coursework-banner

NURS 6003 Using the Walden Library

NURS 6003 Using the Walden Library

NURS 6003 Using the Walden Library

I am passionate about palliative care, which is my motivation for advancing my degree. The National Institute on Aging (2021) describes palliative care as a supportive specialty focused on the quality of life for patients and loved ones through symptom management and identifying goals of care. Palliative care, also known as comfort care, addresses patients holistically to meet all needs. Unfortunately, there is an enormous number of patients in need of support from this specialty. The World Health Organization (2020) reported, “only about 14% of people who need palliative care currently receive it”, which is overwhelmingly low and motivates me more to specialize in comfort care. Palliation should be encouraged because it can alleviate burdens associated with life-threatening and long-term illnesses.

Palliative care is available in inpatient and outpatient settings. The specialty cares for patients of varying ages, backgrounds, and diagnoses. Since there is a diverse patient population, it is essential to have different healthcare members contribute to care planning. I wanted to show the importance of nurse practitioners (NPs) in palliative care, and I found an article discussing how NPs positively impact this field. Opitz and Hebert (2018) argue that nurse practitioners have shown an increase in quality of life with higher patient satisfaction while providing care at lower costs for more affordable care. This report highlights NPs’ abilities to reduce healthcare barriers and encourages an increase of NPs in the specialty.

In my search for an article, I used CINAHL and found it resourceful. The database has a large selection of journals and articles related to healthcare. CINAHL is easy to navigate, and I recommend that others use it for current and future studies. There are various advanced search options to narrow searches, which allowed me to find an article more promptly. I found the article by entering keywords pertaining to my interest, then limited it to publication years 2012 through 2023 and chose academic journals as the publication type. The advanced search provided me with many peer-reviewed articles focused on palliative care and nurse practitioners. CINAHL is a helpful tool I plan to use for more research.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6003 Using the Walden Library

Where can you find evidence to inform your thoughts and scholarly writing? Throughout your degree program, you will use research literature to explore ideas, guide your thinking, and gain new insights. As you search the research literature, it is important to use resources that are peer-reviewed and from scholarly journals. You may already have some favorite online resources and databases that you use or have found useful in the past. For this Discussion, you explore databases available through the Walden Library.
Note: Unless otherwise noted, initial postings to Discussions are due on or before Day 3, and response postings are due on or before Day 6. You are required to participate in the Discussion on at least three different days (a different day for main post and each response). It is important to adhere to the weekly time frame to allow others ample time to respond to your posting. In addition, you are expected to respond to questions directed toward your own initial posting in a timely manner.

To Prepare:

• Review the information presented in the Learning Resources for using the Walden Library, searching the databases, and evaluating online resources.
• Begin searching for a peer-reviewed article that pertains to your practice area and interests you.

By Day 3 of Week 4

Post the following:
Using proper APA formatting, cite the peer-reviewed article you selected that pertains to your practice area and is of particular interest to you and identify the database that you used to search for the article. Explain any difficulties you experienced while searching for this article. Would this database be useful to your colleagues? Explain why or why not. Would you recommend this database? Explain why or why not.
By Day 6 of Week 4
Respond to at least two of your colleagues’ posts by offering suggestions/strategies for working with this database from your own experience, or offering ideas for using alternative resources.
Click on the Reply button below to reveal the textbox for entering your message. Then click on the Submit button to post your message.

RE: Discussion – Week 4

My goal as an MSN student is to one day become an Adult-Gerontology Acute Care Nurse Practitioner. The peer-review article I chose is titled “Acute Care Nurse Practitioner Students’ Perceptions of a Debriefing Experience After a Cardiac Emergency High-Fidelity Simulation: A Qualitative Study” (2021). This article can be found in AACN Advanced Critical Care, a journal published by the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (2021). As nurses advance their role to becoming acute care nurse practitioners, they need specialized training to prepare them. This study uses a qualitative approach to explore students’ perceptions on whether simulation on emergent situations and debriefing experiences would grow their leadership-related learning abilities (Ali et al., 2021).
Because online search databases typically contain only abstracts, I found it difficult to locate a peer-reviewed journal article in its entirety unless subscribed to that database. Also, after using Walden’s database, I had a hard time locating an article that was recently published, and pertinent to advanced practice nursing in a critical care setting. I am a member of AACN and I have utilized its evidence-based resources for many purposes throughout my career. Experts explain that evidence-based practice is the integration of individual clinical expertise with the best available external clinical evidence from systematic research (Al-Jundi & Sakka, 2017). The AACN is a useful database for students and professionals because it is a professional organization that provides peer-reviewed research that is evidence-based as well as carefully evaluated healthcare information by the guidance of fully qualified experts. This database also includes research and data services that are centered around baccalaureate and graduate nursing programs.
The “AACN Scope and Standards for Acute Care Nurse Practitioner Practice” describes and measures the expected level of practice and professional performance for acute care nurse practitioners and offers a practical tool for students, educators, and advanced practice nurses caring for high acuity or critically ill patients and their families (AACN, 2021). Therefore, I would recommend this database to my colleagues who have a goal is becoming an acute care nurse practitioner one day.

References

Ali, A. A., Miller, E., Musallam, E., & Ballman, K. (2021). Acute care nurse practitioner students’ perceptions of a debriefing experience after a cardiac emergency high-fidelity simulation: A qualitative study. AACN Advanced Critical Care, 32(3), 264–274. https://doi.org/10.4037/aacnacc2021376
American Association of Critical Care Nurses. (2021). AACN Scope and Standards for Acute Care Nurse Practitioner Practice. https://www.aacn.org/nursing-excellence/standards/aacn-scope-and-standards-for-acute-care-nurse-practitioner-practice.
White, T., Kokiousis, J., Ensminger, S., & Shirey, M. (2017). Supplementing intensivist staffing with nurse practitioners. AACN Advanced Critical Care, 28(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.4037/aacnacc2017949

RESPOND HERE (150 WORDS, 3 REFERENCES)

This is insightful Kelly, the article selected, “Acute Care Nurse Practitioner Students’ Perceptions of a Debriefing Experience after a Cardiac Emergency High-Fidelity Simulation: A Qualitative Study” (2021), is relevant to the topic or area of study. Specialized training is necessary for the nurses who want to advance their roles in acute care (Ali et al., 2021). The article contains essential information required in the course or the area of study. From the article, the abstract only contain basic information about the topic under the study. However, the article can be accessed from the link provided (White et al., 2017). The full article contain advanced information and data required for the entire study. The full document also contain comprehensive information about the topic under the study. Walden University database contain numerous articles that can be applied to research about the same topic (Bramer et al., 2018). To determine the exact article required in the research processes, the application of keywords or phrases is essential. These keywords provided direct link to the document required.

References

Ali, A. A., Miller, E., Musallam, E., & Ballman, K. (2021). Acute care nurse practitioner students’ perceptions of a debriefing experience after a cardiac emergency high-fidelity simulation: A qualitative study. AACN Advanced Critical Care, 32(3), 264–274. https://doi.org/10.4037/aacnacc2021376
Bramer, W. M., de Jonge, G. B., Rethlefsen, M. L., Mast, F., & Kleijnen, J. (2018). A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 106(4), 531. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6148622/
White, T., Kokiousis, J., Ensminger, S., & Shirey, M. (2017). Supplementing intensivist staffing with nurse practitioners. AACN Advanced Critical Care, 28(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.4037/aacnacc2017949

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6003 Using the Walden LibraryNURS 6003 Using the Walden Library

RE: Discussion – Week 4

Peer-Reviewed Article on COVID-19 and Mental Health in the United States

The significant impact of the pandemic on the population’s mental health has been one of the main reasons I pursued my MSN in Psychiatric-Mental Health degree. Its effects on individuals from all walks of life, regardless of race and gender, have been hard to ignore. For this discussion, the article I chose is titled COVID-19 and mental health equity in the United States by Purtle (2020). In this journal, the author discussed that socially disadvantaged groups like those in the low-income brackets and those belonging to racial/ethnic minorities experienced more pandemic-related psychiatric illnesses (Purtle, 2020). Using the database APA PsycInfo, I keyed the words “COVID-19” and “mental health” on the first search field and “United States” on the second field. To expand my search, I included the Boolean “AND.” The search resulted in 470 articles. One setback I encountered was the vast number of articles I generated from my initial inquiry and narrowed my search. To focus my search, I used the “TI” Titles from the optional field, chose FullText, and publication years 2019 to 2021 as my limiters, resulting in 17 articles (Walden University Library, n.d.).
There are many valuable databases available for research and scientific studies. APA PsycInfo is one of them. Like many databases, it contains trusted and credible peer-reviewed articles. However, APA PsycInfo would be more beneficial for those pursuing studies on behavioral and social sciences as it has more choices of psychiatric journals than the MEDLINE database (Eady, Wilczynski, & Haynes, 2008). APA PsycInfo contains one of the most extensive selections, more than 5million scientific papers, focusing on this field (American Psychological Association, n.d.). Therefore, it would be a useful resource for anyone interested in this field of study. I would highly recommend this to my colleagues also pursuing MSN in Psychiatry-Mental Health.

Initial Discussion Post – Week 4

Top of Form

I’ve decided to pursue a career as a psychiatric/mental health nurse practitioner. After 28 years of working as a mental nurse, I made the decision to advance my career. The peer-reviewed article used is entitled. “How PMHNP Program Directors Facilitate Psychotherapeutic Skill Acquisition by the authors Wesemann, Convoy, Goldstein, and Melino. I looked for this article by typing “PMHNP” into the Walden library tab. Next, I selected the “peer-reviewed” link on the left and entered the keyword “psychotherapeutic,” I then restricted my search. A list of articles from the Thoreau/EBSCO search engine appeared, and I chose this particular one.

Finding this peer-reviewed article was not difficult for me. The library database at Walden University is quite trustworthy. Yes, I would recommend this database, because it is accessible, and the full articles are available for usage. “A good database should begin with valuable metadata and data”, (Siyavula. n.d.). Criteria used for selecting a good database is using one that is a reliable monitoring and alerting system, (Guo, 2022). This database will be very helpful to my colleagues for the reasons stated above. My search was able to be limited by a large number of alternatives. The Walden library’s EBSCO database has excellent themes and a big selection of articles, therefore I would definitely recommend it.

References

Guo, L. (2022). How to efficiently choose the right database for your applications. PingCAP. Retrieved from https://www.pingcap.com/blog/how-to-efficiently-choose-the-right-database-for-your-applications/

Siyavula. (n.d.). Characteristics of a good database. Retrieved from https://www.siyavula.com/read/it/grade-12-it/database-design-concepts/02-database-design-concepts

Wesemann, D., Convoy, S., Goldstein, D., & Melino, K. (2022). How PMHNP Program Directors Facilitate Psychotherapeutic Skill Acquisition. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 10783903221091980. https://doi.org/10.1177/10783903221091980

References

American Psychological Association. (n.d.). APA PsycINFO – APA publishing | APA.
https://www.apa.org. https://www.apa.org/pubs/databases/psycinfo

Eady, A. M., Wilczynski, N. L., & Haynes, R. B. (2008). PsycINFO search strategies identified
methodologically sound therapy studies and review articles for use by clinicians and
researchers. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 61(1), 34–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.09.016

Purtle, J. (2020). COVID-19 and mental health equity in the United States. Social Psychiatry
and Psychiatric Epidemiology: The International Journal for Research in Social and
Genetic Epidemiology and Mental Health Services, 55(8), 969–971. https://doi-
org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1007/s00127-020-01896-8

Walden University Library. (n.d.). Databases A-Z:
Nursing. https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/az.php?s=19981

RESPOND HERE (150 WORDS, 3 REFERENCES)

This is insightful Claricel, the significant impact of the pandemic on the population’s mental health has been one of the main reasons I pursued my MSN in Psychiatric-Mental Health degree. Master of Science in Psychiatric-Mental Health is essential in gaining knowledge in evidence-based practices and the research processes in healthcare (American Psychological Association, n.d). The journal identified is relevant to the research topic or the topic under consideration. The journal can be accessed through the link that have been provided (Bramer et al., 2018). This link leads to a comprehensive information that can be applied in the gaining information about the topic under consideration (White et al., 2017). Walden university database contain numerous sources of information that can be applied in the research process. Using the keywords or phrases is necessary in finding the link to the relevant information that is needed. Apart from Walden University database, there is APA PsycInfo database that can be applied to identify information required. APA PsycInfo database contain relevant and credible information that can be applied in the research processes.

References

American Psychological Association. (n.d.). APA PsycINFO – APA publishing | APA.
https://www.apa.org. https://www.apa.org/pubs/databases/psycinfo
White, T., Kokiousis, J., Ensminger, S., & Shirey, M. (2017). Supplementing intensivist staffing with nurse practitioners. AACN Advanced Critical Care, 28(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.4037/aacnacc2017949
Bramer, W. M., de Jonge, G. B., Rethlefsen, M. L., Mast, F., & Kleijnen, J. (2018). A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 106(4), 531. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6148622/

I enjoyed reading your post and I can relate to a lot of what you said in it. I feel that more then ever with the amount of research, journals, articles and opinions that will be published in regard to COVID we need to step back and critically analyze whether the article or data is scholarly. According to Laureate Education “it is important for nurses to conduct research; we are at the bedside and we see problems that need to be addressed that perhaps others would not see” (2018). This is critical when we begin to analyze the data that is being published by multiple parties. We are in a good position to do our own research and start the process of changing what does not work for these patients and we can accomplish this with credible data and peer review research ourselves. As bedside nurses we are in a crucial role to change health care and get our findings out to other organizations that can benefit from what we have learned.

I also agree with you that research poses challenges when using the online libraries. I also struggled with it. When I looked up education and COVID for example I was presented with so much information that it was overwhelming and when I researched it more I found a lot of the information was not scholarly but public press releases and opinions without much data to them.  When I was evaluating the articles and journals I relied on the Walden Library’s page on Evaluating Resources for some key points to check for the credibility of the publication. I found a lot of trade publications which according to the library “are written by staff writers or practitioners in a given trade or profession. The intent is to share industry news, trends and advances”( Walden Library, n.d.). Some of the articles are peer reviewed but a majority do not get peer reviewed. In the future I am going to use your recommendation to use the “Advanced Search” tab and see if I cannot rein in some of the topics that come up when I do a complete search. This may help with some of my frustration and time it takes me to research articles. Thank you.

References

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). The Walden Journey to a Masters in Nursing: Scholarship [Video file]. Baltimore, MD; Author.

Walden University Library,. (n.d.). Evaluating resources: Journals. Retrieved October 4th, 2019 from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/evaluating/resource-types/journals

Also Read:

NURS6003 Week 7 Assignment Part 4: Research Analysis

NURS 6003 Part 3 Research Analysis Assignment

NURS 6003 Module 3 Research Analysis

NURS 6003 Discussion Strategies for Academic Portfolios

NURS 6003 Part 4 Finalizing The Plan Assignment

NURS6003 Week 10 Discussion Examining Nursing Specialties

NURS6003 Transition to Graduate Study Week 1 Quiz

Nurs6003 Transition To Graduate Study For Nursing Week 6 Discussion

Nurs6003 Transition To Graduate Study For Nursing Week 3 Assignment

NURS6003 Week 5 Assignment Part 3: Strategies to Promote Academic Integrity and Professional Ethics

NURS6003 Week 9 Assignment Part 5: Professional Development

Nurs6003 Transition To Graduate Study For Nursing Week 1 Quiz

Nurs6003 Transition To Graduate Study For Nursing Week 4 Quiz

NURS 6003 Academic integrity involves fundamental values such as fairness, honesty, responsibility, and trust in writing

NURS 6003 Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Assignment

NURS 6003 Assignment specialty of psychiatric-mental health nursing

NURS 6003 Discussion Adult-Gerontology Acute Care Nurse Practitioner (AG-ACNP) program

NURS 6003 Transition Discussion Board Week 8

NURS 6003 Discussion Post an Explanation of your Choice of a Nursing Specialty Within the Program

NURS 6003 Describe your Approach to Identifying and Analyzing Peer-Reviewed Research

NURS 6003 Discussion Post an Explanation of at Least Two Strategies for Including Academic Activities and Accomplishments into your Professional Development Goals

NURS 6003 Discussion Begin Searching for a Peer-Reviewed Article that Pertains to your Practice Area and Interests you

NURS 6003 Quiz: APA Style and Format

NURS 6003 Week 1 Assignment Assignment: Academic Success and Professional Development Plan

NURS 6003 Transition to Graduate Study Week 1 Quiz 

Peer Response

Thank you, Connor, for this excellent post. I read with great interest your recommendations. Understanding the library’s dynamic can be difficult at first, but the more we use it the easier it will get. One feature I like is the Course Guides. It helps me to “jump” into the course material without returning to the course page. Occasionally, the number of articles to locate and review can be overwhelming, especially if we are taking more than one course at the same time. The Course Guides section takes you directly to the required reading of a specific course and offer assignment help (Walden University, 2020a).

As an international student I can tell you that the library is user-friendly. Language difficulties, cultural differences and lack of prior library experience are the key barriers to library use amongst international students (Murray & Preston, 2016). However, Walden Library makes it easy for us. Like you, I strongly recommend the use of the library to help us advance academically.

NURS_6003_Module03_Week04_Discussion_Rubric

Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Posting
Points Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

Supported by at least three current, credible sources.

Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Points Range: 40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

Supported by at least three credible sources.

Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Responds to some of the discussion question(s).

One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Post is cited with two credible sources.

Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Contains some APA formatting errors.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 34 (34%)

Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Contains only one or no credible sources.

Not written clearly or concisely.

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Post: Timeliness
Points Range: 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3.
First Response
Points Range: 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

Points Range: 15 (15%) – 16 (16%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

Points Range: 13 (13%) – 14 (14%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 12 (12%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

No credible sources are cited.

Second Response
Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 11 (11%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

No credible sources are cited.

Participation
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.
Total Points: 100