prepared beforehand (SCDHS, 2018).
2.) Another local coalition is the Redwood Community Health Coalition. This consists of a team of healthcare professionals and 17 community health centers in 4 counties. Their goal is to improve access to and quality of care for the under-served members of our communities (RCHC, n.d.).
3.) The nurses union that I am a member of (it is required here at my facility), the California Nurses Association (CNA)/National Nurses Organizing Committee (NNOC)/AFL-CIO consists of over 86,000 members and covers all 50 states. CNA pushed for and achieved the mandated nurse:patient ratios in CA and other states, premium pay for nurses in CA, whistleblower protection for anyone who reports unsafe hospital conditions, and increased nursing education funding. Not only do they fight for nursing causes, but they also advocate for patient safety. For example, in CA (not sure about nationwide) we must provide every patient with contact information for those agencies responsible for responding to health care abuse. For nursing homes, it’s the Ombudsman, for hospitals, it’s The Joint Commission and the California Department of Public Health (National Nurses United, 2016).
Coalition. (n.d.) Retrieved from: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/coalitionLinks to an external site.
National Nurses United. (2016). Nurses building power. Retrieved from: https://www.nationalnursesunited.org/about-cnaLinks to an external site.
Redwood Community Health Coalitions (RCHC). (n.d.). Retrieved from: https://www.rchc.net/about-us/Links to an external site.
Sonoma County Department of Health Services (SCDHS). (2018). Healthcare Coalition. Retrieved from: http://www.sonoma-county.org/health/services/healthcarecoalition.asp
Participation for MSN
The Threaded Discussion Grading Grid and Rubric document can be found in Course Resources.
Participation Guidelines
Due Date: First initial posting to the required threaded discussion topic is due by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT. Peer and instructor responses are due by Sunday 11:59 pm MT. All posts for week 8 are due by the close of class on Wednesday 11:59 pm MT. Please note that the late assignment policy does not apply to the threaded discussions.
Total Points Possible: Varies with course, please see specific course syllabus. These guidelines are for a required threaded discussion worth 50 points. Please note that week 8 will be worth only 25 points.
Requirements:
Description of the Assignment
1. Initial posting: This is defined to be the initial post in which the student responds to the required threaded discussion topic. The first posting by a student within the required discussion area is considered to be the initial posting and will be evaluated using the rubric criteria. Scholarship in communication is expected. Required scholarly source(s) provide specific information that thoroughly address the required topic. For the initial posting, one scholarly source must be presented. The scholarly source must be an outside source. The student may use the required course textbook (s), assigned readings and lesson information in the initial post; however, these are not considered outside scholarly sources.
The initial posting must occur before Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT. Initial postings must be at a minimum of 300 words. References do not apply toward word count. ONLY in Week 8, the initial posting must be a minimum of 200 words with a scholarly reference. It remains due by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT
2. Peer responses: As part of the threaded discussion requirements, the student must provide a substantive response to a peer. Substantive responses pose new ideas, ask questions, and/or generally add to the discussion topic in a meaningful and constructive way.
The peer response must occur on a separate day from the initial posting and instructor response (see below). This peer response must occur before Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. This response does not require a scholarly reference unless information is paraphrased and/or direct quotes are used, then APA guidelines apply. Peer responses must be a minimum of 150 words. References do not apply toward word count.
3. Instructor response: The student must respond to an instructor’s follow-up questions. The instructor’s question may be directed to the student or may be a question directed to another student in the section. The response must be comprehensive and scholarly in nature. Instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words. References do not apply toward word count.
The response to the instructor must occur on a day different from the initial post and a day different from the peer response. Responses to the instructor must occur before Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.
4. For week 8 only: Students are expected to post a peer response or an instructor post but are not required to do both. These posts must be a minimum of 100 words. References do not apply toward word count. The peer or instructor response must be on a different day than the initial post and must occur before Wednesday, 11:50 pm MT due to the shorter week.
Posting Requirements:
- The initial posting must be provided before Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.
- The initial posting must have at least one scholarly outside source that is cited within the posting and referenced. Required course textbooks, assigned readings and lesson information are not considered to be outside scholarly sources.
- Initial posting must be a minimum of 300 words; peer responses and instructor responses a minimum 150 words.
- The peer responses and instructor responses must be provided before Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.
- All postings are substantive and relate to the graded threaded discussion topic.
- Only one small quote (15 words or less) within the entire initial posting is accepted.
- Postings must occur on 3 separate days.
- For week 8 only: the required postings are amended due to the shorter week. Two posts are required. One initial post and either a peer response or an instructor response. Initial post must be a minimum of 200 words and the peer or instructor response must be a minimum of 100 words. Both posts are required to be on two separate days. All posts must be made by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT
Criteria for Content
- Scholarliness: In this category, the student will conduct a search of the current databases and locate valid, relevant, and reliable information for the required topic. Each reference must be scholarly.
- Application of Course Knowledge: In this category, the student demonstrates the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge, and information learned in the course lesson and outside readings. This information is then applied to a real-life professional situation as an example.
- Interactive Dialogue: In this category, the minimum requirements are to provide an initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT of each week. In addition, one peer response and one instructor response are required. These postings must be completed by Sunday, 11:59 pm MT of each week. The initial posting, peer response, and instructor response must be on 3 separate days.
- Grammar, Syntax, APA: Proper grammar, APA, and syntax is required for all posts. Students should follow the APA Manual 6th Edition. Additional APA information is available in Course Resources.
NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership - Participation Requirement: One initial posting, one peer response and one instructor response (for a total of 3 posts for the week) are required on 3 separate days.
- Participation Deadline: The student must provide a substantive response to the graded threaded discussion topic. This must be posted by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT of each week. Peer and instructor responses must be posted by Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.
- For week 8 only: the required postings are amended due to the shorter week. Two posts are required. One initial post and either a peer response or an instructor response. Initial post must be a minimum of 200 words and the peer or instructor response must be a minimum of 100 words. Both posts are required to be on two separate days. All posts must be made by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.
-
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership
Criteria for Format and Special Instructions
- Instructor reserves the right to submit any threaded discussion posting to TurnItIn in order to verify the originality.
- When journals are used as the outside source of information, it is preferred that the journal be peer reviewed. The Chamberlain online librarian is very helpful in assisting you to find an article related to your topic. If you have questions concerning scholarly sources, please refer to the handout entitled “What is a scholarly source” located under “Course Resources” tab.
- Web sites vary in quality and scholarship. It is the responsibility of the student to determine the scholarly nature of the web site. If the instructor determines that the site failed to demonstrate scholarship, points maybe deducted. Students are cautioned to use care regarding .com sites. Some .com sites are excellent such as American Heart Association, but others are built by individuals and scholarliness is lacking. It is recommended that you check with your instructor before using a .com website as a reference.
- Only one small quote (15 words or less) within the entire initial posting is acceptable. It is expected that the student will paraphrase the information when presenting information from a scholarly source. The scholarly source(s) for the paraphrased information must be cited using APA format. Do not include a number of small quotes even if they are just a few words as your instructor considers a quote to be a quote no matter its limited size.
- Also Read: NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 2 Discussion Policy-Priority Selection
Grading Rubric
| Performance Category | 100% or highest level of performance
100% 16 points |
Very good or high level of performance
88% 14 points |
Acceptable level of performance
81% 13 points |
Inadequate demonstration of expectations
68% 11 points |
Deficient level of performance
56% 9 points |
Failing level
of performance 55% or less 0 points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Points Possible= 50 | 16 Points | 14 Points | 13 Points | 11 Points | 9 Points | 0 Points |
| Scholarliness
Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics. |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements
|
| 16 Points | 14 Points | 13 Points | 11 Points | 9 Points | 0 Points |
|
| Application of Course Knowledge
Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements
|
| 10 Points | 9 Points | 6 Points | 0 Points | |||
| Interactive Dialogue
Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count) The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count) Responses are substantive and relate to the topic. |
Demonstrated all of the following:
|
Demonstrated 3 of the following:
|
Demonstrated 2 of the following:
|
Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:
|
||
|
8 Points |
7 Points |
6 Points |
5 Points | 4 Points |
0 Points |
|
| Grammar, Syntax, APA
Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error. |
The following was present:
AND
AND
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
| 0 Points Deducted | 5 Points Lost | |||||
| Participation
Requirements |
Demonstrated the following:
|
Failed to demonstrate the following:
|
||||
| 0 Points Lost | 5 Points Lost | |||||
| Due Date Requirements | Demonstrated all of the following:
A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. |
Demonstrates one or less of the following.
A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. |
||||
Grading Rubric Guidelines Week 8 ONLY |
||||||
| Performance Category |
100% or highest level of performance 100% |
Very good or high level of performance
88% |
Acceptable level of performance 81% |
Inadequate demonstration of expectations
68% |
Deficient level of performance
56% |
Failing level of performance
55% or less |
| 8 Points | 7 Points |
6 Points |
5 Points | 4 Points | 0 Points | |
| Scholarliness
Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics. |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements
|
| 8 Points | 7 Points | 6 Points | 5 Points | 4 Points | 0 Points | |
| Application of Course Knowledge –
Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic. |
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements
Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic. |
| Interactive Dialogue
For Week 8 only: Initial post should be a minimum of 200 words (references do not count toward word count) The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 100 words each (references do not count toward word count) Responses are substantive and relate to the topic. |
Demonstrated all of the following:
|
Demonstrated 3 of the following:
|
Demonstrated 2 of the following:
|
Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:
|
||
| 4 Points | 3 Points |
2 Points | 0 Points | |||
| Grammar, Syntax, APA
Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error. |
The following was present:
AND
AND
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
||
| 0 Points | 5 Points Lost | |||||
| Participation Requirements | For Week 8 ONLY:
Demonstrated the following:
|
Failed to demonstrate the following:
|
||||
| 0 Points Lost | 5 Points Lost | |||||
| Requirements | For Week 8 ONLY:
Demonstrated all of the following:
A minimum of one peer or one instructor response is to be posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT |
Demonstrates one or less of the following.
|
||||
NOTE: To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 pm MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 pm MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 pm MT Wednesday of the eighth week.
*Scholarly source: Per the APA Guidelines in Course Resources, only scholarly sources should be used in assignments and threaded discussions. These include peer reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. Your textbook and lesson are not considered to be an outside scholarly source. For the discussions, reputable internet sources such as websites by government agencies (URL ends in .gov) and respected organizations (often ends in .org) can be counted as scholarly sources. The best outside scholarly source to use is a peer reviewed nursing journal. You are encouraged to use the Chamberlain library and search one of the available data bases for a peer reviewed journal article. The following sources should not be used: Wikipedia, Wikis, or blogs. These web sites are not considered scholarly as anyone can add to these. Please be aware that .com websites can vary in scholarship and quality. For example American Heart Association is a .com site with scholarship and quality. It is the responsibility of the student to determine the scholarship and quality of any .com site. Ask your instructor before using any site that you are unsure of. If the instructor determines that the site does not demonstrate scholarship or quality, points will be deducted for not using scholarly sources. Current outside scholarly sources are required for the initial posting. This is defined to be 5 years or less. Instructor permission must be obtained if using a source that is older than 5 years.