NURS 6630 Discussion Foundational Neuroscience
Walden University NURS 6630 Discussion Foundational Neuroscience-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Walden University NURS 6630 Discussion Foundational Neuroscience assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NURS 6630 Discussion Foundational Neuroscience
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Walden University NURS 6630 Discussion Foundational Neuroscience depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NURS 6630 Discussion Foundational Neuroscience
The introduction for the Walden University NURS 6630 Discussion Foundational Neuroscience is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for NURS 6630 Discussion Foundational Neuroscience
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NURS 6630 Discussion Foundational Neuroscience assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NURS 6630 Discussion Foundational Neuroscience
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NURS 6630 Discussion Foundational Neuroscience
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NURS 6630 Discussion Foundational Neuroscience assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for NURS 6630 Discussion Foundational Neuroscience
Agonist-To-Antagonist Spectrum of Action of Psychopharmacologic Agents
In reference to drugs, medications may act as agonist nor antagonist. As an agonist, drugs bind to a certain target receptor, altering its action to produce a reaction. Agonist drugs activates the maximum receptor in the brain while a partial agonist produces a sub-maximal response when in contact with a receptor (Berg & Clarke, 2018). On the other hand, antagonist, binds to target receptors without producing any response, thus inhibiting agonist from occupying the receptor. The inverse agonists decrease the activity of a receptor imitating the reverse effect of an agonist (Nutt et, al. 2016).
Compare and contrast the actions of G couple proteins and Ion gated channels.
GPCR, located in eukaryotes consist of the main category of plasma membrane receptors. They play a major role as the primary targets for many drugs as well as binds to various types of ligands (Alvaro & Thorner, 2016). They transform signals from extracellular ligands to signals in intracellular relay of proteins, hence bonding with nucleotide guanosine triphosphate, and hydrolyzation occurs forming GDP. Ion gated channels are proteins that regulate the flow of selected ions passively across the plasma membrane. Due to the nature of gated channel, they only open under certain conditions such as specific ligands including ligand-gated ion channels, or for a specific electrical potential known as voltage-gated channels.
The main function of membrane receptors is to relay extracellular signals to the cell interior, thus allowing cells to communicate with each other and sense the extracellular environment. Other classes of membrane receptors are ion channels or possess an intrinsic enzymatic activity that generates an intracellular signal upon activation. In contrast, GPCRs rely on their interaction with G proteins to transmit signals to membrane-bound effectors including ion channels and enzymes (Glukhova et, al. 2018). The involvement of G proteins as intermediate transducers plays a critical role in ensuring the high flexibility, sensitivity, and specificity observed in GPCR signaling. A thorough understanding of how GPCRs and G proteins interact in our cells is vital to completely comprehend their role in physiology, disease as well as how to improve controlling them for pharmacological purposes (Krishnan & Schioth, 2015).
Role of Epigenetics and Pharmacologic Action
Epigenetics involves biological processes such as DNA methylation or histone modification that do not change the genome sequence but alter gene expressions. Epigenetics also explains the study of genetic information, changes and modifications coded in gene expression. The study of epigenetics has enhanced the understanding of various disease processes and the manufacturing of medications to treat diseases (Cavalli & Heard, 2019). Diseases/ conditions including cancers and neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease are often associated with epigenetic alteration, hence may be caused by a single base mutation. With the application of advanced technology such as genome testing and screening, the invention of pharmacological treatments is made possible in creating personalized, optimal, and specific disease management with potential prediction (Khoury & Holt, 2021).
Pharmacogenomics and The Impact on Mental Health Patients
Pharmacogenomics is an area of research that studies how an individual’s genes affect how the body responds to medications. Its long-term goal is to help providers select the drugs and doses best suited for each person. It is part of the field of precision medicine, which seeks in treating each patient individually. Pharmacogenomics help clinicians to map out personalized treatment to patients-based individual’s genetic pattern and response to drugs (Huang et, al. 20230). In the field of psychiatric medicine, understanding the genetic make-up of patients as well as how the body systems respond to certain drugs may assist providers determine the tolerability and metabolic impact to patients. For example, people with genetic variant with CYP2C9 gene alleles with reduced enzyme activity may need a decreased doses of certain drugs as opposed to patients with a normal CYP2C9 (Fekete et, al. 2021). Lithium toxicity can easily occur in patients with reduced or no enzyme activity as the liver metabolize medications slower resulting in build of the drug in the system. Another example could be seen in patients with duplications/multiplications of the wild-type allele, the body systems metabolize drugs quicker, thus may require a higher dose of medications (Butler, 2020).
References
Alvaro, C.G., Thorner, J. (2016). Heterotrimeric G Protein-Coupled Receptor Signaling in Yeast Mating Pheromone Response. J Biol Chem 291: 7788–7795, 2016. doi:10.1074/jbc.R116.714980.
Crossref
Links to an external site. | PubMed
Berg, K. A., Clarke, W.P. (2018). Making Sense of Pharmacology: Inverse Agonism and Functional Selectivity, International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, Volume 21, Issue 10, October 2018, Pages 962–977, https://doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyy071
Cavalli, G., Heard, E. (2019). Advances in Epigenetics link Genetics to the Environment and Disease. Nature 571, 489–499 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1411-0
Fekete, F., Mangó, K., Déri, M. (2012). Impact of Genetic and Non-Genetic Factors on Hepatic CYP2C9 Expression and Activity in Hungarian Subjects. Sci Rep 11, 17081 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96590-3
Glukhova, A., Draper-Joyce, C.J., Sunahara, R.K., Christopoulos, A., Wootten, D., Sexton, P.M. (2018). Rules of Engagement: GPCRs and G Proteins. ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci. 2018 Sep 7;1(2):73-83. doi: 10.1021/acsptsci.8b00026. PMID: 32219204; PMCID: PMC7089011.
Huang, S S., Chen, Y T., Su, M. H. (2023). Investigating Genetic variants for Treatment response to Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors in Syndromal Factors and Side Effects among Patients with Depression in Taiwanese Han population. Pharmacogenomics J (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41397-023-00298-8
Khoury, M.J., Holt, K.E. (2021). The Impact of Genomics on Precision Public Health: beyond the pandemic. Genome Med 13, 67 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-021-00886-Y
Krishnan, A., Schioth, H.B. (2015). The role of G protein-completed receptors in the early evolutiona of neurotransmission and the nervous system.J Exp Biol 218: 562-571,2015. Dio:10 1242/jeb.110312. Crossref{PubMed}
Butler, M.G. (2020). Pharmacogenetics and Psychiatric Care: A Review and Commentary. Departments of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences and Pediatrics, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
Nutt, D., Stahl, S., Blier, P., Drago, F., Zohar, J., Wilson, S. (2016). Inverse Agonists – What do they mean for psychiatry? Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2017 Jan;27(1):87-90. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2016.11.013. Epub 2016 Dec 7. PMID: 27955830
Sample Answer 2 for NURS 6630 Discussion Foundational Neuroscience
Neuroscience is the scientific study of the human central nervous system to understand the brain’s dysfunction that can lead to disease, mental disorders, and physical impairment (Karmarkar & Plassmann, 2019). The complex design of a neuron is the basic understanding of communication by sending impulses to other body organs. The brain controls human behavior and the functions of body organs. The anatomy and physiology of the brain help understand the part of the brain affected by mental illness. For example, poor concentration and cognitive skills dysfunction is the forebrain pathology. Additionally, one can understand the mode of action of psychopharmacology. For example, antidepressants may function by inhibiting the serotonin or epinephrine receptors.
An Agonist-To-Antagonist Spectrum of Action and How Partial and Inverse Agonists Influence Psychopharmacologic
An antagonist binds at the receptors by blocking any event of an agonist, hence, blocking the biological response. For example, naloxone is a competitive opioid antagonist and has no effects with opioid co-administration (Gicquelais, et al, 2019). An agonist binds to a receptor causing activation of the receptor, hence, the biological response. A partial agonist activates the receptors partially with lesser effect on the brain. For example, buprenorphine is a partial agonist, and therefore, an antagonist may block its opioid function without activating its receptors. An inverse receptor binds with constitutively active receptors and inhibits receptor activity by exerting opposite pharmacological effects that suppress spontaneous receptor signaling.
Comparison between Actions of G Couple Proteins and Ion Gated Channels
G coupled proteins GPCRs are integral membrane proteins that convert extracellular responses to hormones, neurotransmitters, olfaction, and taste signals. The GPCRs work by binding to the hormones, neurotransmitters, and growth factors to initiate a cellular response. The three types of G-couple receptors are alpha, beta, and gamma, in which the ligands bind and activate (Yudin & Rohacs 2019). Ion gated channels are integral membrane proteins of excitable cells that allow a flux of ions to pass only under defined circumstances. These channels are voltage-gated sodium channel neurons and ligand-dated acetylcholine receptors of the cholinergic synapses. The ion gated channel pull and bonds to the agonist changing the protein while g coupled proteins are used by the cells to convert intracellular signals into responses.
The Role of Epigenetics In the Pharmacologic Action
Epigenetics regulate gene activity by switching off the gene activity or activating the gene activity. Epigenetics plays a role in the phenotypic activity of the cell in diseases such as cancer and neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease. Epigenetics modify gene expressions after drug administration to counteract the disease states in humans. Epigenetics proves its effectiveness in treating psychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders to its ability to modify gene expressions.
The Significance of the Information to Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner
A psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner should have basic knowledge of the concepts of foundational neuroscience. Understanding the function of agonists, inverse and partial agonists, and antagonists prevent co-administration of drugs that agonize and antagonize the same receptors. For example, in treating a patient with a depressive mood disorder, prescribing antipsychotics such as fluphenazine worsens the depressive mood because it antagonizes the dopaminergic D1 and D2 receptors depressing the release of the hypothalamic hormone.
References
Gicquelais, R. E., Bohnert, A. S., Thomas, L., & Foxman, B. (2020). Opioid agonist and antagonist use and the gut microbiota: associations among people in addiction treatment. Scientific reports, 10(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76570-9
Karmarkar, U. R., & Plassmann, H. (2019). Consumer neuroscience: Past, present, and future. Organizational Research Methods, 22(1), 174-195.
https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1094428117730598
Yudin, Y., & Rohacs, T. (2019). The G‐protein‐biased agents PZM21 and TRV130 are partial agonists of μ‐opioid receptor‐mediated signalling to ion channels. British journal of pharmacology, 176(17), 3110-3125. https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.14702
Sample Answer 3 for NURS 6630 Discussion Foundational Neuroscience
Psychopharmacologic drugs work in a range of ways, from agonists to antagonists. An agonist binds chemically to a receptor, activating the receptor and triggering a biological response (Weir, 2020).
According to Berg and Clarke (2018), the conventional drug-receptor theory describes how medicines behave, how they interact with receptors, and how agonists and antagonists work in terms of affinity and intrinsic efficacy. Berg and Clark’s study of the idea shows that drugs can act as either agonists or antagonists. Conversely, agonist medicines have both intrinsic efficacy and affinity, while antagonist drugs only have a connection and no inherent efficacy. The authors claim that the antagonists lessen the possibility that the agonist drug will be occupied by occupying the receptor cells. On the other hand, greater agonist doses lead to increased agonist receptor occupancy, which inhibits antagonistic effects. A full agonist may have distinct intrinsic efficacies from a partial agonist, even when the latter induces a submaximal response. The effectiveness of a partial agonist is higher than that of a complete agonist. A complete agonist delivers the most reactions that a system is capable of producing.
Finally, because the post-receptor signaling pathway is full, an agonist can still cause a maximal response without using up all the receptors. This is called the spare receptors, which are also called the receptor reserve.
Your shared information will influence my decision to prescribe medication to patients by allowing me to assess each patient on an individual basis and consider the potential long-term effects of the drug. For instance, multiple patients with similar diagnoses of neurodegenerative disorders may receive different treatments because of a variety of factors, including genetic testing, prior medical history, and general health status, as a result of side effects from treatments. Because of factors including pharmacodynamics, kinetics, and metabolic rate, some drugs may be effective for some patients but ineffective for others.
References
Berg, K. A., & Clarke, W. P. (2018). Making Sense of Pharmacology: Inverse Agonism and Functional Selectivity. The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, 21 (10), 962–977. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyy071
Weir, C. J. (2020). Ion channels, receptors, agonists, and antagonists. Anesthesia & Intensive Care Medicine,11 (9), 377-383. Retrieved December 8, 2020, from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpaic.2010.06.002
As a psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner, it is essential for you to have a strong background in foundational neuroscience. In order to diagnose and treat clients, you must not only understand the pathophysiology of psychiatric disorders, but also how medications for these disorders impact the central nervous system. These concepts of foundational neuroscience can be challenging to understand. Therefore, this Discussion is designed to encourage you to think through these concepts, develop a rationale for your thinking, and deepen your understanding by interacting with your colleagues.
Required Readings
Note: All Stahl resources can be accessed through the Library using this link. This link will take you to a log-in page for the Library. Once you log into the library, the Stahl website will appear.
Stahl, S. M. (2013). Stahl’s essential psychopharmacology: Neuroscientific basis and practical applications (4th ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press *Preface, pp. ix–x
Note: To access the following chapters, click on the Essential Psychopharmacology, 4th ed tab on the Stahl Online website and select the appropriate chapter. Be sure to read all sections on the left navigation bar for each chapter.
Chapter 1, “Chemical Neurotransmission”
Also Read: NURS 6630 Discussion Reflect On Concepts Of Foundational Neuroscience
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NURS 6630 Discussion Foundational Neuroscience
Chapter 2, “Transporters, Receptors, and Enzymes as Targets of Psychopharmacologic Drug Action”
Chapter 3, “Ion Channels as Targets of Psychopharmacologic Drug Action”
Document: Midterm Exam Study Guide (PDF)
Document: Final Exam Study Guide (PDF)
Required Media
Laureate Education (Producer). (2016i). Introduction to psychopharmacology [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 3 minutes.
Accessible player
Optional Resources
Laureate Education (Producer). (2009). Pathopharmacology: Disorders of the nervous system: Exploring the human brain [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 15 minutes.
Dr. Myslinski reviews the structure and function of the human brain. Using human brains, he examines and illustrates the development of the brain and areas impacted by disorders associated with the brain.
Accessible player
Laureate Education (Producer). (2012). Introduction to advanced pharmacology [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 8 minutes.
In this media presentation, Dr. Terry Buttaro, associate professor of practice at Simmons School of Nursing and Health Sciences, discusses the importance of pharmacology for the advanced practice nurse.
Accessible player
To prepare for this Discussion:
Review this week’s Learning Resources.
Reflect on concepts of foundational neuroscience.
Sample Answer 4 for NURS 6630 Discussion Foundational Neuroscience
Pharmacological agents produce both agonist and antagonist actions in different receptors in the human body. The agonist and antagonist actions of pharmacological agents work against one another. The agonists combine with the receptor to produce an action in the body. On the other hand, antagonist action hinders or opposes the action by a receptor, thereby, leading to a failure of an occurrence of an event. The effect of agonists is attributed to the combination it has with compounds or chemical substances to promote the desired action while that of antagonist entails the combination with chemicals or blockage of neurotransmitters to cause interference with action. Partial and inverse agonists have an effect on the efficacy of psychopharmacological agents. Partial agonists bind to a specific receptor to produce partial efficacy at that receptor that is relative to the effect of full agonist. The partial enhancement of the actions of the receptor results in a net decline in the activation of the receptor hence, average activity of the receptor in producing the desired action. Inverse agonists work by binding to a receptor as an antagonist to produce an action that is opposite to that of the agonist (Demler, 2019). Inverse agonists mimic the agonist activity of the receptors, hence, the desired therapeutic activity of psychopharmacological agents.
G-couple proteins and ion-gated channels are the mechanisms in which cells communicate to produce actions. They comprise of the cell-surface receptors that play the roles of signal transfer in multicellular organisms. The two however differ in a number of aspects. Ion-gated channels have receptors that bind to a ligand to cause opening of channels via membranes to allow the passage of specific ions. Ion-gated channels do not allow the passage of fatty acids and amino acids because they are hydrophobic in nature. Ion-gated channels therefore mediate rapid, post-synaptic responses. G-proteins channels on the other hand have receptors that bind and active G-protein on cell membranes. The activation of G-proteins results in cyclic series that cause entry of proteins such as amino acids and fatty acids into the cell to produce action (Hood & Khan, 2020). The G-proteins therefore mediate slow post-synaptic responses.
Epigenetics has a role in pharmacologic actions of drugs. Firstly, changes in the expression of enzymes that metabolize drugs may affect the action as well as metabolism of a drug. For example, changes in enzymes due to aspects such as DNA methylation affects the metabolism of drugs, leading to their altered effectiveness. The addition of methyl group to the cytosine pyrimidine ring causes silencing of transcription, thereby, hindering the binding of co-activators and transcription factors that are needed for metabolism and action of drugs. The second influence of epigenetics is the genetic variations in the transporters of drugs. A genetic change in the transporters of drugs such as ATP binding cassette transporters and solute carrier transporter affect the binding and action of pharmacological agents (Castelo-Branco & Jeronimo, 2020).
The above information will affect my prescribing of medications to patients. For instance, it will translate into my understanding of the disease process and the targets of the medications that I prescribe to the patients. The implication of the information also entails the need for comprehensive patient assessment to identify any relevant patient history that may affect the effectiveness of the prescribed medications. I should also be aware of the contraindications of specific medications to patients with history of allergies or comorbid conditions (Hood & Khan, 2020). Therefore, the information will inform my safe prescribing in my professional role as an advanced practice nurse.
References
Castelo-Branco, P., & Jeronimo, C. (2020). Histone Modifications in Therapy. Elsevier Science.
Demler, T. L. (2019). Pharmacotherapeutics for Advanced Nursing Practice, Revised Edition. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Hood, P., & Khan, E. (2020). Understanding Pharmacology in Nursing Practice. Springer Nature.
Sample Answer 5 for NURS 6630 Discussion Foundational Neuroscience
I also believe the use of buspirone is in order because it is an anxiolytic drug, and beyond that, off-labeled buspirone is being used for the augmentation of unipolar depression. Although buspirone originally was developed as an antipsychotic but was found ineffective for psychosis, it had useful anxiolytic features (Wilson, 2023). Buspirone has recently gained popularity, largely because it has fewer side effects than other anti-anxiety treatments. Buspirone is primarily used to treat generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). It is an FDA-approved drug used to treat anxiety disorders and for short-term relief of anxiety symptoms.
However, it is important to understand the appropriate indications, doses, side effects, and toxicities before initiating buspirone therapy. The patient should also be educated on how to use drugs safely and ensure correct dosages. Additionally, in rare cases where there is evidence of substance abuse, healthcare professionals have a responsibility to ensure that patients are using buspirone only for legitimate purposes.
In addition, the patient should be educated to avoid taking alcohol as well some juices such as grapefruit while on buspirone, because talking alcohol while on this medication can lead to increased drowsiness and feeling lightheaded and even more severe problems such as problems with muscle control, memory, and breathing. Grapefruit on the other hand can change the way the drug moves through the body, potentially leading to excess absorption of buspirone in the body (Cuncic, 2022).
References
Cuncic, A. (2022). BuSpar Uses, Side Effects, and Dosages. https://www.verywellmind.com/buspar-treatment-of-social-anxiety-disorder-3024958
Wilson T. K., Tripp, J. (2023). Buspirone. StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK531477/
Sample Answer 6 for NURS 6630 Discussion Foundational Neuroscience
In addition to your post, let me add that psychopharmacology investigates the impact of medications on the brain and behavior, as well as the range of effects pharmaceuticals may have, which can vary from stimulating to inhibiting. Agonists act as neuron transmitter enhancers because their mechanism of action is like that of natural neuron transmitters, while antagonists are medications whose activities inhibit or block the activities of a targeted neuron transmitter at the receptor site (Azhagiya Singam, et al., 2019). Carefully selecting medications that act as agonists or antagonists for neurotransmitters allows for targeted treatment of several mental disorders; these medications help restore brain balance and alleviate symptoms by modulating the activity of neurotransmitters. Partial inverse agonists are medications that attach to the same receptor as an agonist but provide a lesser effect, which is useful in conditions where excessive receptor activation needs to be regulated (Berg & Clarke, 2018); however, they significantly impact diverse medical therapies.
There is a difference between ion-gated receptors and GPCRs regarding the signals they detect and how they work. They are adaptable and capable of detecting a broad spectrum of signals from hormones and neurotransmitters. On the other hand, ion-gated receptors directly regulate ion movement across the membrane by permitting the passage of ions like sodium, potassium, or calcium (Peng & Zhong,2015). In order to understand cellular signaling processes and create specific treatments for different illnesses, it is essential to understand how g-couple proteins and ion-gated channels work.
Epigenetic alterations to histones may change gene accessibility, making certain genes more accessible for transcription and others less accessible (Mazzone et al.,2019). This alteration, in turn, affects how pharmacologic medications work, leading to individual differences in how pharmaceuticals work.
Epigenetics changes the efficacy of drug metabolism, which is a major way it affects the prescription of psychiatric drugs (Wu et al.,2023). Many psychiatric drugs aim to alter neurotransmitter activity and reduce symptoms by targeting specific receptors in the brain. However, epigenetic changes may also impact these receptors’ expression by altering receptor expression, potentially reducing the effectiveness of certain medications. Hence, understanding the role of epigenetics will help a provider make sound prescription decisions that will be the best outcome for the patient.
References.
Azhagiya Singam, E. R., Tachachartvanich, P., La Merrill, M. A., Smith, M. T., & Durkin, K. A. (2019). Structural Dynamics of Agonist and Antagonist Binding to the Androgen Receptor. The journal of physical chemistry. B, 123(36), 7657–7666. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b05654.
Berg, K. A., & Clarke, W. P. (2018). Making Sense of Pharmacology: Inverse Agonism and Functional Selectivity. The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology, 21(10), 962–977. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyy071.
Mazzone, R., Zwergel, C., Artico, M., Taurone, S., Ralli, M., Greco, A., & Mai, A. (2019). The emerging role of epigenetics in human autoimmune disorders. Clinical epigenetics, 11(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-019-0632-2.
Wu, T., Cai, W., & Chen, X. (2023). Epigenetic regulation of neurotransmitter signaling in neurological disorders. Neurobiology of disease, 184, 106232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2023.106232
Also Read:
NURS-6630 Wk 1 Discussion: Foundational Neuroscience
NURS 6630 Assignment Treating Patients With Anxiety Disorders
NURS 6630 Discussion: Treatment for a Patient With a Common Condition
NURS 6630 Assessing and Treating Patients With Sleep/Wake Disorders
NURS 6630 Week 9 Therapy for Patients With ADHD/ODD
NURS 6630 Assignment Treating Patients With ADHD
NURS 6630 The Management of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
NURS 6630 Assignment Assessing and Treating Patients With ADHD
NURS 6630 Psycopharmacologic Approaches to Treatment
NURS 6630 Psychopharmacological Approach to Treat Psychopathology Assessment
NURS 6630 Assessing and Treating Patients With Impulsivity, Compulsivity, and Addiction
NURS 6630 Assignment 1 Assessing and Treating Patients With Impulsivity, Compulsivity, and Addiction
NURS 6630 Case 13: 8-Year-Old Girl Who Was Naughty
NURS 6630 Case 11: The Figment of a Man Who Looked Upon a Lady
NURS 6630 Case 14: Scatter-Brained Mother Whose Daughter Has ADHD, Like Mother, Like Daughter
NURS 6630 Case 21: Hindsight is Always 202/20, or Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
NURS 6630 Antidepressants for Pediatric Patients
NURS 6630 Assessing and Treating Clients With Dementia Patients
NURS 6630 Discussion Chemical Neurotransmission
NURS 6630 Discussion Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner
NURS 6630 Dementia and Its Treatment
NURS 6630 Therapy for Patients With Dementia and Comorbid States
NURS 6630 Week 7 Therapy for Patients With Schizophrenia
NURS 6630 Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Treatment
NURS 6630 Week 2 Neurotransmitters and Receptor Theory
NURS 6630 Week 1 Introduction to Neuroanatomy
NURS 6630 Assignment Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner
NURS 6630 Assignment Treating Pediatric Patients With Mood Disorders
NURS 6630 Assessing and Treating Patients With challenging Disorders
NURS 6630 Discussion Psychiatric Mental Health
NURS 6630 Discussion The Impact of Ethnicity on Antidepressant Therapy
NURS 6630 treatment of Insomnia
NURS 6630 Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
NURS 6630 characteristic of generalized anxiety disorder
NURS 6630 Case Study 53-year-old Puerto Rican Female with Comorbid Addiction
Excellent
Point range: 90–100 |
Good
Point range: 80–89 |
Fair
Point range: 70–79 |
Poor
Point range: 0–69 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Main Posting:
Response to the Discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. |
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Thoroughly responds to the Discussion question(s). Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three current credible sources. |
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to most of the Discussion question(s). Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. 50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three credible references. |
31 (31%) – 34 (34%)
Responds to some of the Discussion question(s). One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Post is cited with fewer than two credible references. |
0 (0%) – 30 (30%)
Does not respond to the Discussion question(s). Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Contains only one or no credible references. |
Main Posting:
Writing |
6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Written clearly and concisely. Contains no grammatical or spelling errors. Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Written concisely. May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors. Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Written somewhat concisely. May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors. |
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Not written clearly or concisely. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
Main Posting:
Timely and full participation |
9 (9%) – 10 (10%)
Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. Posts main Discussion by due date. |
8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
Posts main Discussion by due date. Meets requirements for full participation. |
7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Posts main Discussion by due date.
|
0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Does not meet requirements for full participation. Does not post main Discussion by due date. |
First Response:
Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources. |
9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Responds to questions posed by faculty. The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. |
8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.
|
7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Response is on topic, may have some depth.
|
0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Response may not be on topic, lacks depth.
|
First Response: Writing |
6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in Standard, Edited English. |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues. Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed. Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources. Response is written in Standard, Edited English. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication. Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication. Response to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. |
First Response: Timely and full participation |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. Posts by due date. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Meets requirements for full participation. Posts by due date. |
3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Posts by due date.
|
0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Does not meet requirements for full participation. Does not post by due date. |
Second Response: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources. |
9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Responds to questions posed by faculty. The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. |
8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.
|
7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Response is on topic, may have some depth.
|
0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Response may not be on topic, lacks depth.
|
Second Response: Writing |
6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in Standard, Edited English. |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues. Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed. Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources. Response is written in Standard, Edited English. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication. Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication. Response to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. |
Second Response: Timely and full participation |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. Posts by due date. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Meets requirements for full participation. Posts by due date. |
3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Posts by due date.
|
0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Does not meet requirements for full participation. Does not post by due date. |
Total Points: 100 |
---|