NR 505 Week 4: Qualitative Design and Sampling
Chamberlain University NR 505 Week 4: Qualitative Design and Sampling– Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Chamberlain University NR 505 Week 4: Qualitative Design and Sampling assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NR 505 Week 4: Qualitative Design and Sampling
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Chamberlain University NR 505 Week 4: Qualitative Design and Sampling depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NR 505 Week 4: Qualitative Design and Sampling
The introduction for the Chamberlain University NR 505 Week 4: Qualitative Design and Sampling is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for NR 505 Week 4: Qualitative Design and Sampling
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NR 505 Week 4: Qualitative Design and Sampling assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NR 505 Week 4: Qualitative Design and Sampling
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NR 505 Week 4: Qualitative Design and Sampling
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NR 505 Week 4: Qualitative Design and Sampling assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for NR 505 Week 4: Qualitative Design and Sampling
Research is categorized as quantitative or qualitative in nature. Quantitative research employs the use of numbers and accuracy while qualitative research focuses on lived experiences and human perception (Rutberg & Bouikidis, 2018). There are some advantages and disadvantages to both forms of research queries. The common goal of both is to conclude with positive, well-designed results that promotes change or introduces an intervention that is accurate and useful.
Control over Study Conditions Research Approach: Advantage
Quantitative
One advantage with the control over study conditions with quantitative research approach is the way the data is collected. One form of research method that is used is the use of surveys for collection of data. With the use of surveys, data can be analyzed in an easy and fast manner, therefore consumption of time is less. The quantitative research approach consists of less time consumption, which allows a large amount of data to be collected.
Qualitative
Qualitative research allows gathering of more in-depth data. Its use of in-depth, one-on-one interviews allows gaining a better understanding of collected data, thus allowing a better understanding of complex situations (Rutberg & Boukidis, 2018).
Control over Study Conditions Qualitative Research Approach: Disadvantage
Quantitative
A disadvantage with the control over study conditions with quantitative research approach is that research is less in-depth. The observation of collected data and pertinent information can be overlooked with this form of research. The results can become vague and useless to the research. This may cause a waste of time and resources, if the data is not reviewed for the intended outcome and accuracy.
Qualitative
A disadvantage of qualitative is its low credibility due to an inability to quantify predictors (Rutberg & Bouikidis, 2018). For example, the inability to give percentages of an unwarranted event’s chance of reoccurrence in the future.
Extending or Generalizing results from a sample or larger group or population with quantitative research approach:
Advantage:
Because quantitative research uses a larger population, a larger volume of data is collected, a broader study can be made with more subjects to be reviewed, thus allowing more generalization to occur (Rutberg & Boukidis, 2018).
Disadvantage:
The results are based on quantity and most participants will not offer much insight into their thoughts, causing a lack of reliable context (Rutberg & Boukidis, 2018).
Extending or Generalizing results from a sample or larger group or population with qualitative research approach:
Advantage:
Qualitative usually collects data through one –on –one interviews, focus groups, and discussions (Rutberg & Boukidis, 2018). The sample sizes are smaller allowing for a more in-depth collection of data to be utilized for research.
Disadvantage:
The use of a smaller sample size makes it difficult for this research method to generalize the results of the qualitative study.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NR 505 Week 4: Qualitative Design and Sampling
Reference
Rutberg, S., & Boukidis, C.D. (2018). Exploring the Evidence. Focusing on the Fundamentals: A Simplistic Differentiation Between Qualitative and Quantitative Research. Nephrology Nursing Journal, 45(2), 209-213
ALSO READ:
NR 505 Week 5: Data Collection
NR 505 Week 5: FNPs Role in Reducing Falls in Long-term Care Facilities
NR 505 Wk 5 Discussion: Data Collection SOLUTION
NR 505 Week 5 Research Summary Table Template SOLUTION
NR 505 Week 6: Statistical and Clinical Significance
NR 505 Week 7: Exploring Research Results
NR 505 Week 7: Data Collection, Analysis, Evaluation, Dissemination of Results, and Conclusion
NR 505 Week 7: Evidence-based Practice Project Proposal
NR 505 Week 7 Assignment: Evidence-based Practice Project Proposal Outline SOLUTION
NR505 Week 7 Assignment Evidence-based Practice Project Proposal Outline SOLUTION
NR 505 Week 8: Future Use of Evidence-Based Practice
NR 505 Why are research and evidence-based practice important for professional nursing?
NR 505 Using Evidence to Address Practice Issues SOLUTION
NR 505 Reflect upon the nursing practice issue of interest that you identified in earlier discussion assignments
NR 505 Collaboration Café – Qualitative Research (graded)
NR 505 What factors might influence the particular data collection method that is used within a research study?
NR 505 Reflect upon the impact of evidence-based practice on health outcomes, the nursing profession, and healthcare delivery
Sample Answer 2 for NR 505 Week 4: Qualitative Design and Sampling
I will attempt to provide a description of the design tradition for the proposal of unplanned health care for the rural population. The research design is used to connect related elements of the study in a rational manner in order to conclude with useful knowledge that can improve the issues. While it may not be comprehensive enough at this point, I plan to use the quantitative method of research which uses measurements that focuses on cause and effect predictions. In this study, I will attempt to integrate the factors that contribute to unplanned healthcare for the rural population. The planned design tradition that I plan to use quasi-experimental. The quasi- experimental design lacks randomaization in the study (Stichler, 2016). The use of surveys for members of the rural population that are affected by unplanned healthcare will be used to gather the research data. The surveys will be self – designed or programmed, allowing for quantification of data to occur. While I am not fully aware of how the design will fit into my research method, or if I completely understand the design tradition, my goal is to achieve the knowledge needed to fulfill the reasearch study in order to fully address the issues for the proposal. Thanks again for your post.
Reference
Stichler, J. (2016). Research, Research-Informed Design, Evidence-Based Design: Whatis theDifference and Does it Matter? HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal. Retrieved from: http://ebscohostcom.chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org
Sample Answer 3 for NR 505 Week 4: Qualitative Design and Sampling
When looking at qualitative research and quantitative research we will be looking at the advantage and disadvantage in some areas.When looking at quantitative research and the control over the study conditions on advantage would be that with quantitative they “use objective methods designed to control the research situation with the goal of minimizing bias and maximizing validity” (Polit & Beck, 2017). One disadvantage to quantitative research and control over the study conditions would be that maybe they keep the area of study to narrow and don’t allow them selves to expand research further on a given area of interest.
When looking at the qualitative research approach and the control over study conditions that are an advantage would be that one area of research could lead to another area of interest and study and can be expanded upon and are more flexible. A disadvantage of using qualitative research approach is that this type of study usually involves a small group of people there for not including a wide range for details and statistics in groups.
Extending or generalizing results from a sample to a larger group or population with the quantitative research approach advantages would be that it tries to quantify a problem and understand how prevalent it can be by looking for project-able results to a larger population(Polit & Beck, 2017). A disadvantage to this would be that the population or group is to large to obtain accurate results or statistics to produce the results of the study.
Extending or generalizing results from a sample to a larger group or population with the qualitative research approach advantages could be that there are now new studies and guidelines that one can follow for this approach, they can be that new insights are gained and new questions emerge on the area of interest and maybe a larger group to study (Smith, Gelling, Haigh, Barnason, Allan, & Jackson, 2017). A disadvantage would be that if it is a larger group or similar sample then they could possibly arrive at the same conclusions or similar information and the study would not progress.
Polit, D. F. & Beck, C. T. (2017). Essentials of nursing research: Appraising evidence for nursing practice (9th ed.). Philadelphia PA: Wolters Kluwer Health. Retrieved from e-book electronic source.
Smith, G. D., Gelling, L., Haigh, C., Barnason, S., Allan, H., & Jackson, D. (2017). The position of reporting guidelines in qualitative nursing research. Journal Of Clinical Nursing, 27(5-6), 889-891.Retrieved from https://eds-a-ebscohost-com.chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org/eds/detail/detail?vidLinks to an external site.
Sample Answer 4 for NR 505 Week 4: Qualitative Design and Sampling
There is no argument that parents make a huge impact on a child’s food choices at a young age. Their influence affects a child’s health for years and a lifetime. This article was quite interesting and a great perspective of the healthcare provider’s perceptions on the cause of childhood obesity.
Catherine touched on something important that I noted about this study and want to expand on it a little. Barriers to accessing healthy food have a major impact on childhood obesity. Something I would consider quite important about this study that I did not see addressed is the location of the study and the parents’ access to quality food versus unhealthy food options. Did the parents being evaluated by the providers have the resources to make a healthier choice in their food options? It seems to me here in the United States we should not have to have this conversation, but not everywhere in the country is there access to healthy food.
If you have ever lived in a food desert, you know access to quality food can be difficult. I was reading an article I happened across about food deserts earlier this week (Daniels, 2020). As of 2020, 2 Million people in Georgia live in food deserts, of those 500,000 of them are children (Daniels, 2020). That is little or no reasonable access to quality food to make healthier choices. They are not starving, but they have to make a concerted effort to get fresh fruit and vegetables. Potentially passing up many quick easy unhealthy options to make the best choices. Making time to find the food, which could be over an hour to drive and collect, prepare the food, and do all the things that need to be done as a parent can be time-consuming and difficult. I am not trying to create problems that may not be issues for the parents in this study, but because it was not addressed in this study, it raises a flag for me.
Another point that was touched on but skimmed over was breastfeeding. Breastfeeding is great if the mother has access to healthy foods herself, but when healthy foods are hard to access, breastfeeding is not always healthy for the baby or mom (Machado et al., 2019). I do not disagree that starting foods at the wrong time can be detrimental to a child’s long-term health and increase the chances of childhood obesity, but so can being malnourished due to the parent lacking resources (Owino et al., 2019). Ultimately, as healthcare providers, the need to ensure the child is achieving optimal nourishment from the resources provided at an early age allows the child to develop in an appropriate way so as to impact their long-term health outcomes positively.
I believe this study needs to be expanded to look at the resources available and the nutrition each child is actually receiving not just the weight of the child. I agree there needs to be more education surrounding healthy eating habits of both the child and the parents, there also needs to be a better understanding of why parents make the choices they do about how they choose to feed their children.
As providers, we need to be aware of the patient’s needs when we try to understand childhood obesity. While we know what is good and healthy for a child, the resources of the parent and the community come into play heavily. We can share healthy eating practices and educate parents on how to make the best choices, but if the resources are not available, making those changes may be a bigger task to overcome.
Daniels, M. (2020, August 11). What is a food desert?. Georgia Rural Health Innovation Center. https://www.georgiaruralhealth.org/blog/what-is-a-food-desert/Links to an external site.
Heller, Chiero, J. D., Trout, N., & Mobley, A. R. (2021). A qualitative study of providers’ perceptions of parental feeding practices of infants and toddlers to prevent childhood obesity. BMC Public Health, 21(1), 1–1276. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11305-7Links to an external site.
Machado, M. R., Kamp, F., Nunes, J. C., El-Bacha, T., & Torres, A. G. (2019). Breast milk content of vitamin A and E from early- to mid-lactation is affected by inadequate dietary intake in Brazilian adult women. Nutrients, 11(9), 2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11092025Links to an external site.
Owino, V. O., Murphy‐Alford, A. J., Kerac, M., Bahwere, P., Friis, H., Berkley, J. A., & Jackson, A. A. (2019). Measuring growth and medium‐ and longer‐term outcomes in malnourished children. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12790