NURS 6003 Discussion Using the Walden Library
Walden University NURS 6003 Discussion Using the Walden Library– Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Walden University NURS 6003 Discussion Using the Walden Library assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NURS 6003 Discussion Using the Walden Library
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Walden University NURS 6003 Discussion Using the Walden Library depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NURS 6003 Discussion Using the Walden Library
The introduction for the Walden University NURS 6003 Discussion Using the Walden Library is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for NURS 6003 Discussion Using the Walden Library
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NURS 6003 Discussion Using the Walden Library assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NURS 6003 Discussion Using the Walden Library
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NURS 6003 Discussion Using the Walden Library
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NURS 6003 Discussion Using the Walden Library assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for NURS 6003 Discussion Using the Walden Library
I grew up watching my mother take care of my younger brother with special needs. My brother was born with spina bifida and down syndrome which made him wheelchair bound his whole life. His birth defects led to several complications such as ventilator dependent, tube feeding, and needing around the clock care. Both my parents worked, my father was an accountant and my mother a nurse which meant that she was well equipped to care for my brother; however, she still had to work, which meant that I had to pick-up some of the slack and assist with my brother’s care & daily routine. I remember how patient, gentle and caring my mother was while caring for my brother. I spent a lot of time watching every procedure she performed, because I wanted to make sure I did it right and the smile he had on his face every time I helped him with any of his needs made my heart melt. That’s how I knew what my calling was. I’ve learned I can truly make a difference in people’s lives. That’s how I knew nursing was my true calling. I have enjoyed being a bedside nurse (mostly while working with patients with some form of dementia). I feel that with advanced education I can reach more people in my community, because of the infinite potential us nurses have to help and change someone’s life for the better. I also enjoy the feeling of knowing I am making a difference for my patients and their families.
I plan on using database CINAHL plus with full text which stands for the cumulative index to nursing and allied health literature (Walden University Library, n.d) via the Walden University library to assist me in completing my FNP program. The peer reviewed article I decided to cite is related to the management of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). I chose this database because it covers journal about many nursing related topics and great peer-reviewed articles. The Centers for Disease Control and prevention (CDC, 2020) defines AD as an incurable progressive disease and a form of dementia that involves parts of the brain that controls memory, thoughts and language (CDC, 2020). I did not encounter any challenges while searching for the article. I typed Alzheimer’s disease prevention and treatment which brought up 776 academic journals on the topic.
The CINAHL plus with full text database will help me as a nursing student. I was able to find several articles of interest, but one picked my interest, it’s a journal article reviewed this year that talked about a novel drug that targets the prevention and treatment of AD. This article was about successfully using monoclonal antibodies for treating AD if detected in the early stages (Bogar, Penke & Szucs, 2023). I would recommend this database to my fellow classmates and colleagues. Professionals and students that are new to scholar writing can use the CINAHL plus with full text to find peer-reviewed materials that are well organized with credible information, easy to navigate and contains a plethora of relevant evidence-based-practice research that can be used on the field as well.
https://nursingassignmentgurus.com/nurs-6003-discussion-using-the-walden-library/
My goal as an MSN student is to one day become an Adult-Gerontology Acute Care Nurse Practitioner. The peer-review article I chose is titled “Acute Care Nurse Practitioner Students’ Perceptions of a Debriefing Experience After a Cardiac Emergency High-Fidelity Simulation: A Qualitative Study” (2021). This article can be found in AACN Advanced Critical Care, a journal published by the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (2021). As nurses advance their role to becoming acute care nurse practitioners, they need specialized training to prepare them. This study uses a qualitative approach to explore students’ perceptions on whether simulation on emergent situations and debriefing experiences would grow their leadership-related learning abilities (Ali et al., 2021).
Because online search databases typically contain only abstracts, I found it difficult to locate a peer-reviewed journal article in its entirety unless subscribed to that database. Also, after using Walden’s database, I had a hard time locating an article that was recently published, and pertinent to advanced practice nursing in a critical care setting. I am a member of AACN and I have utilized its evidence-based resources for many purposes throughout my career. Experts explain that evidence-based practice is the integration of individual clinical expertise with the best available external clinical evidence from systematic research (Al-Jundi & Sakka, 2017). The AACN is a useful database for students and professionals because it is a professional organization that provides peer-reviewed research that is evidence-based as well as carefully evaluated healthcare information by the guidance of fully qualified experts. This database also includes research and data services that are centered around baccalaureate and graduate nursing programs.
The “AACN Scope and Standards for Acute Care Nurse Practitioner Practice” describes and measures the expected level of practice and professional performance for acute care nurse practitioners and offers a practical tool for students, educators, and advanced practice nurses caring for high acuity or critically ill patients and their families (AACN, 2021). Therefore, I would recommend this database to my colleagues who have a goal is becoming an acute care nurse practitioner one day.
References
Ali, A. A., Miller, E., Musallam, E., & Ballman, K. (2021). Acute care nurse practitioner students’ perceptions of a debriefing experience after a cardiac emergency high-fidelity simulation: A qualitative study. AACN Advanced Critical Care, 32(3), 264–274. https://doi.org/10.4037/aacnacc2021376
American Association of Critical Care Nurses. (2021). AACN Scope and Standards for Acute Care Nurse Practitioner Practice. https://www.aacn.org/nursing-excellence/standards/aacn-scope-and-standards-for-acute-care-nurse-practitioner-practice.
White, T., Kokiousis, J., Ensminger, S., & Shirey, M. (2017). Supplementing intensivist staffing with nurse practitioners. AACN Advanced Critical Care, 28(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.4037/aacnacc2017949
Where can you find evidence to inform your thoughts and scholarly writing? Throughout your degree program, you will use research literature to explore ideas, guide your thinking, and gain new insights. As you search the research literature, it is important to use resources that are peer-reviewed and from scholarly journals. You may already have some favorite online resources and databases that you use or have found useful in the past. For this Discussion, you explore databases available through the Walden Library.
Note: Unless otherwise noted, initial postings to Discussions are due on or before Day 3, and response postings are due on or before Day 6. You are required to participate in the Discussion on at least three different days (a different day for main post and each response). It is important to adhere to the weekly time frame to allow others ample time to respond to your posting. In addition, you are expected to respond to questions directed toward your own initial posting in a timely manner.
Sample Answer 2 for NURS 6003 Discussion Using the Walden Library
I’ve decided to pursue a career as a psychiatric/mental health nurse practitioner. After 28 years of working as a mental nurse, I made the decision to advance my career. The peer-reviewed article used is entitled. “How PMHNP Program Directors Facilitate Psychotherapeutic Skill Acquisition by the authors Wesemann, Convoy, Goldstein, and Melino. I looked for this article by typing “PMHNP” into the Walden library tab. Next, I selected the “peer-reviewed” link on the left and entered the keyword “psychotherapeutic,” I then restricted my search. A list of articles from the Thoreau/EBSCO search engine appeared, and I chose this particular one.
Finding this peer-reviewed article was not difficult for me. The library database at Walden University is quite trustworthy. Yes, I would recommend this database, because it is accessible, and the full articles are available for usage. “A good database should begin with valuable metadata and data”, (Siyavula. n.d.). Criteria used for selecting a good database is using one that is a reliable monitoring and alerting system, (Guo, 2022). This database will be very helpful to my colleagues for the reasons stated above. My search was able to be limited by a large number of alternatives. The Walden library’s EBSCO database has excellent themes and a big selection of articles, therefore I would definitely recommend it.
References
Guo, L. (2022). How to efficiently choose the right database for your applications. PingCAP. Retrieved from https://www.pingcap.com/blog/how-to-efficiently-choose-the-right-database-for-your-applications/
Siyavula. (n.d.). Characteristics of a good database. Retrieved from https://www.siyavula.com/read/it/grade-12-it/database-design-concepts/02-database-design-concepts
Wesemann, D., Convoy, S., Goldstein, D., & Melino, K. (2022). How PMHNP Program Directors Facilitate Psychotherapeutic Skill Acquisition. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 10783903221091980. https://doi.org/10.1177/10783903221091980
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6003 Discussion Using the Walden Library
To Prepare:
• Review the information presented in the Learning Resources for using the Walden Library, searching the databases, and evaluating online resources.
• Begin searching for a peer-reviewed article that pertains to your practice area and interests you.
By Day 3 of Week 4
Post the following:
Using proper APA formatting, cite the peer-reviewed article you selected that pertains to your practice area and is of particular interest to you and identify the database that you used to search for the article. Explain any difficulties you experienced while searching for this article. Would this database be useful to your colleagues? Explain why or why not. Would you recommend this database? Explain why or why not.
By Day 6 of Week 6
Respond to at least two of your colleagues’ posts by offering suggestions/strategies for working with this database from your own experience, or offering ideas for using alternative resources.
NURS 6003 Discussion Using the Walden Library – nursingassignmentgurus
Also Read:
NURS6003 Week 7 Assignment Part 4: Research Analysis
NURS 6003 Part 3 Research Analysis Assignment
NURS 6003 Module 3 Research Analysis
NURS 6003 Discussion Strategies for Academic Portfolios
NURS 6003 Part 4 Finalizing The Plan Assignment
NURS6003 Week 10 Discussion Examining Nursing Specialties
NURS6003 Transition to Graduate Study Week 1 Quiz
Nurs6003 Transition To Graduate Study For Nursing Week 6 Discussion
Nurs6003 Transition To Graduate Study For Nursing Week 3 Assignment
NURS6003 Week 5 Assignment Part 3: Strategies to Promote Academic Integrity and Professional Ethics
NURS6003 Week 9 Assignment Part 5: Professional Development
Nurs6003 Transition To Graduate Study For Nursing Week 1 Quiz
Nurs6003 Transition To Graduate Study For Nursing Week 4 Quiz
NURS 6003 Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Assignment
NURS 6003 Assignment specialty of psychiatric-mental health nursing
NURS 6003 Discussion Adult-Gerontology Acute Care Nurse Practitioner (AG-ACNP) program
NURS 6003 Transition Discussion Board Week 8
NURS 6003 Discussion Post an Explanation of your Choice of a Nursing Specialty Within the Program
NURS 6003 Describe your Approach to Identifying and Analyzing Peer-Reviewed Research
NURS 6003 Quiz: APA Style and Format
NURS 6003 Week 1 Assignment Assignment: Academic Success and Professional Development Plan
NURS 6003 Transition to Graduate Study Week 1 Quiz
Sample Answer 3 for NURS 6003 Discussion Using the Walden Library
The most straightforward way to identify a peer-reviewed article is to use one of the University Library’s numerous databases that are available to students who are interested in scholarly research (Walden University Library, n.d.). In research and according to Walden University (n.d.) t is vital to find more peer-reviewed publications that have been validated and probed for originality and validity when seeking for articles for any scholarly writing or literature. It has always been my interest to apply using nursing diagnosis in the holistic treatment of mentally ill patients, which entails assessing their needs and producing a clear plan of care that includes establishing the diagnosis and building strategies to implement the planned care for improved outcomes.
The PubMed database which I used helped me to easily locate an article titled Nursing Diagnoses Related to Psychiatric Adult Inpatient Care by Frauenfelder et al. (2018), which taught me a lot more about evidence-based practice for the speciality I chose. I had no trouble finding it because the database (PubMed) allows for a search that involves using criteria to find an article based on publication date, article kind, text availability, and other factors. The researcher’s task of locating the right article for the intended analysis is made significantly easier as a result of this. I would recommend this database to my colleagues because it is simple to use and can provide the exact information that a researcher needs by using the available filters and limiters.
References:
Frauenfelder, F., van Achterberg, T., & Muller Staub, M. (2018). Nursing diagnoses related to psychiatric adult inpatient care. Journal of clinical nursing, 27(3-4), e463–e475. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13959
Walden University Library. (n.d.). Verify peer review. https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/verifypeerreview
Walden University. (n.d.). Scholarly writing: Overview. https://academicguideswaldenu.edu/writingcenter/scholarly
Making Use of the Walden Library
Where can you look for evidence to support your ideas and scholarly writing? You will use research literature to explore ideas, guide your thinking, and gain new insights throughout your degree program. It is critical to use peer-reviewed and scholarly journal resources when searching the research literature. You may already have some favorite online resources and databases that you use or have previously found useful. For this Discussion, you will look into the databases available at the Walden Library.
Unless otherwise specified, initial Discussions postings are due on or before Day 3, and response postings are due on or before Day 6. You must take part in the Discussion on at least three different days (a different day for main post and each response). It is critical to stick to the weekly time frame so that others have enough time to respond to your posting. Furthermore, you are expected to respond to questions about your initial posting in a timely manner.
To Get Ready:
Examine the Learning Resources for information on using the Walden Library, searching databases, and evaluating online resources.
Begin your search for a peer-reviewed article that is relevant to your practice area and of interest to you.
By Week 4’s third day
Put up the following:
Cite the peer-reviewed article that pertains to your practice area and is of particular interest to you, using proper APA formatting, and identify the database that you used to search for the article. Describe any difficulties you encountered while looking for this article. Would your coworkers benefit from this database? Explain why you think this is the case or why you think it isn’t. Would you recommend this database to others? Explain why you think this is the case or why you think it isn’t.
By Week 4’s Day 6
Respond to at least two of your colleagues’ posts by providing suggestions/strategies for working with this database based on your own experience, or by suggesting alternative resources.
Click the Reply button to the right to reveal the textbox where you can enter your message. Then, to post your message, click the Submit button.
Sample Answer 4 for NURS 6003 Discussion Using the Walden Library
I enjoyed reading your post and I can relate to a lot of what you said in it. I feel that more then ever with the amount of research, journals, articles and opinions that will be published in regard to COVID we need to step back and critically analyze whether the article or data is scholarly. According to Laureate Education “it is important for nurses to conduct research; we are at the bedside and we see problems that need to be addressed that perhaps others would not see” (2018). This is critical when we begin to analyze the data that is being published by multiple parties. We are in a good position to do our own research and start the process of changing what does not work for these patients and we can accomplish this with credible data and peer review research ourselves. As bedside nurses we are in a crucial role to change health care and get our findings out to other organizations that can benefit from what we have learned.
I also agree with you that research poses challenges when using the online libraries. I also struggled with it. When I looked up education and COVID for example I was presented with so much information that it was overwhelming and when I researched it more I found a lot of the information was not scholarly but public press releases and opinions without much data to them. When I was evaluating the articles and journals I relied on the Walden Library’s page on Evaluating Resources for some key points to check for the credibility of the publication. I found a lot of trade publications which according to the library “are written by staff writers or practitioners in a given trade or profession. The intent is to share industry news, trends and advances”( Walden Library, n.d.). Some of the articles are peer reviewed but a majority do not get peer reviewed. In the future I am going to use your recommendation to use the “Advanced Search” tab and see if I cannot rein in some of the topics that come up when I do a complete search. This may help with some of my frustration and time it takes me to research articles. Thank you.
References
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). The Walden Journey to a Masters in Nursing: Scholarship [Video file]. Baltimore, MD; Author.
Walden University Library,. (n.d.). Evaluating resources: Journals. Retrieved October 4th, 2019 from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/evaluating/resource-types/journals
Sample Answer 5 for NURS 6003 Discussion Using the Walden Library
Thank you, Connor, for this excellent post. I read with great interest your recommendations. Understanding the library’s dynamic can be difficult at first, but the more we use it the easier it will get. One feature I like is the Course Guides. It helps me to “jump” into the course material without returning to the course page. Occasionally, the number of articles to locate and review can be overwhelming, especially if we are taking more than one course at the same time. The Course Guides section takes you directly to the required reading of a specific course and offer assignment help (Walden University, 2020a).
As an international student I can tell you that the library is user-friendly. Language difficulties, cultural differences and lack of prior library experience are the key barriers to library use amongst international students (Murray & Preston, 2016). However, Walden Library makes it easy for us. Like you, I strongly recommend the use of the library to help us advance academically.
Wunram, H. L., Stefanie, H., Martin, H., Maxi, V., Franziska, J., Franziska, R., . . . Oliver, F. (2018). Whole Body Vibration Added to Treatment as Usual is Effective in Adolescents with Depression: A partly randomized, three-armed clinical trial in inpatients. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 27, 645-662. doi:10.1007/s00787-017-1071-2
As the preceding paper was published in a reputable academic journal, I feel it is appropriate to reference it as it relates to my professional work in the field of mental health. I am particularly interested in the effects of physical activity on depression because some of my patients are poor at taking their medicine. Instead of abandoning them, I’d like to find them some form of assistance.
What I already understood about depression was the first thing I wrote down. I gave some thought to how doing out affects the body as a whole, not just individuals who do it to get in shape or cut calories. I also help some of my patients put things in perspective so they can understand how exercise, as opposed to medications alone, can assist them. Then, I followed the course’s database search instructions. I went to the “Plus with Full Text” section of the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature and put in “depression,” “exercise,” and “antidepressants,” in that order. The following criteria helped me focus my lookup: Journal article format, English language content, published between January 2015 and January 2020.
Overwhelmingly, my first search returned over a hundred items. Inputting data into the filter’s individual lines has escaped my memory. While I did try searching in other databases, such as EBSCO and Google Scholar, I was unsatisfied with the outcomes. I went again over “How to Evaluate Journals,” one of the week’s required readings. I regrouped and began my investigation once more. Reduced size was the end outcome. After reviewing the literature and contrasting my findings, I settled on the CINAHL database. By comparing the articles’ content and depth, I was able to pick the one that best spoke to me.
After extensive literature review and consideration of the most recent data, I have concluded that regular physical activity, whether combined with antidepressants or taken alone, is beneficial for people with depression. It came as a surprise to me to learn that adding whole-body vibration to the therapy of depressed people improves their condition. This means that even mild physical activity can help these people recover faster and more completely.
CINAHL is an excellent resource that has been invaluable to my study, and I have no doubt that it will prove as beneficial to my peers. It’s comprehensive, covering a broad variety of subjects, and it’s available in languages than English. It’s all-encompassing, with many of options for narrowing down your search, like I did.
In addition to the benefits I listed above, I think CINAHL database is very useful for nursing students since it serves as a starting point for our study.
Name: NURS_6003_Module03_Week04_Discussion_Rubric
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main Posting |
Points Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. Supported by at least three current, credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
Points Range: 40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s). One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Post is cited with two credible sources. Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately. Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Contains only one or no credible sources. Not written clearly or concisely. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
| Main Post: Timeliness |
Points Range: 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3.
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3.
|
| First Response |
Points Range: 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
Points Range: 15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
Points Range: 13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. |
| Second Response |
Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. |
| Participation |
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
|
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.
|
| Total Points: 100 |
|---|